Guest guest Posted October 18, 2005 Report Share Posted October 18, 2005 Hi All, Do you ever feel " that fat is the bomb and carbohydrate is the fuse " ? CR is the bomb shelter? See the pdf-available not yet in Medline and maybe free to all below that discusses a similarly hopefully free to all paper. When is a high fat diet not a high fat diet? D Feinman Nutrition & Metabolism 2005, 2:27 (17 October 2005) Editorial No abstract (17 October 2005) http://www.nutritionandmetabolism.com/content/2/1/27 The observation that a high fat/low carbohydrate (CHO) diet has a beneficial effect on a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) published today is notable given previous results showing that high fat diets have a deleterious effect on AD. Van de Auwera, et al. [1] reported that mice fed a ketogenic diet (<1% carbohydrate, 80% fat ) were found to have a 25% decrease in the protein Aß42 compared to mice fed a standard high- carbohydrate, low-fat chow diet. Aß42 is particularly amyloidogenic mutant form of the amyloid precursor protein whose proteolytic product ß–amyloid peptide is contained in the plaques and neurofibrillar tangles that are characteristic of AD. .... Similarity of starvation and carbohydrate restriction One of the areas bearing on the idea that disposition of fat is controlled by insulin is the observation made by several groups that the metabolic response to starvation resembles the response to carbohydrate restriction [7-11]. An important but, in our view, under- appreciated study is that of Klein & Wolfe [11] who compared responses of subjects on an 84 hour fast to the same subjects on a similar fast in which lipids were infused at a level equal to resting energy requirements. Table 1 shows that the levels of fatty acid, rates of oxidation and levels of glucose and ketone bodies were similar in the two groups (Table 1). These rather dramatic results were summarized by the authors as demonstrating that “carbohydrate restriction, not the presence of a negative energy balance, is responsible for initiating the metabolic response to fasting.” It might be said that this is the key experiment in understanding the interaction between fat and carbohydrate. Similarly, Bisschop, et al. [8] demonstrated a similarity between high carbohydrate, low fat diets (CHO:Lipid:Protein = 85:0:15) and control (44:41:15) diets in FFA rate of appearance and oxidation but significant differences with a low carbohydrate, high fat diet (CHO:Lipid:Protein = 2:83:15). High fat diets in obesity The interaction of fat and carbohydrate bear on the mechanism of weight loss strategies based on carbohydrate restriction. In considering the problem, it is important to recognize that percentages are misleading. There are really three degrees of freedom in design or analysis of a weight loss experiment: two of the three macronutrients and the total caloric intake. It is unlikely that the percentage rather than the absolute amount of macronutrients is the controlling variable and at least three published studies show that carbohydrate reduction is not necessarily accompanied by replacement with either fat or protein but rather caloric reduction due to the carbohydrate removed [12-14]. Such diets are effectively high fat by percentages but lead to substantial weight loss. To understand the relative impact of carbohydrate and fat, one has to consider experiments in which one macronutrient is replaced by another. Several studies in the literature have demonstrated that in isocaloric comparisons, the replacement of dietary carbohydrate with fat leads to greater weight loss [15-19], that is, the absence of the fuse prevents an explosive effect of dietary fat on body mass. The limitations of the fat bomb per se are reviewed by Willett and Leibel [20]. .... the study of Garg, et al. [26, 27]. In a four-center randomized crossover trial, carbohydrate was replaced with monounsaturated fats (CHO: 55 % –> 40; total fat: 30% –> 45) or, conversely, MUF was replaced with CHO. It was found that replacement of MUF with carbohydrate “caused persistent deterioration of glycemic control and accentuation of hyperinsulinemia, as well as increased plasma triglyceride and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, which may not be desirable [26],” that is, the high fat arm was beneficial, again, suggesting that what happened to the fat was more important than its concentration in the diet. To determine the relative importance of fat and carbohydrate and protein, Gannon and coworkers have measured the effect of replacement of carbohydrate with protein and fat in patients with type 2 diabetes [28]. Figure 1 shows the effects on glycemic control of the replacement of carbohydrate with protein and fat. Again, the 50 % fat diet provides better glycemic control although, in this case, the relative contributions of carbohydrate reduction and increase in protein is unknown. Conclusion The long range implication of Van de Auwera’s study for AD remains to be seen but the general lesson is that in dietary recommendations or in testing animal models a diet should not be characterized as high fat without also specifying the level of carbohydrate. 1. Van der Auwera I, Wera S, Van Leuven F, ST: A ketogenic diet reduces amyloid beta 40 and 42 in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease 2005 Nutr Metab (Lond) 2005. 2 http://www.nutritionandmetabolism.com/content/pdf/1743-7075-2-28.pdf Al Pater, PhD; email: old542000@... __________________________________ - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.