Virology - the misnamed Science

[Guest guest]

http://www.fearoftheinvisible.com/introduction-to-the-book

Introduction to book - Virology - the

misnamed Science

by Janine

The word ‘virus' comes from the Latin for a poisonous liquid, and before

that from the Sanskrit for the same. The hunt for them started when,

towards the end of the 19th century, it was suggested that invisible

living particles much smaller than bacteria might cause the epidemic

illnesses for which no bacterial cause could be found. When the electron

microscope found tiny particles in the blood serum of patients entering

and leaving human cells, this was a Eureka Moment. The prediction

was surely about to be proved true. These particles were assumed to

be invading and hijacking our cells in order to reproduce. They were thus

all condemned as poisons, as ‘viruses.'

As more of these were searched for and found in sick people, many

illnesses became blamed on them. They became the invisible enemy,

the nano-terrorist we must fear. We were instructed that one of our first

duties for our newborn children is to vaccinate them against this dreaded

foe. Thus was created an ever-growing multibillion-dollar

pharmaceutical industry.

But, as I have travelled through the science that underlies this

industry, I have gradually learnt to ask questions. I now realise that

there is another way to see this story that fits all the data. I have

learnt from biologists that our cells naturally produce viral-like

particles without being invaded or infected, both when healthy and sick.

Currently such particles are named by asking what illnesses they cause as

if this is their raison d'être, their only importance, the sole reason

for cells making them. They would be named far more positively and

comprehensively by asking what cells produce them and for what

purpose.

Scientists like Barbara McClintock, who won a Nobel Prize for finding

that cells operate with intelligence and seek to repair themselves, have

given us a very different understanding of the particles they make. We

now know that our cells create multitudes of tiny transport particles

(vesicles) to carry the proteins and genetic codes needed within and

between cells. The ones that travel between cells, those our cells use to

communicate with each other - are puzzlingly just like those that we have

long blamed for illnesses.

It now seems that we may have broadly misconceived the virus; that they

may be simply inert messages in envelopes carried from cell to

cell. In the last ten years scientists have begun to call them

instead ‘exosomes', ‘particles that leave the body' of the cell, thus

removing the inference that they are all poisons. Distinguishing

the healthy particle from the pathogenic is now an enormous problem for

the virologist, for it has been discovered that our cells make them all

in the same way, in the very same place. It also seems we cannot

stop this process without risking severely damaging our cells.

So, perhaps we need to halt the juggernaut of virology with its virus

hunt, and look to see if there is another way of helping us keep healthy.

We need to know how we can strengthen the malnourished cell, rather than

use the many medicines that try to prevent it from making particles by

interfering with its essential processes. We need to know if a poisoned

cell may produce unhealthy messengers or viruses. We need to learn

far more about cells - for only now are we starting to understand how

they communicate and the very important role played in this by the

particles we had totally demonised as viruses.

I spent over 4 years in the 1990s researching why the vaccines made to

protect our children from viruses sometimes instead did them grievous

damage. It then took me over 8 years to travel from accepting

without question that a virus causes polio and another causes AIDS

to discover that most people, including myself, have been vastly

misled.

I now realize that science today is so specialized, that every new

generation of scientists has had to trust that those who laid the

foundations got things right, for they cannot repeat this earlier work

except at great cost. If this trust ever proves to be misplaced, it is

absolutely vital to correct this with all speed and courage.

I have been horrified to learn from the highest scientific authorities

that this trust has sometimes been very grievously misplaced. For

example, high-level US governmental inquiries in the 1990s, guided by

eminent scientists, explicitly reported the key foundation HIV research

papers were riddled with grave errors and deceptively " fixed. "

They documented these findings with great care - and I likewise do so

here. But when the Republican Party gained control over the US House of

Representatives at the end of 1994, it ended this most important

investigation, buried its reports and left the scientific papers it found

to be erroneous uncorrected. These same papers are thus still frequently

used by unsuspecting scientists worldwide, who cite them as proof that

HIV causes AIDS. I present clear evidence here that these papers were

fixed at the last moment before publication. I also reproduce the

original documents so you can judge for yourselves.

When I dug back further, to the origins of virology and the great hunt

for the poliovirus, I found the story was scandalously much the same.

Powerful evidence was presented to Congress linking the summer polio

epidemics to summer-used heavy metal pesticides. These scientists

suggested remedies, reported curing polio - and were ignored. Instead

parents were told to be scared of a yet undiscovered virus. Today

thousands of children are still being identically paralysed in regions

where such pesticides are heavily used - but all the World Health

Organisation (WHO) says is: ‘Don't worry; we have nearly exterminated the

dreaded poliovirus. We have checked. The paralysed children were not

infected by it.'

As for childhood vaccinations, surely they have proved a great

benefit? I long thought so, but I have found the government

scientists we entrust with our children's lives have admitted, at

official vaccine safety meetings reported here for the first time, that

they cannot clean these vaccines; that they allowed their use despite

knowing that they are scandalously polluted with numerous viruses, viral

and genetic code fragments, possibly toxins, prions and oncogenes. The

World Health Organisation has also disclosed at these meetings that it

has long known that the MMR vaccine to be contaminated with avian

leucosis virus. This is a bird virus linked to leukaemia, but the public

have not been told about this. Why most children are not falling

ill from this dangerous contamination is, it seems, because most are

thankfully gifted by nature with very effective immune systems - and

because these viruses are generally not as dangerous as these scientists

believe.

As for the great flu' epidemic of 1918, it is used today to spread fear

of viruses. Yet, shortly after it occurred, an eminent Yale University

professor reported that bacteria primarily caused it, and the flu viruses

present were virtually harmless. As far as I can discover, his work

remains unquestioned but not mentioned. I thus report it in this book. As

for the recent scare over bird flu - any self-respecting bird would fall

ill and create new viruses if subjected to the amounts of pollution now

emitted in China. What we need to focus on is the pollution - not to

waste a fortune on chasing genetic code fragments in birds healthily

migrating thousands of miles.

What also of the many eminent scientists who have concluded publicly that

the HIV theory of AIDS must be scientifically flawed because their

research indicates that it has other causes and is curable? Is it

right that their research is being suppressed, ridiculed and not funded -

simply because they have not confirmed the establishment's theory for

this dreaded epidemic? At the end of this book I list some of their

names and positions.

Among these dissenters are at least one Nobel Laureate and many senior

professors at major universities. But it seems, no matter how important

the academic chairs they hold, they are all mocked for so concluding and

are scarcely ever interviewed. Instead they are scandalously called

‘Denialists,' as if they had denied the Nazi Holocaust, on the basis that

their work dissuades people from taking antiretroviral chemotherapy

drugs - which logically cannot be lifesaving, despite all claims,

if a retrovirus is not to be blamed.

I have to ask what are the consequences of this uncritical adherence to

the theory of HIV? So far this theory has produced no cure

and no vaccine despite the spending of some $200 billion on research. So,

what if unacknowledged fraud is a major reason for this continual

frustration? Is HIV science built upon flawed and fraudulent research? As

for Gallo, the first scientist awarded the credit for discovering

HIV; it seems he may have only escaped criminal prosecution for fraud in

developing the HIV test on a technicality; because it was found by a

State Attorney General that too much time had elapsed for his prosecution

to be undertaken.

As for AIDS in Africa, journalists rarely check how AIDS is diagnosed in

that continent. Most logically presume it is diagnosed the same as in the

West. But, if they had checked, they would have learnt that World

Health Organisation has set very different criteria for an AIDS diagnosis

in Africa - explicitly stating that AIDS can be diagnosed solely on the

basis of symptoms common to other major diseases! Thus many diseases can

be and are diagnosed as AIDS in Africa. I cite these remarkable

diagnostic rules in full in this book so you can judge this for

yourselves.

If the dissenting scientists were right, if we wrongly fear a sexually

transmitted virus, this discovery would have an enormous impact around

the world and especially in Africa. It would cause a vast uplifting of

the spirits of its people, far greater than anything achieved by

" Alive-AID " concerts. We all know how devastating it is for an

individual to be told that they are HIV positive and will inevitably die

of AIDS. What then does it do to the morale of the people of a continent

to be told that they are not only desperately poor but incurably blighted

- due to sex? "

We have been taught to greatly fear viruses - and yet scientists have

long known that these are fundamental parts of life, made by the millions

by all healthy cells. I hope this book will help by combating this

fear, this damning of the invisible because we do not understand it.

Without this fear, hopefully the focus in medical research will shift to

the environmental toxins that really do put us, and our world, gravely at

risk.

As for myself, my work as an investigative journalist previously was on

relatively safer subjects for one's reputation in the liberal press, such

as arms for Iran, Aboriginal land rights, blood diamonds. I do not expect

such a relatively easy ride this time, given the emotion connected to

this issue. Indeed, attempts have already been made to prevent this work

appearing, by the same academics who have tried to prevent publicity for

the works of the ‘dissident' scientists, I suppose I should be honoured

to be seen so early as a danger by them, even before this book appeared!

You can read here verbatim their attacks on my work and judge their

validity for yourselves.

But the truth needs to be out. I hope my account will help to lift

the fear with which these natural and fascinating tiny particles have

been enshrouded for far too long. They are the products of our cells -

and they helped make us.

When I began some twelve years ago my journey into medical research, it

took me into the grim world of the virus hunters - but then, utterly

unexpectedly, it led to me being utterly enthralled by the marvels of

miniscule world of the cell and of its messenger particles or viruses, a

world that may well extend across galaxies. I invite you to join me on

this journey to meet with our oldest, smallest ancestors, ones whom we

are only just now starting to

know.

For an example of ‘infection' used as a criteria, see Retroelement and

Retrovirus Universal Classification - Pat Heslop-on.

http://www.le.ac.uk/bl/phh4/retrocla.htm

Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian

Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Washington State, USA

Vaccines -

http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/ Homeopathy

http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com

Vaccine Dangers, Childhood Disease Classes & Homeopathy

Online/email courses - next classes start April 5