Guest guest Posted February 23, 2012 Report Share Posted February 23, 2012 1. It should be cantilever bridge as these are contraindicated in deep bites(which could be a clinical feature of class 2 div 2)2.cantilever bridge has abutment at only one end,with other end of pontic remaining unattached so i think it should be both premolars.correct me if am wrong From: sualehuddinkhan <drsualehkhan@...> Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2012 10:33 PM Subject: Bridges ORE part 1 Hi Guyz! Can you please help me on these.... Question 1: In a class II.2 malocclusion, which bridge design would be contraindicated for a missing lateral upper incisor? A.Cantilever bridge B.land bridge Question 2: Which is the best cantilever bridge design for missing maxillary canine? Abutment on A.Both premolars B.Lateral and central incisor C.Lateral incisor D.First premolar I would appreciate if you guyz can explain as well. Kind Regards Sualeh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2012 Report Share Posted February 23, 2012 hiii Kanika, For 1) answer i thought maryland bridges.. debonding due to deep bite would be a problem It would realy help if you correct me and explain us your answer. thank youAanalOn Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Kanika Kohli <kanika_sahil@...> wrote: 1. It should be cantilever bridge as these are contraindicated in deep bites(which could be a clinical feature of class 2 div 2) 2.cantilever bridge has abutment at only one end,with other end of pontic remaining unattached so i think it should be both premolars.correct me if am wrong From: sualehuddinkhan <drsualehkhan@...> Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2012 10:33 PM Subject: Bridges ORE part 1 Hi Guyz! Can you please help me on these.... Question 1: In a class II.2 malocclusion, which bridge design would be contraindicated for a missing lateral upper incisor? A.Cantilever bridge B.land bridge Question 2: Which is the best cantilever bridge design for missing maxillary canine? Abutment on A.Both premolars B.Lateral and central incisor C.Lateral incisor D.First premolar I would appreciate if you guyz can explain as well. Kind Regards Sualeh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 THE ANSWER TO ONE IN MY OPI IS A one of the indications for A is a favourable occlusion plus it causes tipping movement to the abutment and rotation as well ,not to mention the preparation for such unideal labial segment which will complicate the whole procedure so land is considered as a less invasive short term treatment until an proper orth treatment take place .. for 2 is b that is to avoid the preparation for a narrow and small tooth as the lateral and it is completely unnecessary as long as there are two sound pre on the same side do you agree with me guys From: sualehuddinkhan <drsualehkhan@...> Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2012, 22:33Subject: Bridges ORE part 1 Hi Guyz! Can you please help me on these....Question 1: In a class II.2 malocclusion, which bridge design would be contraindicated for a missing lateral upper incisor?A.Cantilever bridgeB.land bridgeQuestion 2: Which is the best cantilever bridge design for missing maxillary canine? Abutment onA.Both premolarsB.Lateral and central incisorC.Lateral incisorD.First premolarI would appreciate if you guyz can explain as well.Kind RegardsSualeh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 I Agree with first but for second cantilever has pontic connected to retainer at one end only.so it has to be premolars but nt sure... From: Areej Abbas <areej.aldura@...> " " < > Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012 2:49 AM Subject: Re: Bridges ORE part 1 THE ANSWER TO ONE IN MY OPI IS A one of the indications for A is a favourable occlusion plus it causes tipping movement to the abutment and rotation as well ,not to mention the preparation for such unideal labial segment which will complicate the whole procedure so land is considered as a less invasive short term treatment until an proper orth treatment take place .. for 2 is b that is to avoid the preparation for a narrow and small tooth as the lateral and it is completely unnecessary as long as there are two sound pre on the same side do you agree with me guys From: sualehuddinkhan <drsualehkhan@...> Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2012, 22:33Subject: Bridges ORE part 1 Hi Guyz! Can you please help me on these....Question 1: In a class II.2 malocclusion, which bridge design would be contraindicated for a missing lateral upper incisor?A.Cantilever bridgeB.land bridgeQuestion 2: Which is the best cantilever bridge design for missing maxillary canine? Abutment onA.Both premolarsB.Lateral and central incisorC.Lateral incisorD.First premolarI would appreciate if you guyz can explain as well.Kind RegardsSualeh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2012 Report Share Posted February 26, 2012 at the subconscious i still remember at postqualification training time that canine has a long root it needs two teeth as a abutment for replacement in canti ...though i very welcome a third op From: Kanika Kohli <kanika_sahil@...>" " < > Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012, 2:55Subject: Re: Bridges ORE part 1 I Agree with first but for second cantilever has pontic connected to retainer at one end only.so it has to be premolars but nt sure... From: Areej Abbas <areej.aldura@...>" " < > Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012 2:49 AMSubject: Re: Bridges ORE part 1 THE ANSWER TO ONE IN MY OPI IS A one of the indications for A is a favourable occlusion plus it causes tipping movement to the abutment and rotation as well ,not to mention the preparation for such unideal labial segment which will complicate the whole procedure so land is considered as a less invasive short term treatment until an proper orth treatment take place .. for 2 is b that is to avoid the preparation for a narrow and small tooth as the lateral and it is completely unnecessary as long as there are two sound pre on the same side do you agree with me guys From: sualehuddinkhan <drsualehkhan@...> Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2012, 22:33Subject: Bridges ORE part 1 Hi Guyz! Can you please help me on these....Question 1: In a class II.2 malocclusion, which bridge design would be contraindicated for a missing lateral upper incisor?A.Cantilever bridgeB.land bridgeQuestion 2: Which is the best cantilever bridge design for missing maxillary canine? Abutment onA.Both premolarsB.Lateral and central incisorC.Lateral incisorD.First premolarI would appreciate if you guyz can explain as well.Kind RegardsSualeh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 i feel u both are telling abt the same option...premolars.......tht seem to b rt considering aesthetics...too.. From: Areej Abbas <areej.aldura@...> " " < > Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012 3:58 AM Subject: Re: Bridges ORE part 1 at the subconscious i still remember at postqualification training time that canine has a long root it needs two teeth as a abutment for replacement in canti ...though i very welcome a third op From: Kanika Kohli <kanika_sahil@...>" " < > Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012, 2:55Subject: Re: Bridges ORE part 1 I Agree with first but for second cantilever has pontic connected to retainer at one end only.so it has to be premolars but nt sure... From: Areej Abbas <areej.aldura@...>" " < > Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012 2:49 AMSubject: Re: Bridges ORE part 1 THE ANSWER TO ONE IN MY OPI IS A one of the indications for A is a favourable occlusion plus it causes tipping movement to the abutment and rotation as well ,not to mention the preparation for such unideal labial segment which will complicate the whole procedure so land is considered as a less invasive short term treatment until an proper orth treatment take place .. for 2 is b that is to avoid the preparation for a narrow and small tooth as the lateral and it is completely unnecessary as long as there are two sound pre on the same side do you agree with me guys From: sualehuddinkhan <drsualehkhan@...> Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2012, 22:33Subject: Bridges ORE part 1 Hi Guyz! Can you please help me on these....Question 1: In a class II.2 malocclusion, which bridge design would be contraindicated for a missing lateral upper incisor?A.Cantilever bridgeB.land bridgeQuestion 2: Which is the best cantilever bridge design for missing maxillary canine? Abutment onA.Both premolarsB.Lateral and central incisorC.Lateral incisorD.First premolarI would appreciate if you guyz can explain as well.Kind RegardsSualeh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 For class 2 div 2 which design is contraindicated for missing upper lateral incisor Is it land or cantilever?BalsamSent from my iPadOn 27 Feb 2012, at 09:46, Sajithakumari Sivaprem <ssajithakumari@...> wrote: i feel u both are telling abt the same option...premolars.......tht seem to b rt considering aesthetics...too.. From: Areej Abbas <areej.aldura@...> " " < > Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012 3:58 AM Subject: Re: Bridges ORE part 1 at the subconscious i still remember at postqualification training time that canine has a long root it needs two teeth as a abutment for replacement in canti ...though i very welcome a third op From: Kanika Kohli <kanika_sahil@...>" " < > Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012, 2:55Subject: Re: Bridges ORE part 1 I Agree with first but for second cantilever has pontic connected to retainer at one end only.so it has to be premolars but nt sure... From: Areej Abbas <areej.aldura@...>" " < > Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012 2:49 AMSubject: Re: Bridges ORE part 1 THE ANSWER TO ONE IN MY OPI IS A one of the indications for A is a favourable occlusion plus it causes tipping movement to the abutment and rotation as well ,not to mention the preparation for such unideal labial segment which will complicate the whole procedure so land is considered as a less invasive short term treatment until an proper orth treatment take place .. for 2 is b that is to avoid the preparation for a narrow and small tooth as the lateral and it is completely unnecessary as long as there are two sound pre on the same side do you agree with me guys From: sualehuddinkhan <drsualehkhan@...> Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2012, 22:33Subject: Bridges ORE part 1 Hi Guyz! Can you please help me on these....Question 1: In a class II.2 malocclusion, which bridge design would be contraindicated for a missing lateral upper incisor?A.Cantilever bridgeB.land bridgeQuestion 2: Which is the best cantilever bridge design for missing maxillary canine? Abutment onA.Both premolarsB.Lateral and central incisorC.Lateral incisorD.First premolarI would appreciate if you guyz can explain as well.Kind RegardsSualeh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 MAXILLARY CANINE REPLACEMENT IS A COMPLEX ONE. BECAUSE CANINE LIES OUTSIDE THE INTER-ABUTMENT AXIS.SO THE PROSPECTIVE ABUTMENTS ARE LAT .INC AND THE FIRST PREMOLAR.THE IDEAL ONE IS TO INCLUDE THE CENTRAL INCISOR ALSO TO GET THE ABUTMENT PONTIC ROOT RATIO OF 2.3.RESTORE OCCLUSION IN GROUP FUNCTION.USE OF TWO PREMOLARS AND THE LAT.INC.IS NOT DESIRABLE,COZ IT PLACES TOO HEAVY A BURDEN ON THE SMALLER SINGLE ABUTMENT.NOW THE CANTILEVER HAS GOT ABUTMENT IN ONE END ONLY.SINCE THE CENTRALS ROOT CONFIGARATION ARE NOT FOR CANTILEVER FPDs THEN WE HAVE TO CHOOSE THE PREMOLARS(BOTH).BUT IN PRACTICAL CANTILEVERS NOT FOR CANINES. CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG.REF:SHILLINGBURG.Thanks & Regards,Padma From: Sajithakumari Sivaprem <ssajithakumari@...> " " < > Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012, 9:46 Subject: Re: Bridges ORE part 1 i feel u both are telling abt the same option...premolars.......tht seem to b rt considering aesthetics...too.. From: Areej Abbas <areej.aldura@...> " " < > Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012 3:58 AM Subject: Re: Bridges ORE part 1 at the subconscious i still remember at postqualification training time that canine has a long root it needs two teeth as a abutment for replacement in canti ...though i very welcome a third op From: Kanika Kohli <kanika_sahil@...>" " < > Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012, 2:55Subject: Re: Bridges ORE part 1 I Agree with first but for second cantilever has pontic connected to retainer at one end only.so it has to be premolars but nt sure... From: Areej Abbas <areej.aldura@...>" " < > Sent: Monday, 27 February 2012 2:49 AMSubject: Re: Bridges ORE part 1 THE ANSWER TO ONE IN MY OPI IS A one of the indications for A is a favourable occlusion plus it causes tipping movement to the abutment and rotation as well ,not to mention the preparation for such unideal labial segment which will complicate the whole procedure so land is considered as a less invasive short term treatment until an proper orth treatment take place .. for 2 is b that is to avoid the preparation for a narrow and small tooth as the lateral and it is completely unnecessary as long as there are two sound pre on the same side do you agree with me guys From: sualehuddinkhan <drsualehkhan@...> Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2012, 22:33Subject: Bridges ORE part 1 Hi Guyz! Can you please help me on these....Question 1: In a class II.2 malocclusion, which bridge design would be contraindicated for a missing lateral upper incisor?A.Cantilever bridgeB.land bridgeQuestion 2: Which is the best cantilever bridge design for missing maxillary canine? Abutment onA.Both premolarsB.Lateral and central incisorC.Lateral incisorD.First premolarI would appreciate if you guyz can explain as well.Kind RegardsSualeh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2012 Report Share Posted February 27, 2012 Dear allMy name is Nick , I run coreskills online and equivalence online. I practice in the UK and lecture to many dentists. I am part of a team that includes past examiners that are lecturing on how to pass UK exams –ORE, MJDF and also clinical governance and the system in the UK. We are visiting Egypt next month.We could help you with many of the issues that are raised on the site and provide a lot of support to pass the exams you need. There are usually 3-4 of us and we lecture for 3 days and on long haul stay an extra two nights to see the sights. Our costs are simply business flights and good accommodation. If your group is interested please get in touchRgdsNick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.