Guest guest Posted December 6, 2000 Report Share Posted December 6, 2000 "Most of those who would limit the profession to adjustment only do so to remind us that we do not treat the body with herbs or ultrasound. If we focused on real issues of life or death no one would deny us the use of herbs, acupuncture, or whatever to bring comfort and sustenance to our patients. But to substitute treatment for adjustment, that is the problem." Willard, I don't know anyone who wishes to limit chiropractic to adjustment only. The definition of chiropractic, as proposed by those originally defining it, deals with the detection and correction of the subluxation so that "innate" intelligence you mentioned can express itself, optimally. Current science outside the chiropractic profession is leading in this direction. It seems that we, at least certain factions of chiropractic, are predominant in steering away from it. All other modalities used in our practices are geared toward the alleviation of symptoms and alterations in lifestyle in order to avoid creating an environment that creates subluxations. If you call yourself a chiropractor, then this is your primary job. If one's actions are not true to the philosophical construct adhered to, you create contradictions. This is the definition of ethics, actions based upon your code of values! R. Stearns, D.C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.