Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 Dear Mallika and the FORUM, Buladi's reply of " you and your husband immediately go and get yourself tested " sends out a pragmatic message, the need of the hour! Hoardings are a tool of limited communication we must accept, and therefore should only send lucid messages for immediate and necessary action by the reader. In my opinion, care and support should supersede issues of `morality' in the HIV/AIDS context given the life threatening consequences of the epidemic. However, what can be done is by having an asterix at the bottom corner of the hoarding saying that the advice given by Buladi above is the immediate step that one must take and for more detailed advice and help a central counselling centre's number be contacted. Hope the above sounds rational. Best, Reshmi Sarkar e-MAIL: <aidslaw2@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 27, 2005 Report Share Posted May 27, 2005 Hello Mallika: As regards the Buladi campaign. The issues you have raised are very important and they should be raised. But I am thinking when you are giving messages about HIV/AIDS to women-- preventing or treating HIV/AIDS should take the center place. I think that message should not get lost among other issues. Because if she becomes infected from her husband-- dealing with it would take the center place in her life. If she finds herself to be negative-- then she can deal with other issues-- may leave her husband or go for counselling etc and most of all avoid sexual contact. The testing center should tell her how dangerous it would be for her to have sex with an adulterous man. But if she finds her self to be positive-- dealing with an adulterous husband would be the least of her concern-- then she will have her own treatment and her children to think about. But as far as she is concerned -- her first order of business would be to go for testing-- with or without her husband. Thanks. Sathi Dasgupta. E-mail: <sathi_dasgupta@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2005 Report Share Posted May 30, 2005 Dear Mallika, This is in response to Buladii's advice to the housewife in the ad.The questions raised by you are quite right.The indian minds are so tuned to the male domination that they don't even realise that some thing wrong has been said or mentioned. How else do such campaigns see the light of the day? Poor Buladi is the mouthpiece of some male chuvanist or otherwise a(an unintended but foolish) terrible mistake of projecting women in worst form of social injustice. The campaign clearly takes the side of the husband who has a right to display his 'manly' power,control and aggression that leads to the violation of the body and mind of his wife, her self-respect and dignity. It is depressing, sad and very dishearteting that we the people of India have remianed so insensitive. The campaign makes one realise that we have a long way to go before we improve. The reason is we don't even realise that we have made a mistake. Where is the question of rectfying it then? Dr.Divya E-mail: <d_mithel@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2005 Report Share Posted May 31, 2005 Dear FORUM, I don't think communication campaigns are either piloted or screened for their gender or sexuality- related messages. Even in the past, IEC campaigns have maligned vulnerable groups leading to further stigmatization/ discrimination against them and misinformation about HIV itself. A recent HIV- related campaign in UP which used Bollywood movie titles as slogans was pulled off after several positive people's networks protested against them. What this perhaps indiactes is the lack of understanding of the various dimensions of HIV and the complexity involved in communicating a medical, behavioral as well as socio- cultural message. We perhaps are still operatng in the family planning IEC mode of trying to hammer in some messages and therefore fail to connect to people's lived realities. While IEC campaigns by themselves cannot effect social or behavioral change, they do help to open up discussions around an issue and therefore it becomes imperative that they be caerfully designed to ensure not just popularity but also accuracy and sensitivity to different groups of people and keeping them value- free and non- judgemental. Akhila Panchamukhi e-MAIL: <akhila_punch@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2005 Report Share Posted June 3, 2005 Dear FORUM, An engaging discussion on this campaign. While I do confess that I do not know the details of this campaign, I have indeed seen some of the hoardings around Kolkata. While people make have critical comments to make about this (and other) mass media campaigns, let us first and foremost remember to congratulate the implementers of the campaign. The WBSACS and its Project Director Mr. Suresh Kumar should be congratulated for communicating HIV/AIDS prevention messages in a creative manner that demands attention and generates discussion and a call to action. All too often public service announcements are dull are boring. This one certainly is not! A wise man said 'I don't know the secret to success, but the secret to failure is trying to please everyone.' So to the team at WBSACS, my personal hurrah for your efforts. I am sure you will take into account relevant comments and improve the campaign the next time around. But I hope it should not deter you from launching the next phase. Regards, Sanjay Sanjay Chaganti Program Director PSI India www.psiopl.org e-MAIL: <schaganti@...> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.