Guest guest Posted March 12, 2012 Report Share Posted March 12, 2012 I read a post in a answer to 'herd immunity'. I don't really believe it but I'm not sure how to refute.... Can anyone comment? Magda " Herd immunity can occur naturally if a population is exposed to a pathogen on a regular basis AND if the immune response is durable AND if the pathogen does not " drift " (like flu viruses). That is a lot of ifs. Unfortunately, highly virulent organisms tend infect everyone in a population, wipe out a certain number of them, and then move on to other susceptible populations or regress to their carrier species. When the same pathogen comes back around in 20 or 30 years, there are plenty of members of the population who never saw that pathogen before and have no immunity. The same thing recurs: lots of people sick and lots of deaths. That's where vaccinations come in: they work best when enough people (or animals) are vaccinated to stop the chain of transmission of the pathogen from one host/victim to another. But if some are immunized and/or naturally immune and others are not, the pathogen will be transmitted for as long as it finds hosts to propagate in. Every unvaccinated child presents an opportunity for the most lethal pathogens we know — that is why we have developed vaccines to them. Herd immunity created through vaccination is what eradicated smallpox. Herd immunity created through vaccination is what eradicated polio throughout much of the world. Herd immunity is what got my generation through school without measles or rubella. To think that people are willing to put their own and other people's children at risk of these diseases again bewilders me. I cannot stay silent on these issues. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.