Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Neurontin Marketed Illegally

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

May 14, 2004 Los Angeles Times

Pfizer to Plead Guilty to Illegal Marketing

It will pay $430 million for promoting an epilepsy drug for

unapproved uses.

(NOTE: Some of our long term members have been following the

Neurontin scandal. Neurontin IS FDA approved for treatment of

Neuropathic Pain)

Pfizer Inc. agreed to pay $430 million and plead guilty to criminal

charges for illegally marketing an epilepsy drug for unapproved uses,

U.S. prosecutors said Thursday.

The company's Warner-Lambert division promoted the drug, Neurontin,

for uses it had no scientific evidence to support and even in cases

when the drug was shown to be ineffective, prosecutors said.

For example, the company promoted Neurontin for treating bipolar

disorder, even though a study showed that a placebo worked as well as

or better than the drug for the manic-depressive illness.

" Warner-Lambert's promotional efforts were a highly organized and

deliberate attempt to circumvent federal restrictions on marketing, "

Associate Atty. Gen. McCallum said.

The $240-million criminal portion of Pfizer's payment is the second-

largest criminal fine for a healthcare fraud case, McCallum said. In

2001, TAP Pharmaceuticals, a venture of Abbott Laboratories Inc. and

Takeda Chemical Industries Ltd. agreed to pay $290 million over

charges it illegally marketed a prostate cancer drug.

Pfizer will pay the rest of the $430 million in civil fines to be

shared by state and federal agencies.

The Justice Department and the attorneys general of all 50 states

agreed to the Neurontin settlement with Pfizer.

The case originated from a lawsuit filed in late 1996 by whistle-

blower lin, who had worked for Warner-Lambert before it

was acquired by Pfizer in 2000.

lin said the company used a variety of schemes to illegally pump

up sales of Neurontin, which remains one of Pfizer's biggest sellers,

with 2003 sales of $2.7 billion.

Under federal regulations, companies may market and promote drugs

only for uses approved by the Food and Drug Administration, although

doctors can prescribe drugs to treat other illnesses.

Pharmaceutical companies have been increasingly scrutinized by

regulators for " off-label " marketing.

Pfizer said " the allegations and conduct pertain solely to Warner-

Lambert practices " before it was acquired by Pfizer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...