Guest guest Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 The article in The Hindu dated 6th October 2004 it was stated that " The Union Health Ministry has decided to set up an expert group to assess the state of HIV/AIDS in the country in the wake of the controversies over the numbers infected. It will include national and international experts. The Union Health Secretary, J.V.R. Prasada Rao, said the group was being set up to clear the doubts that had arisen due to misleading statements of the different stakeholders on the numbers. This had not only triggered panic but was also affecting the national programme. -------------------------------- Comment: Statistics can be misleading, unless understood in perspective. If official releases of numbers infected could also include information on number of people tested, the background of the data as well as percentage of infection would be well established. For instance if one says Maharashtra is no. 1 in HIV infected persons, Andhra Pradesh no. 2 and so on, it may only reflect on HIV awareness in these States leading to more coming forward to VCTCs for screening. What about States where people never come forward in as many numbers for testing? Does it mean we assume HIV is not prevalent in these States? So, if statistics of such numbers are not reported and understood in perspective, panic buttons are bound to be pressed, instead of planning strategies to combat the transmission rates. These numbers must be used as a guiding factor or trend, instead of arguing about its validity and accuracy or bickering on who issued these numbers to the public and on what authority. Sreeram E-mail: <setlurs01@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.