Guest guest Posted March 24, 2006 Report Share Posted March 24, 2006 : Pro: cheaper and not dependant on resupply or complications of transporting tanks, set up of cascade (pig tails) is not difficult. minimum 3 large tanks to cascade to optimal pressures. The cost benefit ratio is dependant on the volume of tanks needing refilling. Con: can be dangerous in the wrong hands.....heat can be a serious issue with rapid filling as well again.... The cost benefit ratio is dependant on the volume of tanks also routine hydrostatic testing of the tanks can (go longer than controlled by regulations). This can be determined buy the stamped information on the tank itself usually the neck, I suspect the coding varies from country to country even colors do, please take the Russian ones back please....black that's just not right...lol. I have fabricated a device that is a " cheater of sorts " , from " H " or " M " size tanks to D regular or Jumbos or E size, equalises pressure but really helps out in a pinch, say in the scenario of the entrapped victim (building collapse or in a vehicle) or Greaber hung over in a hotel room! I am a bit challenged in the computer area, I have no clue as to how to upload a picture of the device to shared files but will happily shoot anyone the picture of it for the asking, or if someone has the ability I will send and it can be placed in photos. cheers and keep on sucking wind. Wilf Cascade O2 filling station > > Hey anybody is filling his own oxygen cylinders ? > > What's the pro and the con of it ? > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2006 Report Share Posted March 26, 2006 The O2 cascade system is not so much an issue in N-A You can sit down with a catalogue and order hte parts on a monday afternoon And have the whole thing assembled Friday Not so true in the rest of the world where these installations are basicaly out of the law (Certainly in France) The bigest issue IMHO Is resisting the temptation of filling empty cylinders Read : Contaminated Wilf Mackie <w.mackie@...> wrote: : Pro: cheaper and not dependant on resupply or complications of transporting tanks, set up of cascade (pig tails) is not difficult. minimum 3 large tanks to cascade to optimal pressures. The cost benefit ratio is dependant on the volume of tanks needing refilling. Con: can be dangerous in the wrong hands.....heat can be a serious issue with rapid filling as well again.... The cost benefit ratio is dependant on the volume of tanks also routine hydrostatic testing of the tanks can (go longer than controlled by regulations). This can be determined buy the stamped information on the tank itself usually the neck, I suspect the coding varies from country to country even colors do, please take the Russian ones back please....black that's just not right...lol. I have fabricated a device that is a " cheater of sorts " , from " H " or " M " size tanks to D regular or Jumbos or E size, equalises pressure but really helps out in a pinch, say in the scenario of the entrapped victim (building collapse or in a vehicle) or Greaber hung over in a hotel room! I am a bit challenged in the computer area, I have no clue as to how to upload a picture of the device to shared files but will happily shoot anyone the picture of it for the asking, or if someone has the ability I will send and it can be placed in photos. cheers and keep on sucking wind. Wilf Cascade O2 filling station > > Hey anybody is filling his own oxygen cylinders ? > > What's the pro and the con of it ? > > Member Information: List owner: Ian Sharpe Owner@... Editor: Ross Boardman Editor@... ALL list admin messages (subscriptions & unsubscriptions) should be sent to the list owner. Post message: egroups Please visit our website http://www.remotemedics.co.uk Regards The Remote Medics Team Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2006 Report Share Posted March 26, 2006 : Thank you, indeed your statement concerning availability of fittings is really a non-issue in NA, since your post and question to the group I have undertaken a bit more research. It is becoming more evident that restrictions concerning this activity are becoming more stringent, as one " gas law challenged " individual caused himself grievous injury (no not in B.C.) regulations are being reviewed presently in my part of the world, the contamination issue is a strong argument for " the parties with vested interests i.e. commonly called the manufacture) may use this as argument to control the market place so to speak, perhaps just a money grab... you choose? I was unaware of the regulations in France, my ignorance, is France used very much for support work for off shore deployments? For discussion sake, contamination issue may be a bit of a red herring in my humble opinion other than dust contamination. I can see no other possible way that contamination could occur if source gas is from a reputable supplier, and field testing for trace gasses would be very difficult to say the least or even prove? you are without doubt an expert in this field, so I would like to ask? To your recollection have you ever heard of a case (anywhere) where contamination of Oxygen (medical) has ever affected a patient outcome or in fact documented or even suspected? I have heard and read about bubble humidifiers (wash bottles) being contaminated from bacteria, but never a bacterial vector (aerobic bacteria) that could possibly survive in hi pressure containment devices, without a supply H20 and some form of media. I have read of neonatal isolet humidifier (one filled with isoproponal) hitting the court room floor, yeh gads. I digress. If you have any links I would be most appreciative especially the one you have mentioned below I do not have a great connection to the net right now a link would be great interest, as without reviewing this reg I may entirely premature.....my ex wife always told me that! > The biggest issue IMHO > Is resisting the temptation of filling empty cylinders > Read : Contaminated Thanks very much in advance. Wilf ps I am happy to announce that I was nominated for funniest poster on another listserver site, very fortunate for myself that Rod and Tom are not invited, I just cannot stand the competition, but won in the catagoree for worst speler, hans down. cheers all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2006 Report Share Posted March 26, 2006 Wilf Mackie <w.mackie@...> wrote: For discussion sake, contamination issue may be a bit of a red herring in my humble opinion other than dust contamination. I can see no other possible way that contamination could occur if source gas is from a reputable supplier, and field testing for trace gasses would be very difficult to say the least or even prove? you are without doubt an expert in this field, so I would like to ask? To your recollection have you ever heard of a case (anywhere) where contamination of Oxygen (medical) has ever affected a patient outcome or in fact documented or even suspected? Hey ! Oh ! Don't you go calling me names (expert!!!) Just because I read the package insert... Both in French and Anglo, mind you ... one rainy morning The contamination that concerns us the most As the refilling goes Is humidity contamination (not really dirt or anything else... as most of us have the reflex of keeping the valves closed and clean) Humidity, in real theory, accelerates/creates the corrosion process Having : - Steel (99.... %) - Oxygen (99.... %) - Water ... at this stage any percentage precent at room air I assume equilibration is rather instaneous if valve left open for any amount of time ! ? Which brings on the question: how much more expensive would a regulator with an integrated minimum pressure (50 PSI?) valve would cost ? As for how many catastrophic failure (explosion) of oxygen cylinders where brough on by oxydation damage ? - Taken form the total number (near 0) of medical oxygen cylinder failure - The ones that were not dropped (was it the drop, the corrosion or a faithfull combination of both ?) - The ones that had a faulty valve - Calculated only from the group of medical oxygen cylinders that were artis(un)analy filled ? This said Routinely, SCUBA bottles and SCBAs are left open to Atmosphere and in usually more humid (and salty) environments than MOST of us operate in. So real theoreticaly, that's where the refilling legislation should hit first. Logicaly)))) Organic contaminants are more of an issue with air cylinders Carbon monoxyde being the most common, stupid and deplorable one Otherwise most organic contaminants are more likely to be traced back to poor mask fits from SCBAs than actual cylinder contamination. As medical oxygen organic contamination is concerned. I venture to guess that their is not manby bacterias that can survive the cylinder environments and the only potential victim of these theoretical contaminations could only be vented immunodepressed Pts... who get pneumonias no matter what With a slew of contamination source current to the daily occurence level That would be hard proven to be originating from a compressed contaminated medical oxygen cylinder Even one that would have been refilled by some Shlomo in some hospital cellar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.