Guest guest Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 Hi JW: Oooops, sorry. Correction, shorter people live longer than tall people ........... I believe. Rodney. > > Just a synopsis of IGF-1 from Hadley's endocrinology. (a monogram- > ha) > > > > Hadley describes IGF-I as a molecule that resembles insulin to > which has been added amino acids (pg 259). He suggests the two > evolved from a common molecule that performs the two functions: the > metabolic function of insulin and the growth function of IGF-I. > > It is certain that without IGF-I, humans are smaller (dwarfism) and > too much results in gigantism. (pg 263,4). Pygmies, eg, express lower > levels of IGF-I. (IGF-II does not seem to be involved in growth.) > > Some cells have insulin receptors and some cells have IGF-1 > receptors. Because the molecules are similar, both can share > receptors. " Insulin is more potent in stimulating metabolic effects > than IGF-I and IGF-II. On the other hand, insulin is less potent > stimulating cell proliferation than {IGF-I and IGF-II}. " > > > > Pituitary ->somatotropin (STH) -> Liver, other tissues -> > somatomedins, IGF-I, IGF-II > > > > Somatomedin hypothesis: STH stimulates chondrogenesis by way of > somatomedins. STH, not IGF-I, stimulates the multiplication of slowly > cycling cells. IGF-I acts on the proliferation of the resulting > chondrocytes. > > > > Feedback control: > > Pg 262 shows the control from CNS to the hypothalmus which releases > somatocrinin(+) and somatostatin (-) to cause the pituitary to > release STH. > > Feedback control: (pg 261) > > IGF-I stimulates hypothalmic somatostatin release and inhibits > pituitary STH release. > > > > My take: > > If you believe the growth system stays intact, then IGF-1 is lower > for smaller people and falls at age because of less requirement for > bone growth. I suspect driven by some sympathetic nervous system > feedback to the brain. > > If I believe the parts fail due to aging or disease, and I'm sure > they must in some cases, IGF-I might be lower because of less STH, or > liver function failure, but other tissues can generate IGF-I. > > OTOH, higher levels than required at age, might be due to failure > of the feedback control systems. > > > > Pygmies don't live longer. > > > > So what are the cancer implications? > > Look at: > > http://tinyurl.com/8caln > > > > http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/73/2/401? > maxtoshow= & HITS=10 & hits=10 & RESULTFORMAT=1 & author2=cohen & title=Insulin- > like+growth+ & andorexacttitle=phrase & andorexacttitleabs=and & andorexactf > ulltext=and & searchid=1125076434843_3264 & stored_search= & FIRSTINDEX=20 & s > ortspec=relevance > > Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), IGF receptors, and IGF- binding > proteins in primary cultures of prostate epithelial cells > > P Cohen, DM Peehl, G Lamson and RG Rosenfeld > > > > > > And look at the ref articles below it. The abstracts indicate sorta > the history of thought about IGFs, etc in relation to cancer, from > 1996 to 2005. > > > > It seems to me the emphasis shifted from IGF-I, to more complex > things, like IGFBP, receptors. > > > > starting with: > > " A strong positive association was observed between IGF-I levels > and prostate cancer risk. Men in the highest quartile of IGF-I levels > had a relative risk of 4.3 (95 percent confidence interval 1.8 to > 10.6) compared with men in the lowest quartile. This association was > independent of baseline prostate-specific antigen levels. > Identification of plasma IGF-I as a predictor of prostate cancer risk > may have implications for risk reduction and treatment. " PMID: > 9438850 > > > > to: > > Interrelation of Energy Intake, Body Size, and Physical Activity > with Prostate Cancer in a Large Prospective Cohort Study > > Although energy intake is known to be imperfectly measured by > questionnaire, we observed a positive association between energy > intake and metastatic or fatal prostate cancer among men who were > leaner, more physically active, younger, and who had a family history > of prostate cancer. Our observations suggest the testable hypothesis > that the elevated risk of clinically important prostate cancer in men > with a high energy intake may be attributable to certain metabolic > profiles that favor enhanced growth factor production over an > increase in adiposity. > > > > including: > > Physical Activity and the Risk of Prostate Cancer in The > Netherlands Cohort Study, Results after 9.3 Years of Follow-up > > Discussion: The results of this current study do not support the > hypothesis that physical activity protects against prostate cancer in > men. > > > > > > Other implications? > > > > The American Journal of Cardiology > > Volume 90 . Number 12 . December 15, 2002 > > Effect of congestive heart failure on the insulin-like growth > factor-1 system > > > > " Our study shows that in an elderly population of patients > hospitalized for CHF, there was a significant decrease in total IGF- > 1, a profound decrease in IGFBP-3, and a marked increase in > circulating free IGF-1. The decrease in total IGF-1 was not present > in patients who received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 Hi JW: Oooops, sorry. Correction, shorter people live longer than tall people ........... I believe. Rodney. > > Just a synopsis of IGF-1 from Hadley's endocrinology. (a monogram- > ha) > > > > Hadley describes IGF-I as a molecule that resembles insulin to > which has been added amino acids (pg 259). He suggests the two > evolved from a common molecule that performs the two functions: the > metabolic function of insulin and the growth function of IGF-I. > > It is certain that without IGF-I, humans are smaller (dwarfism) and > too much results in gigantism. (pg 263,4). Pygmies, eg, express lower > levels of IGF-I. (IGF-II does not seem to be involved in growth.) > > Some cells have insulin receptors and some cells have IGF-1 > receptors. Because the molecules are similar, both can share > receptors. " Insulin is more potent in stimulating metabolic effects > than IGF-I and IGF-II. On the other hand, insulin is less potent > stimulating cell proliferation than {IGF-I and IGF-II}. " > > > > Pituitary ->somatotropin (STH) -> Liver, other tissues -> > somatomedins, IGF-I, IGF-II > > > > Somatomedin hypothesis: STH stimulates chondrogenesis by way of > somatomedins. STH, not IGF-I, stimulates the multiplication of slowly > cycling cells. IGF-I acts on the proliferation of the resulting > chondrocytes. > > > > Feedback control: > > Pg 262 shows the control from CNS to the hypothalmus which releases > somatocrinin(+) and somatostatin (-) to cause the pituitary to > release STH. > > Feedback control: (pg 261) > > IGF-I stimulates hypothalmic somatostatin release and inhibits > pituitary STH release. > > > > My take: > > If you believe the growth system stays intact, then IGF-1 is lower > for smaller people and falls at age because of less requirement for > bone growth. I suspect driven by some sympathetic nervous system > feedback to the brain. > > If I believe the parts fail due to aging or disease, and I'm sure > they must in some cases, IGF-I might be lower because of less STH, or > liver function failure, but other tissues can generate IGF-I. > > OTOH, higher levels than required at age, might be due to failure > of the feedback control systems. > > > > Pygmies don't live longer. > > > > So what are the cancer implications? > > Look at: > > http://tinyurl.com/8caln > > > > http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/73/2/401? > maxtoshow= & HITS=10 & hits=10 & RESULTFORMAT=1 & author2=cohen & title=Insulin- > like+growth+ & andorexacttitle=phrase & andorexacttitleabs=and & andorexactf > ulltext=and & searchid=1125076434843_3264 & stored_search= & FIRSTINDEX=20 & s > ortspec=relevance > > Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), IGF receptors, and IGF- binding > proteins in primary cultures of prostate epithelial cells > > P Cohen, DM Peehl, G Lamson and RG Rosenfeld > > > > > > And look at the ref articles below it. The abstracts indicate sorta > the history of thought about IGFs, etc in relation to cancer, from > 1996 to 2005. > > > > It seems to me the emphasis shifted from IGF-I, to more complex > things, like IGFBP, receptors. > > > > starting with: > > " A strong positive association was observed between IGF-I levels > and prostate cancer risk. Men in the highest quartile of IGF-I levels > had a relative risk of 4.3 (95 percent confidence interval 1.8 to > 10.6) compared with men in the lowest quartile. This association was > independent of baseline prostate-specific antigen levels. > Identification of plasma IGF-I as a predictor of prostate cancer risk > may have implications for risk reduction and treatment. " PMID: > 9438850 > > > > to: > > Interrelation of Energy Intake, Body Size, and Physical Activity > with Prostate Cancer in a Large Prospective Cohort Study > > Although energy intake is known to be imperfectly measured by > questionnaire, we observed a positive association between energy > intake and metastatic or fatal prostate cancer among men who were > leaner, more physically active, younger, and who had a family history > of prostate cancer. Our observations suggest the testable hypothesis > that the elevated risk of clinically important prostate cancer in men > with a high energy intake may be attributable to certain metabolic > profiles that favor enhanced growth factor production over an > increase in adiposity. > > > > including: > > Physical Activity and the Risk of Prostate Cancer in The > Netherlands Cohort Study, Results after 9.3 Years of Follow-up > > Discussion: The results of this current study do not support the > hypothesis that physical activity protects against prostate cancer in > men. > > > > > > Other implications? > > > > The American Journal of Cardiology > > Volume 90 . Number 12 . December 15, 2002 > > Effect of congestive heart failure on the insulin-like growth > factor-1 system > > > > " Our study shows that in an elderly population of patients > hospitalized for CHF, there was a significant decrease in total IGF- > 1, a profound decrease in IGFBP-3, and a marked increase in > circulating free IGF-1. The decrease in total IGF-1 was not present > in patients who received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.