Re: Partial pulpotomy Cvek

[Guest guest]

i think we should go for GIC for its self adhesive property....sajitha From: Miral <miral_hasan@...> " " < > Sent: Sunday, 4 March 2012 11:48 AM Subject: Partial pulpotomy Cvek

Dear all,

I know we should place GI then final restoration following partial pulpotomy,but if we have a choice in an MCQ between ca hydroxide +GI OR ca hydroxide +composite.

What should be our choice.

Thanks

Miral

Sent from my iPad

[Guest guest]

So is it better leakage wise?Sent from my iPadOn 4 Mar 2012, at 12:09, Sajithakumari Sivaprem <ssajithakumari@...> wrote:

i think we should go for GIC for its self adhesive property....sajitha From: Miral <miral_hasan@...> " " < > Sent: Sunday, 4 March 2012 11:48 AM Subject: Partial pulpotomy Cvek

Dear all,

I know we should place GI then final restoration following partial pulpotomy,but if we have a choice in an MCQ between ca hydroxide +GI OR ca hydroxide +composite.

What should be our choice.

Thanks

Miral

Sent from my iPad

[Guest guest]

I am not sure,coz in pink book it is said GI then restore crown..p101?Sent from my iPadOn 4 Mar 2012, at 12:58, "Mokaamr@..." <mokaamr@...> wrote:

So is it better leakage wise?Sent from my iPadOn 4 Mar 2012, at 12:09, Sajithakumari Sivaprem <ssajithakumari@...> wrote:

i think we should go for GIC for its self adhesive property....sajitha From: Miral <miral_hasan@...> " " < > Sent: Sunday, 4 March 2012 11:48 AM Subject: Partial pulpotomy Cvek

Dear all,

I know we should place GI then final restoration following partial pulpotomy,but if we have a choice in an MCQ between ca hydroxide +GI OR ca hydroxide +composite.

What should be our choice.

Thanks

Miral

Sent from my iPad

[Guest guest]

Hi Miral, i think it will depend on the clinical situation....if in anteriors...composite is preferred in terms of aesthetics....if the exposure is small u can give GIC if exposure is large and in load bearing situation in posterior teeth....composite.....if u decide to give a crown at a later time then sealing can be done with GI... what do u think?sajitha From: Miral <miral_hasan@...> " " < > Sent: Sunday, 4 March 2012 1:01 PM Subject: Re: Partial pulpotomy Cvek

I am not sure,coz in pink book it is said GI then restore crown..p101?Sent from my iPadOn 4 Mar 2012, at 12:58, "Mokaamr@..." <mokaamr@...> wrote:

So is it better leakage wise?Sent from my iPadOn 4 Mar 2012, at 12:09, Sajithakumari Sivaprem <ssajithakumari@...> wrote:

i think we should go for GIC for its self adhesive property....sajitha From: Miral <miral_hasan@...> " " < > Sent: Sunday, 4 March 2012 11:48 AM Subject: Partial pulpotomy Cvek

Dear all,

I know we should place GI then final restoration following partial pulpotomy,but if we have a choice in an MCQ between ca hydroxide +GI OR ca hydroxide +composite.

What should be our choice.

Thanks

Miral

Sent from my iPad

[Guest guest]

I agree with you Sajitha at this answer.Sincerely, Mujtaba From: Sajithakumari Sivaprem <ssajithakumari@...> " " < > Sent: Sunday, March 4, 2012 7:41 PM Subject: Re: Partial pulpotomy Cvek

Hi Miral, i think it will depend on the clinical situation....if in anteriors...composite is preferred in terms of aesthetics....if the exposure is small u can give GIC if exposure is large and in load bearing situation in posterior teeth....composite.....if u decide to give a crown at a later time then sealing can be done with GI... what do u think?sajitha From: Miral <miral_hasan@...> " " < > Sent: Sunday, 4 March 2012 1:01 PM Subject: Re: Partial pulpotomy Cvek

I am not sure,coz in pink book it is said GI then restore crown..p101?Sent from my iPadOn 4 Mar 2012, at 12:58, "Mokaamr@..." <mokaamr@...> wrote:

So is it better leakage wise?Sent from my iPadOn 4 Mar 2012, at 12:09, Sajithakumari Sivaprem <ssajithakumari@...> wrote:

i think we should go for GIC for its self adhesive property....sajitha From: Miral <miral_hasan@...> " " < > Sent: Sunday, 4 March 2012 11:48 AM Subject: Partial pulpotomy Cvek

Dear all,

I know we should place GI then final restoration following partial pulpotomy,but if we have a choice in an MCQ between ca hydroxide +GI OR ca hydroxide +composite.

What should be our choice.

Thanks

Miral

Sent from my iPad

[Guest guest]

Calcium hydroxide and composite. And als

o I think we place caoh in pulpotomy

[Guest guest]

Thanks a lot for all your answers!Sent from my iPadOn 4 Mar 2012, at 17:54, Mujtaba Choudhry <mujtabachoudhry@...> wrote:

I agree with you Sajitha at this answer.Sincerely, Mujtaba From: Sajithakumari Sivaprem <ssajithakumari@...> " " < > Sent: Sunday, March 4, 2012 7:41 PM Subject: Re: Partial pulpotomy Cvek

Hi Miral, i think it will depend on the clinical situation....if in anteriors...composite is preferred in terms of aesthetics....if the exposure is small u can give GIC if exposure is large and in load bearing situation in posterior teeth....composite.....if u decide to give a crown at a later time then sealing can be done with GI... what do u think?sajitha From: Miral <miral_hasan@...> " " < > Sent: Sunday, 4 March 2012 1:01 PM Subject: Re: Partial pulpotomy Cvek

I am not sure,coz in pink book it is said GI then restore crown..p101?Sent from my iPadOn 4 Mar 2012, at 12:58, "Mokaamr@..." <mokaamr@...> wrote:

So is it better leakage wise?Sent from my iPadOn 4 Mar 2012, at 12:09, Sajithakumari Sivaprem <ssajithakumari@...> wrote:

i think we should go for GIC for its self adhesive property....sajitha From: Miral <miral_hasan@...> " " < > Sent: Sunday, 4 March 2012 11:48 AM Subject: Partial pulpotomy Cvek

Dear all,

I know we should place GI then final restoration following partial pulpotomy,but if we have a choice in an MCQ between ca hydroxide +GI OR ca hydroxide +composite.

What should be our choice.

Thanks

Miral

Sent from my iPad