Guest guest Posted August 14, 2004 Report Share Posted August 14, 2004 Using track and trace technologies to combat counterfeit drugs and gain efficiencies in the supply chain Until recently, drug counterfeiting has been fairly uncommon in the United States, but the FDA reports its investigations of pharmaceutical counterfeiting have quadrupled since 2000. And, according to the World Health Organization, an estimated eight to 10% of all pharmaceuticals worldwide are believed to be counterfeit. (8/10/2004) Some countries report that nearly 50% of drugs used within their borders are counterfeit, a situation that creates a losing proposition for pharmaceutical makers and patients alike. The FDA cautions that the importation of prescription drugs from foreign countries creates a portal of entry for counterfeit drugs into the U.S. distribution system. With more than 20 counterfeit investigations in the US each year since 2000, including cases involving Lipitor and Procrit in 2003, strategies and technologies to stop counterfeiters in their tracks have solidly hit the radar screens of both pharmaceutical makers and the FDA. The FDA has stepped up its efforts to halt drug counterfeiting and diversion, forming an anti-counterfeiting task force to examine counterfeit pharmaceutical threats and potential protections in July 2003. The task force received extensive comment from security experts, federal and state law enforcement officials, technology developers, manufacturers, wholesalers, retailers, consumer groups and the general public on a broad range of ideas for deterring counterfeiters. Based on the input collected, the FDA suggested a comprehensive framework for a pharmaceutical supply chain that will be secure against modern counterfeit threats. The group issued its final report, highlighting it findings and recommendations, in February 2004. The FDA’s recommendations suggest the use of a multi-pronged approach to address weaknesses in the drug distribution system, including stricter licensing requirements for pharmacies, tougher penalties for counterfeiters, more secure business practices, increased education of consumers and health professionals, enhanced international collaboration and improved reporting systems. But the main emphasis of its recommendations centers on new technologies for tracking and tracing pharmaceutical products from the moment of creation to the time they are dispensed to a patient. Because the capabilities of counterfeiters evolve rapidly, the FDA says there is no “magic bullet” technology, however, that provides long-term assurance of drug security. Therefore, the agency recommends a combination of rapidly improving " track and trace " technologies and product authentication technologies be adopted by the industry to protect the pharmaceutical supply chain from counterfeiting. “Authentication technologies for pharmaceuticals have been sufficiently perfected that they can now serve as a critical component of any strategy to protect products against counterfeiting,” the task force concluded in its report. “Radiofrequency Identification tagging of products appears to be the most promising approach to reliable product tracking and tracing.” The agency said it believes radio frequency identification (RFID) tagging of products in the pharmaceutical supply chain will be feasible by 2007, but stopped short of proposing a rule dictating their use. In fact, the agency said it would not specify a single technology for authentication, so that potential counterfeiters could not concentrate on defeating a single approach. Instead, the task force recommended that drug packaging contain at least two different authentication technologies. According to Debbie , life sciences market expert for Zebra Technologies a provider of on-demand specialty printing solutions for business improvement, the FDA’s anti-counterfeit recommendations compliment other mandates in the industry to adopt advanced track and trace technologies. says the FDA’s unit-of-use bar coding requirements for prescription drugs and many OTC medications, which will become mandatory in April 2006, and RFID requirements by the U.S. Department of Defense and many large retailers, including Wal-Mart, Target and Albertson’s, for RFID case and pallet tagging by an array of suppliers, some of which take effect as early as 2005, are converging to help drive pharmaceutical manufacturers to quickly adopt new labeling systems. “Although the unit-of-use bar code rule was primarily developed to reduce medical errors, folks quickly realized it would also provide a track and trace methodology to monitor where products were moving throughout the distribution chain,” said. “Then, a natural extension of that was that bar code, RFID and secure media solutions could be brought together, layered and used to combat the growing counterfeit threat.” Many brand protection and security experts agree that layering several forms of product protection into packaging is the safest approach to ensure product integrity. According to , technologies that can be layered include secure label stock and laminates, taggants that hold encoded information, tamper-evident patterned adhesives, RFID tags and unit-of-use bar codes. And although many pharmaceutical makers will need to implement separate labeling systems for unit-of-use bar coding, anti-counterfeiting and RFID marking over the next two to three years, says for many, a single labeling system can satisfy all three requirements. “Bar code, RFID and security media technologies are complementary and can be combined to successfully fulfill responsibilities at all points in the pharmaceutical supply chain and provide business benefits to the labeler,” said. According to , the added benefits to track and trace technologies are many. Adding lot numbers and expiration dates to unit-of-use bar codes could streamline recall and returns management and significantly reduce the effort and cost of order, distribution, transportation and inventory management, she said. And RFID tagging allows labels to be read through multiple layers of packaging without operator intervention, which can reduce the labor and time for product handling in the supply chain. The Kearney report, which focuses on OTC drug makers, estimates RFID systems could reduce manufacturers’ labor requirements by nine percent and inventory holding costs by six percent, in addition to an 18% reduction in diversion. The group suggests that OTC manufacturers can recoup their capital outlays for RFID systems and generate a positive ROI in just more than a year by using the technology for internal inventory control and distribution operations. In addition, an Accenture study concluded that improved visibility from RFID could allow manufacturers to reduce their safety stock by up to 30%. According to , track and trace technologies could also help the industry meet pending pedigree requirements and improve and streamline prescription sample management. “There really is a lot of movement within the industry – a lot of sharing and teamwork that’s starting to evolve into addressing the problems in the supply chain,” said. “I think if we look back a year from now, we will see that companies have implemented some good systems from the current pilots that will have brought us a long way toward a truly secure supply chain.” http://www.eyeforpharma.com/index.asp?news=42862 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.