Medical Journal questions HPV vaccine ethics, science

[Guest guest]

From one article about this (see below for link to the study)"On January 12, 2011 the ls of Medicine published a ground-breaking peer-reviewed paper titled, Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine policy and evidence-based medicine: Are they at odds?, 1written by renowned researchers Lucija Tomljenovic, Ph.D., and Shaw, Ph.D., with the Neural Dynamics research Group, University of British Columbia, in Vancouver. 2.The

article points out to the medical community what most consumers now know about the fraudulent global health agency policies in combination with the pharmaceutical companies lack of science based evidence demonstrating the safety and efficacy of Gardasil and Cervarix.........Merck's clinical trials were flawed because they used an aluminum adjuvant as a 'placebo' and only used saline as a comparative for minor,

non-serious adverse reactions. With serious adverse reactions, they pooled the results from the saline group and the aluminum 'placebo' group. By doing this, they concealed the true rate of serious reactions."download the paper published in the ls of Medicine here<vaccineliberationarmy.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Tomljenovic-and-Shaw-HPV-vaccines-and-evidence-based-medicine-Ann-Med-20111.pdf>Of course this is a peer reviewed paper. The authors discuss the (non-) effectiveness of HPV vaccination - it's never been shown to reduce actual cancer cases in real life- they review the lists of adverse reactions with special attention to the known risks of aluminum adjuvanted vaccines. They also do a risk/benefit ratio analysis, discuss safer alternatives to HPV vaccine, cost analysis and more. all the Best in Health,Liora Pearlman , ModeratorMomPlease consider calling me at 5130 3931 or texting 139 1030 6022 if it is time sensitive.