Guest guest Posted September 7, 2004 Report Share Posted September 7, 2004 Hello to the list readers especially the Bishop and his staff, In this article I saw that most new infections are occurring in the age group of 20 - 35. Since more than half of India's 1.2 billion population is now under the age of 20 it is to be expected that this age group must become the highest risk. No where did I see any reference to improved risk management programs associated with sexual health and safety. We know enough about AIDS now to know how to avoid infection and how to manage sexual safety but no where in this article was the mention such information. Of course we hear yet again that some of the country's blood is still a risk. Why is that so when international treatment protocols for stored transfusable blood products have a treatment process to make them safe for all as from 1990? Then the article ends with another unfortunate quote that says how fatal the disease is. We have to stop talking about mother to child transmission as unavoidable. No mothers should be passing on their infection to their babies. We know how to stop that. Sero discordant couples need not infect their negative partners when planning a family. And above all we have to start seeing AIDS as a chronic manageable infection rather than a fatal disease if we want people to be less fearful about it and more prone to knowing and preserving their immune function. Just some prompting and I hope that this information is available to the good Bishop as he plans for a care program for infection patients. Geoffrey E-mail: <gheaviside@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2004 Report Share Posted September 7, 2004 Dear FORUM, I agree with Mr. Heaviside, that by now blood transmission and MTCT should have been addressed. However, I somewhat disagree with this statement: " ...we have to start seeing AIDS as a chronic manageable infection rather than a fatal disease if we want people to be less fearful about it and more prone to knowing and preserving their immune function. " When coupled with complete and accurate information that is accessible to all, this would be a good method of reducing stigma against PLWHA. However, as the majority of people in the world do not have correct information about HIV/AIDS, if people begin to think of it as a " chronic manageable infection " rather than a fatal disease, this attitude may lead to risk behavior. This may sound ridiculous at first, but take the US for example. After the media furor on AIDS died down after 1994 or so, people stopped talking and thinking about AIDS. They thought you could take some pills and be fine. Then infection rates began to rise again, not surprisingly. Especially among heterosexuals, and especially among people without access to information, education and services. (for example, african american women make up 74% of all US women infected). We do not want to see the same happen in India. Before HIV/AIDS can be thought of as a " chronic manageable infection " we have a lot of work to do, to make sure that every single Indian knows how it is transmitted, what it is and is not, and what to do about it. We must make sure Indians *can* do something about it if infected. Until then it will remain a fatal disease. The fear of AIDS can lead to stigma and discrimination, but it can also impel people toward safer sex practices. That is why there is such a need for accurate information. There is no room for laziness about safe sex behavior and we must not encourage such attitudes prematurely- before treatment and prevention services are widely available. Thank you, Joya Banerjee E-mail: <jb2026@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.