Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Statistics

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hi can anyone guide me regarding where to read Statistics form apart form adult

and child stats 2009 and 2003. They are huge documents do we need to do all

values??????????

Regards

Margi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HI DOC MARGIyou can go through the summary parthere are the important points courtesy of DR IRFAN who cleared first part. Mand Incisors - >40% 2 canals but separate foramina in only 1%

Maxillary 4 – 74% >1 canal >1 foramina

Maxillary 5- 75% 1 canal and 1 foramina

Alcoholics in UK – Men – 72% Women – 57%

94 % OF COMBINED POPULATION OF ENGLAND, WALES AND NORTHERN IRELAND WERE DENTATE

EDENTATE IS 6% England 12% Scotland

17 % HAS HEALTHY PERIODONTAL GUMS.

10% HAS EXCELLENT ORAL HEALTH

31%HAS TOOTH DECAY.

45% OF ADULTS HAS PERIODONTAL POCKETING EXCEEDING 4MM.

84%OF DENTATE ADULTS HAS ATLEAST ONE FILLED TOOTH.

ADULTS AGED UNDER 45 WERE LESS LIKELY TO HAVE ANY FILLINGS.

37% OF DENTATE ADULTS HAD ARTIFICIAL CROWNS.

66%OF DENTATE ADULTS HAD VISIBLE PLAQUE.

CANCER survival in 65 year old: Stage 1->85% Stage 4-> 10%

stage1 males: 90% survival 1st year stage 4 : 45%

`65% survival 5 year 16%

<55% survival 10 years 12%

Submucosal fibrosis (due to betel quid chewing) 10% chances of malignancy in 10 – 15 years

Tooth Wear (Attrition) 16-24yr old – 36% 65 yr and over – 89%

Percentage of population having type 1 hypersensitivity – 20 – 30%

Oral Cancer in UK – 2%

Squamous Cell Carcinoma – 90% of total oral cancers

0.2 – 8% in Europe and USA Men- 58%

CHILDREN DENTAL HEALTH SURVEY

Caries FREE 5 YEAR OLD IN ENGLAND AND WALES IS 55%

33% active caries – 2006/2007

38% OF 12 YEAR OLD IN UK AND WALES HAD CARIES EXPERIENCE IN PERMANENT DENTISTION.

54%OF 9 YEAR OLD NEED ORTHODONTIC EXPERIENCE.

33% boys and and 19% girls have experienced trauma at 12 years age

5 year old trauma 30-40% at toddler stage

More than 50% <4years trauma to primary tooth affects underlying developing successor

Tooth erosion: 6 year old 52% 15 year old 27%

Oral Cancers in uk: 2% which are 2000. Half die i.e. 1000

Percentage of fluoridated water in uk: 10%

Percentage of people with allergy in uk 10%

% of bacterial load decrease by cleaning – upto 80%

Gingivitis : 17-24yr olds - 77% 25+ - 87%

Periodontitis: 17-24 yr olds – 3% 25+ - 64%

Percentage of plaque – 72%

Percentage of calculus – 73%

%age of fissure sealants that fail and get carious >85% - after one year >50% - after 5 yearsBEST REGARDSEBTISAM From: doc_margi <doc_margi@...> Sent: Sunday, 12 February 2012, 12:19 Subject: Statistics

Hi can anyone guide me regarding where to read Statistics form apart form adult and child stats 2009 and 2003. They are huge documents do we need to do all values??????????

Regards

Margi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does statistics actually form 30% of the exam?MiralOn 13 Feb 2012, at 08:51, bhavani prasanna <bhavani_prasanna@...> wrote:

is this stats sufficient then,,, plz tell ,if not where we can read statistics bhavani From: Kanika Kohli <kanika_sahil@...> " " < > Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:21 AM Subject: Re: Statistics

Thanks alot for providing us this info.God bless u. From: ebtessam elhamalawy <ebtessamhamalawy@...> " " < > Sent: Sunday, 12 February 2012 2:58 PM Subject: Re: Statistics

HI DOC MARGIyou can go through the summary parthere are the important points courtesy of DR IRFAN who cleared first part. Mand Incisors - >40% 2 canals but separate foramina in only 1%

Maxillary 4 – 74% >1 canal >1 foramina

Maxillary 5- 75% 1 canal and 1 foramina

Alcoholics in UK – Men – 72% Women – 57%

94 % OF COMBINED POPULATION OF ENGLAND, WALES AND NORTHERN IRELAND WERE DENTATE

EDENTATE IS 6% England 12% Scotland

17 % HAS HEALTHY PERIODONTAL GUMS.

10% HAS EXCELLENT ORAL HEALTH

31%HAS TOOTH DECAY.

45% OF ADULTS HAS PERIODONTAL POCKETING EXCEEDING 4MM.

84%OF DENTATE ADULTS HAS ATLEAST ONE FILLED TOOTH.

ADULTS AGED UNDER 45 WERE LESS LIKELY TO HAVE ANY FILLINGS.

37% OF DENTATE ADULTS HAD ARTIFICIAL CROWNS.

66%OF DENTATE ADULTS HAD VISIBLE PLAQUE.

CANCER survival in 65 year old: Stage 1->85% Stage 4-> 10%

stage1 males: 90% survival 1st year stage 4 : 45%

`65% survival 5 year 16%

<55% survival 10 years 12%

Submucosal fibrosis (due to betel quid chewing) 10% chances of malignancy in 10 – 15 years

Tooth Wear (Attrition) 16-24yr old – 36% 65 yr and over – 89%

Percentage of population having type 1 hypersensitivity – 20 – 30%

Oral Cancer in UK – 2%

Squamous Cell Carcinoma – 90% of total oral cancers

0.2 – 8% in Europe and USA Men- 58%

CHILDREN DENTAL HEALTH SURVEY

Caries FREE 5 YEAR OLD IN ENGLAND AND WALES IS 55%

33% active caries – 2006/2007

38% OF 12 YEAR OLD IN UK AND WALES HAD CARIES EXPERIENCE IN PERMANENT DENTISTION.

54%OF 9 YEAR OLD NEED ORTHODONTIC EXPERIENCE.

33% boys and and 19% girls have experienced trauma at 12 years age

5 year old trauma 30-40% at toddler stage

More than 50% <4years trauma to primary tooth affects underlying developing successor

Tooth erosion: 6 year old 52% 15 year old 27%

Oral Cancers in uk: 2% which are 2000. Half die i.e. 1000

Percentage of fluoridated water in uk: 10%

Percentage of people with allergy in uk 10%

% of bacterial load decrease by cleaning – upto 80%

Gingivitis : 17-24yr olds - 77% 25+ - 87%

Periodontitis: 17-24 yr olds – 3% 25+ - 64%

Percentage of plaque – 72%

Percentage of calculus – 73%

%age of fissure sealants that fail and get carious >85% - after one year >50% - after 5 yearsBEST REGARDSEBTISAM From: doc_margi <doc_margi@...> Sent: Sunday, 12 February 2012, 12:19 Subject: Statistics

Hi can anyone guide me regarding where to read Statistics form apart form adult and child stats 2009 and 2003. They are huge documents do we need to do all values??????????

Regards

Margi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

What about sensitivity n specificity?ThanksOn 22 Feb 2012, at 13:09, "rpmk17" <rpmk17@...> wrote:

Asa!

Well a T test is usually conducted to see if a difference in between two samples is statistically significant when tested for one variable...my understanding is that if we take 2 samples for example males and females and see a variable like for example caries(variable can be anything)...and we want to see if there is any statistically significant difference in between the two...then we will do a T test.For this we make a hypothesis(supposition).It may be like

yes males and females have same caries incidence

no(null) males and females do not have same caries incidence.

Percentile is less confusing:)

When we say we got 80% marks or 80% of children have caries then that means 80 out of 100.

But when we say 80 Percentile it means that our marks are 79 or 80 percent more than the people who sat the exam...or in other words 80% people had less marks than us.Now the total number of candidates can be anything.

I hope these makes sense.Feel free to correct me if I am wrong since I am no expert on stats:D

>

>

> HI ALL

>

> I have been through statstics but can`t properly understand either the:

>

> 1. student T test or the 2. Percentile

> I would be very grateful if anyone can give me a simpler explanation.

>

> best regards

> ebtisam

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I hate stats:P...but ok...so sensitivity is according to definition

number of true positives that are correctly identified by a test and specificity

is the number of true negatives identified by a test....so its better for a test

to be sensitive rather than just specific...sensitivity of a test is the

probability that it will surely give us a positive result in the end when we

compare it to a gold standard.For eg if drinking sugary drinks is proved to give

you caries then a test in which we give children who don't brush their teeth

sugary drinks is a test with high sensitivity...meaning it has a high likelihood

of giving us a positive result....something they call true positive(the patient

has caries and the test is positive)

On the other hand if you do a test in which you give children sugary drinks but

the children are brushing their teeth and have a good oral hygiene...then there

is a high likelihood that the children wont get caries...this means that this

test has high specificity meaning the test is producing a true negative

result(the patient does not have caries and the test is negative) when tested on

a sample which was initially normal.

So I think that would mean sensitivity is inversely proportional to specificity.

So sensitivity is the prob that a test says that a person has the disease and

when we do the test/experiment we find out it is fact that the person has a

disease.

Specificity is when the test says the person doesn't have the disease and when

we do the test/experiment it is a fact that the person doesn't have the disease.

Hope this helps!

> > >

> > >

> > > HI ALL

> > >

> > > I have been through statstics but can`t properly understand either the:

> > >

> > > 1. student T test or the 2. Percentile

> > > I would be very grateful if anyone can give me a simpler explanation.

> > >

> > > best regards

> > > ebtisam

> > >

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot,from where can we study such things?Sent from my iPadOn 23 Feb 2012, at 11:39, "rpmk17" <rpmk17@...> wrote:

As much as I hate stats:P...but ok...so sensitivity is according to definition number of true positives that are correctly identified by a test and specificity is the number of true negatives identified by a test....so its better for a test to be sensitive rather than just specific...sensitivity of a test is the probability that it will surely give us a positive result in the end when we compare it to a gold standard.For eg if drinking sugary drinks is proved to give you caries then a test in which we give children who don't brush their teeth sugary drinks is a test with high sensitivity...meaning it has a high likelihood of giving us a positive result....something they call true positive(the patient has caries and the test is positive)

On the other hand if you do a test in which you give children sugary drinks but the children are brushing their teeth and have a good oral hygiene...then there is a high likelihood that the children wont get caries...this means that this test has high specificity meaning the test is producing a true negative result(the patient does not have caries and the test is negative) when tested on a sample which was initially normal.

So I think that would mean sensitivity is inversely proportional to specificity.

So sensitivity is the prob that a test says that a person has the disease and when we do the test/experiment we find out it is fact that the person has a disease.

Specificity is when the test says the person doesn't have the disease and when we do the test/experiment it is a fact that the person doesn't have the disease.

Hope this helps!

> > >

> > >

> > > HI ALL

> > >

> > > I have been through statstics but can`t properly understand either the:

> > >

> > > 1. student T test or the 2. Percentile

> > > I would be very grateful if anyone can give me a simpler explanation.

> > >

> > > best regards

> > > ebtisam

> > >

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone remember how specificity n sensitivity were tested in ore?sample of questionsSent from my iPadOn 23 Feb 2012, at 11:39, "rpmk17" <rpmk17@...> wrote:

As much as I hate stats:P...but ok...so sensitivity is according to definition number of true positives that are correctly identified by a test and specificity is the number of true negatives identified by a test....so its better for a test to be sensitive rather than just specific...sensitivity of a test is the probability that it will surely give us a positive result in the end when we compare it to a gold standard.For eg if drinking sugary drinks is proved to give you caries then a test in which we give children who don't brush their teeth sugary drinks is a test with high sensitivity...meaning it has a high likelihood of giving us a positive result....something they call true positive(the patient has caries and the test is positive)

On the other hand if you do a test in which you give children sugary drinks but the children are brushing their teeth and have a good oral hygiene...then there is a high likelihood that the children wont get caries...this means that this test has high specificity meaning the test is producing a true negative result(the patient does not have caries and the test is negative) when tested on a sample which was initially normal.

So I think that would mean sensitivity is inversely proportional to specificity.

So sensitivity is the prob that a test says that a person has the disease and when we do the test/experiment we find out it is fact that the person has a disease.

Specificity is when the test says the person doesn't have the disease and when we do the test/experiment it is a fact that the person doesn't have the disease.

Hope this helps!

> > >

> > >

> > > HI ALL

> > >

> > > I have been through statstics but can`t properly understand either the:

> > >

> > > 1. student T test or the 2. Percentile

> > > I would be very grateful if anyone can give me a simpler explanation.

> > >

> > > best regards

> > > ebtisam

> > >

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HI NEDIA 1. check the adult dental health survey for 20092, I will send u the stat ppt.bets regardsebtisam From: Nebia Leila imene <imene.nebia@...> Sent: Wednesday, 29 February

2012, 13:35 Subject: statistics

hi everyone,

want to know where should we read the statistics from, try to do the feedbacks but I don't have a proper source of information.

thanks for your answers.

regards.

imene.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

these are helpful statistics docadult survey is very imp From: Nebia Leila imene <imene.nebia@...> Sent: Wednesday, 29 February 2012, 13:35 Subject: statistics

hi everyone,

want to know where should we read the statistics from, try to do the feedbacks but I don't have a proper source of information.

thanks for your answers.

regards.

imene.

3 of 3 File(s)

ORE part one stats and Law ethics.pdf

stattistics.docx

Adult health statistics.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...