CDS Will Not Kill Parastes In Cells

[Guest guest]

It does appear CDS does not work on malaria.  I was speaking today with Dr. Ron

who just returned from a few days seeing Jim in the Dominican Republic.  Dr. Ron

said that there were other attempts to treat malaria and the CDS did not work on

it.

 

I think the conclusion to be drawn from this is that CDS does not work on the

malaria parasite, at least not like they have been trying to use it.  I do not

think it is possible to conclude CDS does not make it into the blood.  There are

too many examples of CDS helping cancer and lung congestion.

 

 

[Guest guest]

Bring back DTD for malaria. What is worse? Having thousands, if not millions,

of people sick and dying. Or some delicate upset of the environment? I'll take

saving lives.

The environment is amazingly resilient.

If you read back far enough, malaria was almost gone, when the US and then the

rest of the world banned DDT.

So were bedbugs... Now turning into an epidemic again.

In special cases, get out the " big guns " - DDT!

Jan

P.S. Thanks to Lovistar for some of the DDT info.

>

> It does appear CDS does not work on malaria.  I was speaking today with Dr.

Ron

> who just returned from a few days seeing Jim in the Dominican Republic.  Dr.

Ron

> said that there were other attempts to treat malaria and the CDS did not work

on

> it.

>  

> I think the conclusion to be drawn from this is that CDS does not work on the

> malaria parasite, at least not like they have been trying to use it.  I do not

> think it is possible to conclude CDS does not make it into the blood.  There

are

> too many examples of CDS helping cancer and lung congestion.

>  

>

>  

>

[Guest guest]

Hi, Jan!I agree. I don´t like poisons but rather that then bedbugs and birdmites sufferers and offcourse malaria...

Thanks for your positive input on this site!

Cecilia

From: jan.morin28 <no_reply >bird mites Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 11:56 PMSubject: Re: CDS Will Not Kill Parastes In Cells

Bring back DTD for malaria. What is worse? Having thousands, if not millions, of people sick and dying. Or some delicate upset of the environment? I'll take saving lives.The environment is amazingly resilient.If you read back far enough, malaria was almost gone, when the US and then the rest of the world banned DDT.So were bedbugs... Now turning into an epidemic again.In special cases, get out the "big guns" - DDT! Jan :)P.S. Thanks to Lovistar for some of the DDT info.>> It does appear CDS does not work on malaria. I was speaking today with Dr. Ron> who just returned from a few days seeing Jim in the Dominican Republic. Dr. Ron> said that there

were other attempts to treat malaria and the CDS did not work on> it.> > I think the conclusion to be drawn from this is that CDS does not work on the> malaria parasite, at least not like they have been trying to use it. I do not> think it is possible to conclude CDS does not make it into the blood. There are> too many examples of CDS helping cancer and lung congestion.> > > >

[Guest guest]

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=ddt-use-to-combat-malaria

http://silent-spring.com/index.html

>

>

> > >

> > > It does appear CDS does not work on malaria.  I was speaking today with

Dr. Ron

> > > who just returned from a few days seeing Jim in the Dominican Republic. 

Dr. Ron

> > > said that there were other attempts to treat malaria and the CDS did not

work on

> > > it.

> > >  

> > > I think the conclusion to be drawn from this is that CDS does not work on

the

> > > malaria parasite, at least not like they have been trying to use it.  I do

not

> > > think it is possible to conclude CDS does not make it into the blood. 

There are

> > > too many examples of CDS helping cancer and lung congestion.

> > >  

> > >

> > >  

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

DDT was not banned because it upset the environment...it causes serious health issues such as birth defects, breast cancer, infertility, and inhibits brain development, etc...

Plus once sprayed, it hangs around for decades affecting the health of new generations.

Finding safer alternatives would be the best bet...although it is troubling that there is such a bug problem now.

Regression is not a solution in my eyes.

On Feb 8, 2012 5:39 AM, " healinghope " <mfrreman@...> wrote:

 

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=ddt-use-to-combat-malaria

http://silent-spring.com/index.html> >

> >> > Bring back DTD for...

[Guest guest]

DDT is still approved by WHO and used in malaria ridden areas. This decision

still controversial. To use DDT as a broad spectrum spray would be going back

not going forward. The cure for malaria and other disease would be going

forward! By the way this post is about CDS, which has nothing to do with

pesticides.

http://www.npr.org/tablet/#story/?storyId=6083944

http://www.genesis2forum.org/index.php?option=com_kunena & func=view & catid=16 & id=8\

260 & Itemid=66

> > >

> > > Bring back DTD for...

>

[Guest guest]

CDS not effective curing malaria ingested orally. This came as a surprise to me,

as this information was just released by Jim Humbles site. And as many of you

know, Jim was reporting great success with it over the last couple of

months..and letting us know the benefits of it's use, [but it seems those were

the IV methods of using it.] But when it was used orally on Malaria patients,

[Parasite Infestations], it miserable failed, where as the MMS is well known to

cure it in a matter of hours.... However on the bright side topical

applications with CDS is proving more successful than MMS1. I would assume it is

because there is no citric acid left with CDS. Jim made a new video making CDS

with a simpler, safer method. Just search CDS MMS on you tube to watch.

The jest of his report is:

~The CDS works well for application given by IV, and on wound infections, such

as snake bites, spider bites, or Ray stings, if taken at higher ppm.

~But taken " orally " , it just DOES NOT get into the blood stream like MMS does.

> > > >

> > > > Bring back DTD for...

> >

>

[Guest guest]

My mom used to put it out in the lids of bottles for the mice and rats to feast upon. It looked like oatmeal. I wouldn't use it... From: "Elissa " <elissarachel@...>bird mites Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 8:33:43 AMSubject: Re: Re: CDS Will Not Kill Parastes In Cells

DDT was not banned because it upset the environment...it causes serious health issues such as birth defects, breast cancer, infertility, and inhibits brain development, etc...

Plus once sprayed, it hangs around for decades affecting the health of new generations.

Finding safer alternatives would be the best bet...although it is troubling that there is such a bug problem now.

Regression is not a solution in my eyes.

On Feb 8, 2012 5:39 AM, "healinghope" <mfrreman@...> wrote:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=ddt-use-to-combat-malaria

http://silent-spring.com/index.html> >

> >> > Bring back DTD for...

[Guest guest]

Some of the co infections with Lyme are malaria like, very close similarities.

Like Lyme is a cousin to syphliss, babaesiosis is a cousin to malaria.

Babesiosis, Malaria's Cousin, Can Strike Here

http://lymeproject.com/lyme_news/babesiosis-malarias-cousin-can-strike-

>

> Lyme can outsmart the immune system. I believe MMS1 breaks through the blood

> brain barrier, basing that on my healing process alone. Agree that chlorine

> dioxide gives the human body the resources to jump start the immune system,

also

> agree that CDS is still a beneficial player. I would think especially

> topically. Been very fortunate to not have stomach upset with MMS, except in

the

> beginning during detox, or the herx if you will.

> https://sites.google.com/site/marylandlyme/lab-tests/laboratory-tests--tom-ge

> So, while the first problem with Lyme disease tests is in the way they are

> promoted, the second problem is the way the tests are primed to recognize

> laboratory strains of Bb, rather than wild types. Third, the Lyme spirochete

can

> hide in the human body, and fool the immune system into thinking it isn't

there.

> So, no antibodies are produced, resulting in negative tests. Stealth

technology

> isn't new, it evolved millions of years ago by the first bacteria that evaded

it's host defenses.

> > > > >

> > > > > Bring back DTD for...

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

http://www.canlyme.com/tom.html

The Structure of the Lyme Bacteria

The structure of the Lyme spirochete is unlike any other bacteria that has ever

been studied before. It is one of the largest of the spirochetes (0.25 microns x

50 microns) It is as long, as a fine human hair is thick. Borrelia burgdorferi

is a highly motile bacteria, it can swim extremely efficiently through both

blood and tissue because of internal propulsion. It is propelled by an internal

arrangement of flagella, bundled together, that runs the length of the bacteria

from tip to tip. Like other Borrelia bacteria Borrelia burgdorferi has a three

layer cell wall which helps determine the spiral shape of the bacteria. What

makes this bacteria different from other species, is that it also has a clear

gel-like coat of glyco-proteins which surround the bacteria. This extra layer is

sometimes called the Slime Layer or S-layer. (See diagram 1) (45,46,59)

This means: This extra layer of glyco-proteins may act like a stealthy coat of

armor that protects and hides the bacteria from the immune system. The human

immune system uses proteins that are on the surface of the bacteria as markers,

and sends attacking antibodies and killer T-cells to those markers, called outer

surface protein antigens (OSP antigens). This nearly invisible layer is rarely

seen in washed cultures, but can be seen regularly in tissue biopsies.(46)

The Lyme bacteria is different from other bacteria in its arrangement of DNA.

Most bacteria have distinct chromosomes that are found floating around inside

the cytoplasm. When the bacteria starts to divide and split in two, the

chromosomes divide and the new copies of the chromosomes enter the new cell. The

arrangement of DNA within Borrelia burgdorferi is radically different. It is

arranged along the inside of the inner membrane. It looks something like a net

embedded just underneath the skin of the bacteria. (46)

This means: We really don't understand the mechanisms of how Bb regulates its

genetic material during its division.

Another unique feature to Borrelia burgdorferi are Blebs. This bacteria

replicates specific genes, and inserts them into its own cell wall, and then

pinches off that part of its cell membrane, and sends the bleb into the host.

Why it does this we don't know. But we do know that these blebs can irritate our

immune system. Dr. Claude Garon of Rocky Mountain Laboratories has shown that

there is a precise mechanism that regulates the ratio of the different types of

blebs that are shed. (46) In other bacteria the appearance of blebs often means

the bacteria can share genetic information between themselves. We don't know if

this is possible with Borrelia species. There have been reports of a granular

form of Borrelia, which can grow to full size spirochetes, and reproduce. These

granules are so small that they can be filtered and separated from live adult

spirochetes by means of a micro-pore filter. (Stealth Pathogens Lida Mattman

Ph.D. 66)

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Bring back DTD for...

> > > >

> > >

> >

>