9 Questions That Stump Every Pro-Vaccine Advocate and Their Claims

July 15, 2012

http://preventdisease.com/news/09/102809_9_arguments_to_win_any_vaccine_debate.shtml

9 Questions That Stump Every

Pro-Vaccine Advocate and Their Claims

Lire en Français

Since the flu pandemic was declared, there have been several so-called

" vaccine experts " coming out of the wood work attempting to

justify the effectiveness of vaccines. All of them parrot the same

ridiculous historical and pseudoscientific perspectives of vaccinations

which are easily squelched with the following 9 questions.

Claim: The study of vaccines, their

historical record of achievements, effectiveness, safety and mechanism in

humans are well understood and proven in scientific and medical

circles.

Fact: The claim is completely false.

1. What to ask: Could you please provide

one double-blind, placebo-controlled study that can prove the safety and

effectiveness of vaccines?

2. What to ask: Could you please

provide scientific evidence on ANY study which can confirm the long-term

safety and effectiveness of vaccines?

3. What to ask: Could you please

provide scientific evidence which can prove that disease reduction in any

part of the world, at any point in history was attributable to

inoculation of populations?

4. What to ask: Could you please

explain how the safety and mechanism of vaccines in the human body are

scientifically proven if their pharmacokinetics (the study of bodily

absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of ingredients) are

never examined

or analyzed in any vaccine study?

One of the most critical elements which defines the toxicity potential of

any vaccine are its pharmacokinetic properties. Drug companies and health

agencies refuse to consider the study, analysis or evaluation of the

pharmacokinetic properties of any vaccine.

There is not one double-blind, placebo-controlled study in the history of

vaccine development that has ever proven their safety, effectiveness or

achievements (unless those achievements have underlined their damage to

human health).

There are also no controlled studies completed in any country which have

objectively proven that vaccines have had any direct or consequential

effect on the reduction of any type of disease in any

part of the world.

Every single study that has ever attempted to validate the safety and

effectiveness of vaccines has conclusively established carcinogenic,

mutagenic, neurotoxic or fertility impairments, but they won't address

those.

******************************************************************************

Claim: Preservatives and chemical

additives used in the manufacture of vaccines are safe and no studies

have been linked or proven them unsafe for use in humans.

Fact: The claim is completely false.

5. What to ask: Could you please provide

scientific justification as to how injecting a human being with a

confirmed neurotoxin is beneficial to human health and prevents disease?

6. What to ask: Can you provide a

risk/benefit profile on how the benefits of injecting a known neurotoxin

exceeds its risks to human health for the intended goal of preventing

disease?

This issue is no longer even open to debate. It is a scientifically

established fact in literally hundreds of studies that the preservatives

and chemical additives in vaccines damage cells. Neurotoxicity, immune

suppression, immune-mediated chronic inflammation and carcinogenic

proliferation are just a few of several effects that have been observed

on the human body.

See a list of chemicals in vaccines

Fortunately, the drug companies still tell us the damage vaccines have on

the human body. People just don't read them. All you have to do is look

at the insert for any vaccine, and it will detail the exact

ingredients, alerts and potentially lethal effects.

See my latest

analysis of the Arepanrix H1N1 vaccine for an example.

Any medical professional who believes that it is justified to inject any

type of neurotoxin into any person to prevent any disease is completely

misguided, misinformed, deluded and ignorant of any logic regarding human

health.

******************************************************************************

Claim: Once an individual is injected

with the foreign antigen in the vaccine, that individual becomes immune

to future infections.

Fact: The claim is completely false.

7. What to ask: Could you please provide

scientific justification on how bypassing the respiratory tract (or

mucous membrane) is advantageous and how directly injecting viruses into

the bloodstream enhances immune functioning and prevents future

infections?

8. What to ask: Could you please

provide scientific justification on how a vaccine would prevent viruses

from mutating?

9. What to ask: Could you please

provide scientific justification as to how a vaccination can target a

virus in an infected individual who does not have the exact viral

configuration or strain the vaccine was developed for?

All promoters of vaccination fail to realize that the respiratory tract

of humans (actually all mammals) contains antibodies which initiates

natural immune responses within the respiratory tract mucosa. Bypassing

this mucosal aspect of the immune system by directly injecting viruses

into the bloodstream leads to a corruption in the immune system itself.

As a result, the pathogenic viruses or bacteria cannot be eliminated by

the immune system and remain in the body, where they will further grow

and/or mutate as the individual is exposed to ever more antigens and

toxins in the environment which continue to assault the immune

system.

Despite the injection of any type of vaccine, viruses continue

circulating through the body, mutating and transforming into other

organisms. The ability of a vaccine manufacturer to target the exact

viral strain without knowing its mutagenic properties is equivalent to

shooting a gun at a fixed target that has already been moved from its

location. You would be shooting at what was, not what is!

Flu viruses, may mutate, change or adapt several times over a period of

one flu season, making the seasonal influenza vaccine 100% redundant and

ineffective every single flu season. Ironically, the natural immune

defenses of the human body can target these changes but the vaccines

cannot.

I have never encountered one pro-vaccine advocate, whether medically or

scientifically qualified, who could answer even 1 let alone all 9 of

these questions. One or all of the following will happen when debating

any of the above questions:

- They will concede defeat and admit they are stumped

- They will attempt to discredit unrelated issues that do not pertain to

the question.

- They will formulate their response and rebuttal based on historical

arguments and scientific studies which have been disproved over and over

again.

Not one pro-vaccine advocate will ever directly address these questions

in an open mainstream venue.

Flu Vaccine Exposed: Think Twice!

Dave Mihalovic is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in

vaccine research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to

treatment.

*

A full list of h1n1 vaccine ingredients, alerts and warnings.

Sign In

9 Questions That Stump Every Pro-Vaccine Advocate and Their Claims

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Join the conversation

Activity