Guest guest Posted December 24, 2004 Report Share Posted December 24, 2004 Dear forum, To day I read two important postings quoting two eminent personalities in in Indian HIV scenario; Dr Kumaraswamy and Dr Mayer. These highlights the issues which we in the field of treatment are facing.But the problems are much worse in most of the places. Our problem is not the non availability of Gancyclovir or the best possible infusion pumps (or not even non availability of having ART). We face larger problem of non availability of Co- trimaxazole and non availability of doctors who are trained in HIV medicine. Availability of " Centers of excellence " in the big towns and availability of ARV in selected centers is good but we doubt how effective are they in combating general epidemic. There are centers which only breed resistance and export by starting all kind of regimens with out even considering the feasibility of continuing medications. Now eight states have started free ART with minimal training of HCWs (5 days formal training for doctors who are seeing HIV for the first time makes them capable of treating HIV and providing ARV!). It is unlikely that these centered will see many side effects of ARV in the initial period as these doctors are not trained for that. One doctor said " patients will eventually teach us side effects " . In my limited experience we are seeing many cases of immune reconstitution, lactic acidosis and other side effects of ARV in patties started on ARV and unfortunately there very little mention about them in the training modules by NACO/WHO. Interestingly WHO/NACO scaling up strategy opts a public health approach but it is being implemented through tertiary level centers! We are instructed to use WHO staging for selection of patients in tertiary level centers! This can lead to a situation of localized lymph node TB patients and patients with prolonged fever and bedridden patients being started on ARV without getting investigated and eventually end up with large abscess or die of Immune reconstitution. Interestingly this can happen in tertiary level centers now if doctors follow guide lines. We also see patients who both economically socially and hysically do better when they are off ARV. My comments are not to undermine the efficiency or need of ART but to promote implementation of proper ART program Ajith E-mail: <trc_ajisudha@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.