Guest guest Posted August 9, 2005 Report Share Posted August 9, 2005 Hi All, It seems from the not pdf-available below paper that " survival, body weights, body fat, fat-related serum chemistry parameters, and incidences of heart, kidney and liver microscopic changes " were selectively affected by CR among the t " oxicologic and carcinogenic effects of DAG (diacylglycerol) oil " . Food Chem Toxicol. 2005 Aug 3; [Epub ahead of print] Related Articles, Links A 24-month dietary carcinogenicity study of DAG (diacylglycerol) in rats. Chengelis CP, Kirkpatrick JB, Bruner RH, Freshwater L, Morita O, Tamaki Y, Suzuki H. Toxicologic and carcinogenic effects of DAG (diacylglycerol) oil, administered in diet for 24 months to Crl:CD(®)(SD)-IGS BR rats, were evaluated using diet-restricted and ad libitum-fed groups. All dietary fat (consistently 5.5%) was provided by DAG and/or the control article, TG (triacylglycerol) oil. Dietary concentrations (% DAG/% TG) were 0%/5.5%, 1%/4.5%, 2.75%/2.75% and 5.5%/0%. Separate groups were fed the 0%/5.5% and 5.5%/0% diets ad libitum. Another group received the standard rodent diet (fat content 4.5%) on the restricted feeding regimen. Clinical condition, ophthalmic findings, palpable mass occurrence, body composition, clinical pathology parameters and incidence of neoplastic lesions were unaffected by DAG in comparison to TG. Groups fed the 5.5% (DAG and/or TG) fat diet when compared to the 4.5% fat diet group displayed lower survival, higher body weights, organ weights, percent body fat, higher fat-related serum chemistry parameters, incidence of microscopic changes in the heart, kidneys, liver, bone marrow, spleen, and incidences of pituitary and mammary gland neoplasms. Parameters more affected in all the ad libitum groups than in the restricted diet groups (regardless of test article) fed the same diet included survival, body weights, body fat, fat-related serum chemistry parameters, and incidences of heart, kidney and liver microscopic changes. However, the DAG and TG ad libitum-fed groups were not different from one another. Thus, DAG-treated animals had no higher risk of carcinogenic effects than rats fed on similar feeding regimens with a diet in which all dietary fat came from TG. PMID: 16084639 Al Pater, PhD; email: old542000@... ____________________________________________________ Start your day with - make it your home page http://www./r/hs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.