Guest guest Posted July 13, 2012 Report Share Posted July 13, 2012 Marking scheduleCase Name: Fiona Cand No: Station:Case Topic: Discussion of possible treatment options Examiner:Information GatheringCompetent Recognises concern about aesthetics and function Appreciates relevance of the wedding in the near future and the need to move things along swiftly Also appreciates possible pressure from parentsNot competent Fails to gain appropriate information Fails to appreciate influence of the forthcoming weddingGradeDentist-patient interactionCompetent Shows appropriate concern and empathyNot competent Fails to develop adequate rapport.GradeConveying informationCompetent Clear explanation of various options Gives accurate information re what each procedure involves and relative costs (including time)Not competent Fails to discuss all possible options Vague Over technical explanation with lots of jargon Fails to acknowledge time constraints imposed by weddingGradeClinical issuesCompetent Explains need for possible referral to „specialist‟ for implant treatment Suggests that further investigations to assess bone volume is likelyNot competent Ignores possible need for additional „specialist‟ inputGradePass/Fail Kind regardsAlenaOzieva From: Divya <dr.divya_gandhi@...> To: " " < > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:18 PM Subject: Re: OSCE Consider an implant ....a fixed partial denture..rpd..but no resin bonded..it would fail..Sent from my iPhoneOn 11 Jul 2012, at 10:36, Nadile Albe <albenadile@...> wrote: Thank you but if we have 21 and 22 missing will we consider resin bonded bridge? From: Mr Happy Tooth <mr.happytooth@...> " " < > Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2012, 10:33 Subject: Re: OSCE The ideal option for this patient is definately an implant ...Other available ''more permanent'' option include:-Minimal preparation bridge-Cantilever bridge-Conventional bridge From: Alena Ozieva <alenaozieva@...> To: " " < > Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2012, 9:17 Subject: OSCE Candidate informationCase Topic: Discussion of possible treatment optionsNameFiona Age25 yearsGenderFemaleOccupationSolicitorRelevant social historyNon-smoker/never smokedDrinks 1 to 2 glasses of wine several evenings a weekRelevant medical historyFit and wellInformation about scenario Tooth 21 traumatised at the age of 7 years; restored with a series of composite restorations, then a post crown at age 16 years. 21 root fractured approximately 1 year ago and root extracted 9 months ago. Currently wearing a tissue borne acrylic P/- to replace this tooth. Otherwise intact dentition, minimally restored. Excellent oral hygiene.At this stationThe patient wants to discuss with you the available options to replace the missing incisor with something more permanent. Kind regardsAlenaOzieva Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2012 Report Share Posted July 13, 2012 thanks alena im sure this would be useful for ore part 2 candidates..u know what to stress on From: Alena Ozieva <alenaozieva@...> " " < > Sent: Friday, 13 July 2012 12:33 PM Subject: Re: OSCE-marking sheet Marking scheduleCase Name: Fiona Cand No: Station:Case Topic: Discussion of possible treatment options Examiner:Information GatheringCompetent Recognises concern about aesthetics and function Appreciates relevance of the wedding in the near future and the need to move things along swiftly Also appreciates possible pressure from parentsNot competent Fails to gain appropriate information Fails to appreciate influence of the forthcoming weddingGradeDentist-patient interactionCompetent Shows appropriate concern and empathyNot competent Fails to develop adequate rapport.GradeConveying informationCompetent Clear explanation of various options Gives accurate information re what each procedure involves and relative costs (including time)Not competent Fails to discuss all possible options Vague Over technical explanation with lots of jargon Fails to acknowledge time constraints imposed by weddingGradeClinical issuesCompetent Explains need for possible referral to „specialist‟ for implant treatment Suggests that further investigations to assess bone volume is likelyNot competent Ignores possible need for additional „specialist‟ inputGradePass/Fail Kind regardsAlenaOzieva From: Divya <dr.divya_gandhi@...> To: " " < > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:18 PM Subject: Re: OSCE Consider an implant ....a fixed partial denture..rpd..but no resin bonded..it would fail..Sent from my iPhoneOn 11 Jul 2012, at 10:36, Nadile Albe <albenadile@...> wrote: Thank you but if we have 21 and 22 missing will we consider resin bonded bridge? From: Mr Happy Tooth <mr.happytooth@...> " " < > Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2012, 10:33 Subject: Re: OSCE The ideal option for this patient is definately an implant ...Other available ''more permanent'' option include:-Minimal preparation bridge-Cantilever bridge-Conventional bridge From: Alena Ozieva <alenaozieva@...> To: " " < > Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2012, 9:17 Subject: OSCE Candidate informationCase Topic: Discussion of possible treatment optionsNameFiona Age25 yearsGenderFemaleOccupationSolicitorRelevant social historyNon-smoker/never smokedDrinks 1 to 2 glasses of wine several evenings a weekRelevant medical historyFit and wellInformation about scenario Tooth 21 traumatised at the age of 7 years; restored with a series of composite restorations, then a post crown at age 16 years. 21 root fractured approximately 1 year ago and root extracted 9 months ago. Currently wearing a tissue borne acrylic P/- to replace this tooth. Otherwise intact dentition, minimally restored. Excellent oral hygiene.At this stationThe patient wants to discuss with you the available options to replace the missing incisor with something more permanent. Kind regardsAlenaOzieva Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2012 Report Share Posted July 13, 2012 thanks Alena. From: Shazia Rehman <shazii_00@...> " " < > Sent: Friday, 13 July 2012, 12:45 Subject: Re: OSCE-marking sheet thanks alena im sure this would be useful for ore part 2 candidates..u know what to stress on From: Alena Ozieva <alenaozieva@...> " " < > Sent: Friday, 13 July 2012 12:33 PM Subject: Re: OSCE-marking sheet Marking scheduleCase Name: Fiona Cand No: Station:Case Topic: Discussion of possible treatment options Examiner:Information GatheringCompetent Recognises concern about aesthetics and function Appreciates relevance of the wedding in the near future and the need to move things along swiftly Also appreciates possible pressure from parentsNot competent Fails to gain appropriate information Fails to appreciate influence of the forthcoming weddingGradeDentist-patient interactionCompetent Shows appropriate concern and empathyNot competent Fails to develop adequate rapport.GradeConveying informationCompetent Clear explanation of various options Gives accurate information re what each procedure involves and relative costs (including time)Not competent Fails to discuss all possible options Vague Over technical explanation with lots of jargon Fails to acknowledge time constraints imposed by weddingGradeClinical issuesCompetent Explains need for possible referral to „specialist‟ for implant treatment Suggests that further investigations to assess bone volume is likelyNot competent Ignores possible need for additional „specialist‟ inputGradePass/Fail Kind regardsAlenaOzieva From: Divya <dr.divya_gandhi@...> To: " " < > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:18 PM Subject: Re: OSCE Consider an implant ....a fixed partial denture..rpd..but no resin bonded..it would fail..Sent from my iPhoneOn 11 Jul 2012, at 10:36, Nadile Albe <albenadile@...> wrote: Thank you but if we have 21 and 22 missing will we consider resin bonded bridge? From: Mr Happy Tooth <mr.happytooth@...> " " < > Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2012, 10:33 Subject: Re: OSCE The ideal option for this patient is definately an implant ...Other available ''more permanent'' option include:-Minimal preparation bridge-Cantilever bridge-Conventional bridge From: Alena Ozieva <alenaozieva@...> To: " " < > Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2012, 9:17 Subject: OSCE Candidate informationCase Topic: Discussion of possible treatment optionsNameFiona Age25 yearsGenderFemaleOccupationSolicitorRelevant social historyNon-smoker/never smokedDrinks 1 to 2 glasses of wine several evenings a weekRelevant medical historyFit and wellInformation about scenario Tooth 21 traumatised at the age of 7 years; restored with a series of composite restorations, then a post crown at age 16 years. 21 root fractured approximately 1 year ago and root extracted 9 months ago. Currently wearing a tissue borne acrylic P/- to replace this tooth. Otherwise intact dentition, minimally restored. Excellent oral hygiene.At this stationThe patient wants to discuss with you the available options to replace the missing incisor with something more permanent. Kind regardsAlenaOzieva Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2012 Report Share Posted July 13, 2012 thank you very much very informative Alena SincerelyLyudmyla From: Shazia Rehman <shazii_00@...> " " < > Sent: Friday, 13 July 2012, 12:45 Subject: Re: OSCE-marking sheet thanks alena im sure this would be useful for ore part 2 candidates..u know what to stress on From: Alena Ozieva <alenaozieva@...> " " < > Sent: Friday, 13 July 2012 12:33 PM Subject: Re: OSCE-marking sheet Marking scheduleCase Name: Fiona Cand No: Station:Case Topic: Discussion of possible treatment options Examiner:Information GatheringCompetent Recognises concern about aesthetics and function Appreciates relevance of the wedding in the near future and the need to move things along swiftly Also appreciates possible pressure from parentsNot competent Fails to gain appropriate information Fails to appreciate influence of the forthcoming weddingGradeDentist-patient interactionCompetent Shows appropriate concern and empathyNot competent Fails to develop adequate rapport.GradeConveying informationCompetent Clear explanation of various options Gives accurate information re what each procedure involves and relative costs (including time)Not competent Fails to discuss all possible options Vague Over technical explanation with lots of jargon Fails to acknowledge time constraints imposed by weddingGradeClinical issuesCompetent Explains need for possible referral to „specialist‟ for implant treatment Suggests that further investigations to assess bone volume is likelyNot competent Ignores possible need for additional „specialist‟ inputGradePass/Fail Kind regardsAlenaOzieva From: Divya <dr.divya_gandhi@...> To: " " < > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:18 PM Subject: Re: OSCE Consider an implant ....a fixed partial denture..rpd..but no resin bonded..it would fail..Sent from my iPhoneOn 11 Jul 2012, at 10:36, Nadile Albe <albenadile@...> wrote: Thank you but if we have 21 and 22 missing will we consider resin bonded bridge? From: Mr Happy Tooth <mr.happytooth@...> " " < > Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2012, 10:33 Subject: Re: OSCE The ideal option for this patient is definately an implant ...Other available ''more permanent'' option include:-Minimal preparation bridge-Cantilever bridge-Conventional bridge From: Alena Ozieva <alenaozieva@...> To: " " < > Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2012, 9:17 Subject: OSCE Candidate informationCase Topic: Discussion of possible treatment optionsNameFiona Age25 yearsGenderFemaleOccupationSolicitorRelevant social historyNon-smoker/never smokedDrinks 1 to 2 glasses of wine several evenings a weekRelevant medical historyFit and wellInformation about scenario Tooth 21 traumatised at the age of 7 years; restored with a series of composite restorations, then a post crown at age 16 years. 21 root fractured approximately 1 year ago and root extracted 9 months ago. Currently wearing a tissue borne acrylic P/- to replace this tooth. Otherwise intact dentition, minimally restored. Excellent oral hygiene.At this stationThe patient wants to discuss with you the available options to replace the missing incisor with something more permanent. Kind regardsAlenaOzieva Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 13, 2012 Report Share Posted July 13, 2012 Thank you. All the best!--- Em sex, 13/7/12, Lyudmyla Huhley <huhley2006@...> escreveu: De: Lyudmyla Huhley <huhley2006@...>Assunto: Re: OSCE-marking sheetPara: " " < >Data: Sexta-feira, 13 de Julho de 2012, 8:54 thank you very much very informative Alena SincerelyLyudmyla From: Shazia Rehman <shazii_00@...>" " < > Sent: Friday, 13 July 2012, 12:45Subject: Re: OSCE-marking sheet thanks alena im sure this would be useful for ore part 2 candidates..u know what to stress on From: Alena Ozieva <alenaozieva@...>" " < > Sent: Friday, 13 July 2012 12:33 PMSubject: Re: OSCE-marking sheet Marking scheduleCase Name: Fiona Cand No: Station:Case Topic: Discussion of possible treatment options Examiner:Information GatheringCompetent Recognises concern about aesthetics and function Appreciates relevance of the wedding in the near future and the need to move things along swiftly Also appreciates possible pressure from parentsNot competent Fails to gain appropriate information Fails to appreciate influence of the forthcoming weddingGradeDentist-patient interactionCompetent Shows appropriate concern and empathyNot competent Fails to develop adequate rapport.GradeConveying informationCompetent Clear explanation of various options Gives accurate information re what each procedure involves and relative costs (including time)Not competent Fails to discuss all possible options Vague Over technical explanation with lots of jargon Fails to acknowledge time constraints imposed by weddingGradeClinical issuesCompetent Explains need for possible referral to „specialist‟ for implant treatment Suggests that further investigations to assess bone volume is likelyNot competent Ignores possible need for additional „specialist‟ inputGradePass/Fail Kind regardsAlenaOzieva From: Divya <dr.divya_gandhi@...>" " < > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:18 PMSubject: Re: OSCE Consider an implant ....a fixed partial denture..rpd..but no resin bonded..it would fail..Sent from my iPhone On 11 Jul 2012, at 10:36, Nadile Albe <albenadile@...> wrote: Thank you but if we have 21 and 22 missing will we consider resin bonded bridge? From: Mr Happy Tooth <mr.happytooth@...>" " < > Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2012, 10:33Subject: Re: OSCE The ideal option for this patient is definately an implant ... Other available ''more permanent'' option include: -Minimal preparation bridge -Cantilever bridge -Conventional bridge From: Alena Ozieva <alenaozieva@...>" " < > Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2012, 9:17Subject: OSCE Candidate informationCase Topic: Discussion of possible treatment optionsNameFiona Age25 yearsGenderFemaleOccupationSolicitorRelevant social historyNon-smoker/never smokedDrinks 1 to 2 glasses of wine several evenings a weekRelevant medical historyFit and wellInformation about scenario Tooth 21 traumatised at the age of 7 years; restored with a series of composite restorations, then a post crown at age 16 years. 21 root fractured approximately 1 year ago and root extracted 9 months ago. Currently wearing a tissue borne acrylic P/- to replace this tooth. Otherwise intact dentition, minimally restored. Excellent oral hygiene ..At this stationThe patient wants to discuss with you the available options to replace the missing incisor with something more permanent. Kind regardsAlenaOzieva Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2012 Report Share Posted July 14, 2012 thanx a lot Alena:) From: Alena Ozieva <alenaozieva@...>" " < > Sent: Friday, 13 July 2012, 12:33Subject: Re: OSCE-marking sheet Marking scheduleCase Name: Fiona Cand No: Station:Case Topic: Discussion of possible treatment options Examiner:Information GatheringCompetent Recognises concern about aesthetics and function Appreciates relevance of the wedding in the near future and the need to move things along swiftly Also appreciates possible pressure from parentsNot competent Fails to gain appropriate information Fails to appreciate influence of the forthcoming weddingGradeDentist-patient interactionCompetent Shows appropriate concern and empathyNot competent Fails to develop adequate rapport.GradeConveying informationCompetent Clear explanation of various options Gives accurate information re what each procedure involves and relative costs (including time)Not competent Fails to discuss all possible options Vague Over technical explanation with lots of jargon Fails to acknowledge time constraints imposed by weddingGradeClinical issuesCompetent Explains need for possible referral to „specialist‟ for implant treatment Suggests that further investigations to assess bone volume is likelyNot competent Ignores possible need for additional „specialist‟ inputGradePass/Fail Kind regardsAlenaOzieva From: Divya <dr.divya_gandhi@...>" " < > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:18 PMSubject: Re: OSCE Consider an implant ....a fixed partial denture..rpd..but no resin bonded..it would fail..Sent from my iPhone On 11 Jul 2012, at 10:36, Nadile Albe <albenadile@...> wrote: Thank you but if we have 21 and 22 missing will we consider resin bonded bridge? From: Mr Happy Tooth <mr.happytooth@...>" " < > Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2012, 10:33Subject: Re: OSCE The ideal option for this patient is definately an implant ... Other available ''more permanent'' option include: -Minimal preparation bridge -Cantilever bridge -Conventional bridge From: Alena Ozieva <alenaozieva@...>" " < > Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2012, 9:17Subject: OSCE Candidate informationCase Topic: Discussion of possible treatment optionsNameFiona Age25 yearsGenderFemaleOccupationSolicitorRelevant social historyNon-smoker/never smokedDrinks 1 to 2 glasses of wine several evenings a weekRelevant medical historyFit and wellInformation about scenario Tooth 21 traumatised at the age of 7 years; restored with a series of composite restorations, then a post crown at age 16 years. 21 root fractured approximately 1 year ago and root extracted 9 months ago. Currently wearing a tissue borne acrylic P/- to replace this tooth. Otherwise intact dentition, minimally restored. Excellent oral hygiene ..At this stationThe patient wants to discuss with you the available options to replace the missing incisor with something more permanent. Kind regardsAlenaOzieva Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2012 Report Share Posted July 15, 2012 Hi Alena, Thanks for the question & marking sheet,but I can't seem to find anything in the question itself that suggests the patient is planning to get married in the near future,so how are we supposed to know & incorporate it into the answer?Or is there something I missed out?Kindly help.Thank you. Regards, Fadeke. From: Alena Ozieva <alenaozieva@...>; To: < >; Subject: Re: OSCE-marking sheet Sent: Fri, Jul 13, 2012 11:33:21 AM Marking scheduleCase Name: Fiona Cand No: Station:Case Topic: Discussion of possible treatment options Examiner:Information GatheringCompetent Recognises concern about aesthetics and function Appreciates relevance of the wedding in the near future and the need to move things along swiftly Also appreciates possible pressure from parentsNot competent Fails to gain appropriate information Fails to appreciate influence of the forthcoming weddingGradeDentist-patient interactionCompetent Shows appropriate concern and empathyNot competent Fails to develop adequate rapport.GradeConveying informationCompetent Clear explanation of various options Gives accurate information re what each procedure involves and relative costs (including time)Not competent Fails to discuss all possible options Vague Over technical explanation with lots of jargon Fails to acknowledge time constraints imposed by weddingGradeClinical issuesCompetent Explains need for possible referral to „specialist‟ for implant treatment Suggests that further investigations to assess bone volume is likelyNot competent Ignores possible need for additional „specialist‟ inputGradePass/Fail Kind regardsAlenaOzieva From: Divya <dr.divya_gandhi@...> To: " " < > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:18 PM Subject: Re: OSCE Consider an implant ....a fixed partial denture..rpd..but no resin bonded..it would fail..Sent from my iPhoneOn 11 Jul 2012, at 10:36, Nadile Albe <albenadile@...> wrote: Thank you but if we have 21 and 22 missing will we consider resin bonded bridge? From: Mr Happy Tooth <mr.happytooth@...> " " < > Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2012, 10:33 Subject: Re: OSCE The ideal option for this patient is definately an implant ...Other available ''more permanent'' option include:-Minimal preparation bridge-Cantilever bridge-Conventional bridge From: Alena Ozieva <alenaozieva@...> To: " " < > Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2012, 9:17 Subject: OSCE Candidate informationCase Topic: Discussion of possible treatment optionsNameFiona Age25 yearsGenderFemaleOccupationSolicitorRelevant social historyNon-smoker/never smokedDrinks 1 to 2 glasses of wine several evenings a weekRelevant medical historyFit and wellInformation about scenario Tooth 21 traumatised at the age of 7 years; restored with a series of composite restorations, then a post crown at age 16 years. 21 root fractured approximately 1 year ago and root extracted 9 months ago. Currently wearing a tissue borne acrylic P/- to replace this tooth. Otherwise intact dentition, minimally restored. Excellent oral hygiene.At this stationThe patient wants to discuss with you the available options to replace the missing incisor with something more permanent. Kind regardsAlenaOzieva Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.