Guest guest Posted May 2, 2001 Report Share Posted May 2, 2001 [nbofe] PA members take note > On a related matter, the past issue of the PT Magazine included a list > of the > most critical issues facing the PT profession. Included were the > following: > 1)Chiropractors' attempts to exclude PTs from being reimbursed for > manipulation; and 2) Physicians status under Medicare for PTs. > One other related matter, the APTA Director of Government Relations > wrote to > the legislators in Pennsylvania arguing that the current Pennsylvania > statute > that permits physical therapists to do mobilization also permits them to > perform manipulation. She tries to argue this flawed interpretation by > pointing out the CPT codes include a provision for reimbursing > manipulation > done by physical therapists and made a number of other related claims. I > sent > a letter to our delegate that he can share with others, refuting this > position and stating that the AMA CPT codes are fully dependant on the > state > authority of the individual practitioner to provide the service > identified by > the code, and not the other way around. I mention the comments in the > PT > Magazine and the recent correspondence in Pennsylvania to note that the > PTs > are increasing their aggressiveness relative to manipulation. For them > to > argue that mobilization is manipulation says something about their > attitude > in this regard, and should cause a number of states real concerns if > they are > successful. > -- > <{©¿©}> > > Warren Jahn DC MPS FACO DACBSP > 770-740-1999 770-619-3203 fax > Chiropractic Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation Center > Roswell GA 30076 > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.