Guest guest Posted September 12, 2001 Report Share Posted September 12, 2001 Lawmakers Mull Regulating Dietary Supplements September 10, 2001 3:46 pm EST By Adam Entous WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The chairman of a Senate panel said Monday he may seek tighter regulation of the $27 billion dietary supplements industry, citing alleged marketing abuses by one of the largest herbal-remedy companies and its owner, who was pardoned by former President Bill Clinton. Glenn Braswell, who was pardoned in January for a 1983 mail fraud conviction stemming from his sale of a product that he falsely claimed cured baldness, invoked his Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination and refused to answer the questions of Sen. Breaux, chairman of the Special Committee on Aging. After the hearing, Breaux, a Louisiana Democrat, said legislative action may be needed to protect seniors, many of whom use anti-aging products and other dietary supplements as an alternative to traditional treatments or to save money on expensive prescription drugs. " We're going to explore it, " Breaux told Reuters, referring to legislation that would give federal regulators new tools to ensure the safety of supplements and keep companies from making false claims about their products. An estimated 60 percent of Americans take some form of supplement with no apparent health problems. But lawmakers and health experts say some anti-aging products can pose health risks, particularly to the elderly, and unlike new prescription and over-the-counter drugs, U.S. law does not require them to undergo premarket approval for safety and efficacy. The General Accounting Office, which conducts investigations for lawmakers, warned the Senate committee that seniors may be particularly at risk of " physical harm from the use of anti-aging alternative medicine products. " Breaux said he was " disturbed " by the GAO's findings. The Senate hearing focused largely on the marketing practices and advertising claims of Braswell and his GB Data Systems Inc., the holding company for at least 10 businesses selling a wide range of dietary supplements. The former chief financial officer of GB Data, O'Neil, told the committee that Braswell's products -- which claim to treat everything from constipation to anxiety -- " could not possibly deliver what is promised in the advertising. " The process used to recruit customers, O'Neil added, was " flawed and laden with lies and deception. " The Senate panel had subpoenaed Braswell, who allegedly paid Clinton's brother-in-law to press for his pardon, to testify along with Ron Tepper, editor of the Journal of Longevity. Committee aides allege that the journal is used as a " marketing and advertising tool " for Braswell's products. Both were sworn in by Breaux, but they refused to answer questions. Committee aides said they were urged by counsel to invoke their Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination in light of an ongoing investigation by federal prosecutors and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). " These are clearly cases of 21st century snake oil salesmen, " Breaux said. " They sell slick-looking advertisements that look like medical journals but take advantage of the elderly by putting both their health and their finances at risk. It is clearly fraudulent and it simply will not stand. " During the hearing, experts warned of the health risks associated with taking certain herbal and non-herbal supplements along with prescription drugs and other FDA-approved medication. St. 's Wort, for example, may reduce the effectiveness of certain antiviral drugs. Other compounds used in supplements can cause vomiting, breathing problems, convulsions, and even coma and death when used in large amounts. Breaux was critical of existing laws that put the " burden " on the FDA to prove that products are unsafe before they can be removed from the market. That contrasts to the drug market where manufacturers must establish safety and long-term effects to get FDA approval. " It seems to me we have a serious problem which needs to be addressed, " he said. While Breaux said legislative changes appeared necessary, other senators said the onus was largely on the FBI, the Food and Drug Administration and other regulatory agencies to crack down on abuse using existing laws. " Clearly we must enforce the law, remove the threat of dangerous products from the market, and bring to justice criminals who prey on the frightened and hopeless, " said Sen. Larry Craig of Idaho, the ranking Republican on the committee. " At the same time, we should remain wary of calls for expansive regulations that may restrict an individual's freedom to make his or her own health decisions. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.