Guest guest Posted October 28, 2005 Report Share Posted October 28, 2005 Move it or lose it? Supposing for one second that this disease has dietary ogigins, would not the physiological stress occasioned by exercise just speed up its development if dietary defficiencies remain uncorrected? Just like calcium supplementation, exercise just does not seem like the adequate answer to this problem. > > Lots of info and links regarding osteoporosis here. Haven't had the > chance to review much of it yet, but as always please make us aware if > you find smthg especially juicy > > http://www.osteofound.org/press_centre/pr_2005_10_20_1.html > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2005 Report Share Posted October 28, 2005 Move it or lose it? Supposing for one second that this disease has dietary ogigins, would not the physiological stress occasioned by exercise just speed up its development if dietary defficiencies remain uncorrected? Just like calcium supplementation, exercise just does not seem like the adequate answer to this problem. > > Lots of info and links regarding osteoporosis here. Haven't had the > chance to review much of it yet, but as always please make us aware if > you find smthg especially juicy > > http://www.osteofound.org/press_centre/pr_2005_10_20_1.html > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2005 Report Share Posted October 29, 2005 Actually, there are many studies (I'll attach a summary article below) that have established over and over that physiological stress on the bones is *necessary* to strengthen the bones. That's why astronauts in space need to keep exercising (strengthening bones and muscles). Cochrane Review on exercise for preventing and treating osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. http://tinyurl.com/dkzka You're right that dietary deficiencies still need to be corrected in order to improve bone density, but you are incorrect about physiologic stress being worse for bones under those conditions. Obese people often have lousy diets and very strong bones. Diane > > > > Lots of info and links regarding osteoporosis here. Haven't had the > > chance to review much of it yet, but as always please make us aware if > > you find smthg especially juicy > > > > http://www.osteofound.org/press_centre/pr_2005_10_20_1.html > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2005 Report Share Posted October 29, 2005 Actually, there are many studies (I'll attach a summary article below) that have established over and over that physiological stress on the bones is *necessary* to strengthen the bones. That's why astronauts in space need to keep exercising (strengthening bones and muscles). Cochrane Review on exercise for preventing and treating osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. http://tinyurl.com/dkzka You're right that dietary deficiencies still need to be corrected in order to improve bone density, but you are incorrect about physiologic stress being worse for bones under those conditions. Obese people often have lousy diets and very strong bones. Diane > > > > Lots of info and links regarding osteoporosis here. Haven't had the > > chance to review much of it yet, but as always please make us aware if > > you find smthg especially juicy > > > > http://www.osteofound.org/press_centre/pr_2005_10_20_1.html > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2005 Report Share Posted October 29, 2005 Hi folks: And also don't forget the study posted here some months ago which showed that rats that SWAM for exercise - generally not considered weight-bearing - also had much improved bone mass. It is far from clear to me that I have a good grasp of the fundamental principles involved in this issue. (Is it the stress of weight on bones, or flexing of muscles, or something else no one has thought of that explains the effect?). But yes, exercise has been shown quite often to improve bone mass, as has taking supplements of calcium/vitamin D, of course. (Posted here often). The most interesting new (to me) information I have read on this topic recently was the Mirkin email item I posted here which claimed that stem cells in bone can either produce bone cells or fat cells. This seems like this might turn out to be a big issue. If correct. If anyone finds more information on this please post. Rodney. > > > > > > Lots of info and links regarding osteoporosis here. Haven't had the > > > chance to review much of it yet, but as always please make us aware if > > > you find smthg especially juicy > > > > > > http://www.osteofound.org/press_centre/pr_2005_10_20_1.html > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2005 Report Share Posted October 29, 2005 Hi folks: And also don't forget the study posted here some months ago which showed that rats that SWAM for exercise - generally not considered weight-bearing - also had much improved bone mass. It is far from clear to me that I have a good grasp of the fundamental principles involved in this issue. (Is it the stress of weight on bones, or flexing of muscles, or something else no one has thought of that explains the effect?). But yes, exercise has been shown quite often to improve bone mass, as has taking supplements of calcium/vitamin D, of course. (Posted here often). The most interesting new (to me) information I have read on this topic recently was the Mirkin email item I posted here which claimed that stem cells in bone can either produce bone cells or fat cells. This seems like this might turn out to be a big issue. If correct. If anyone finds more information on this please post. Rodney. > > > > > > Lots of info and links regarding osteoporosis here. Haven't had the > > > chance to review much of it yet, but as always please make us aware if > > > you find smthg especially juicy > > > > > > http://www.osteofound.org/press_centre/pr_2005_10_20_1.html > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2005 Report Share Posted October 29, 2005 Rodney wrote: > Hi folks: > > And also don't forget the study posted here some months ago which > showed that rats that SWAM for exercise - generally not considered > weight-bearing - also had much improved bone mass. Interesting, I remember reading that it also will tend to raise the 5 of fat in a human when they exercise in a pool, although it was speculated that that was related to pool temperature. I am in the process of building a new house that will probably have a pool, primarily for exercise. Positive Dennis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2005 Report Share Posted October 29, 2005 Rodney wrote: > Hi folks: > > And also don't forget the study posted here some months ago which > showed that rats that SWAM for exercise - generally not considered > weight-bearing - also had much improved bone mass. Interesting, I remember reading that it also will tend to raise the 5 of fat in a human when they exercise in a pool, although it was speculated that that was related to pool temperature. I am in the process of building a new house that will probably have a pool, primarily for exercise. Positive Dennis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2005 Report Share Posted October 29, 2005 Dennis De Jarnette wrote: Rodney wrote: > Hi folks: > > And also don't forget the study posted here some months ago which > showed that rats that SWAM for exercise - generally not considered > weight-bearing - also had much improved bone mass. Interesting, I remember reading that it also will tend to raise the 5 sorry for the waste of bandwidth that is % not 5. Sorry Francesca. LOL Positive Dennis of fat in a human when they exercise in a pool, although it was speculated that that was related to pool temperature. I am in the process of building a new house that will probably have a pool, primarily for exercise. Positive Dennis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2005 Report Share Posted October 29, 2005 Dennis De Jarnette wrote: Rodney wrote: > Hi folks: > > And also don't forget the study posted here some months ago which > showed that rats that SWAM for exercise - generally not considered > weight-bearing - also had much improved bone mass. Interesting, I remember reading that it also will tend to raise the 5 sorry for the waste of bandwidth that is % not 5. Sorry Francesca. LOL Positive Dennis of fat in a human when they exercise in a pool, although it was speculated that that was related to pool temperature. I am in the process of building a new house that will probably have a pool, primarily for exercise. Positive Dennis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2005 Report Share Posted October 29, 2005 I recall the pitcher, Sandy Koufax, who retired because of arthritis - x-rays of his left pitching arm showed bone wall thickness like twice that of the right arm. I think that's do the muscle pulling on the bone - a force balance system. So I conclude that the bone builds to carry the stress of the muscle on the bone, regardless of the exercise. Swimming seems to me the same type of exercise maybe not as intense, but may be better for exercising all muscles. So maybe if I pick up 100# over my head it strengthens all the bones in the path, but once it's there the strain on the bone takes over. Implying to me maybe the weight of a person standing is not as good as using the muscles as in walking, etc. Astronaut exercises are dynamic, as I recall. Regards. [ ] Re: International Osteoporosis Foundation Hi folks:And also don't forget the study posted here some months ago which showed that rats that SWAM for exercise - generally not considered weight-bearing - also had much improved bone mass.It is far from clear to me that I have a good grasp of the fundamental principles involved in this issue. (Is it the stress of weight on bones, or flexing of muscles, or something else no one has thought of that explains the effect?). But yes, exercise has been shown quite often to improve bone mass, as has taking supplements of calcium/vitamin D, of course. (Posted here often).The most interesting new (to me) information I have read on this topic recently was the Mirkin email item I posted here which claimed that stem cells in bone can either produce bone cells or fat cells.This seems like this might turn out to be a big issue. If correct. If anyone finds more information on this please post.Rodney.>> Actually, there are many studies (I'll attach a summary article below)> that have established over and over that physiological stress on the> bones is *necessary* to strengthen the bones. That's why astronauts> in space need to keep exercising (strengthening bones and muscles). > > Cochrane Review on exercise for preventing and treating osteoporosis> in postmenopausal women.> > http://tinyurl.com/dkzka> > You're right that dietary deficiencies still need to be corrected in> order to improve bone density, but you are incorrect about physiologic> stress being worse for bones under those conditions. Obese people> often have lousy diets and very strong bones.> > Diane> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2005 Report Share Posted October 29, 2005 I recall the pitcher, Sandy Koufax, who retired because of arthritis - x-rays of his left pitching arm showed bone wall thickness like twice that of the right arm. I think that's do the muscle pulling on the bone - a force balance system. So I conclude that the bone builds to carry the stress of the muscle on the bone, regardless of the exercise. Swimming seems to me the same type of exercise maybe not as intense, but may be better for exercising all muscles. So maybe if I pick up 100# over my head it strengthens all the bones in the path, but once it's there the strain on the bone takes over. Implying to me maybe the weight of a person standing is not as good as using the muscles as in walking, etc. Astronaut exercises are dynamic, as I recall. Regards. [ ] Re: International Osteoporosis Foundation Hi folks:And also don't forget the study posted here some months ago which showed that rats that SWAM for exercise - generally not considered weight-bearing - also had much improved bone mass.It is far from clear to me that I have a good grasp of the fundamental principles involved in this issue. (Is it the stress of weight on bones, or flexing of muscles, or something else no one has thought of that explains the effect?). But yes, exercise has been shown quite often to improve bone mass, as has taking supplements of calcium/vitamin D, of course. (Posted here often).The most interesting new (to me) information I have read on this topic recently was the Mirkin email item I posted here which claimed that stem cells in bone can either produce bone cells or fat cells.This seems like this might turn out to be a big issue. If correct. If anyone finds more information on this please post.Rodney.>> Actually, there are many studies (I'll attach a summary article below)> that have established over and over that physiological stress on the> bones is *necessary* to strengthen the bones. That's why astronauts> in space need to keep exercising (strengthening bones and muscles). > > Cochrane Review on exercise for preventing and treating osteoporosis> in postmenopausal women.> > http://tinyurl.com/dkzka> > You're right that dietary deficiencies still need to be corrected in> order to improve bone density, but you are incorrect about physiologic> stress being worse for bones under those conditions. Obese people> often have lousy diets and very strong bones.> > Diane> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.