Guest guest Posted October 1, 2005 Report Share Posted October 1, 2005 Hi All, An interesting model for how humans may be affected by CR has been presented and described in a model system using our close cousins, the rhesus monkeys. It may interest those of us who monitor our BMI that BMI was very similar in the rhesus monkeys and they responded similarly to CR in this regard. However, also revealed appears to be a great variability in the responses of the individual monkeys to CR, in terms of BMI, hormones and menstruation parameters. Similar variability may occur in human CRers? The punch line of the full-text seemed to be that the system may be a model for the effects of CR on our bones. The response to CR of our bone health may interest us CRers with regard how variable may be our bone health and how their health may variably be affected by our BMI and CR. Definition of the rhesus monkey is: rhesus: A monkey; the bhunder. bhunder: An Indian monkey (Macacus Rhesus), protected by the Hindoos as sacred. See Rhesus. The pdf is available and its unaltered presentation displayed tables in partially mirror image. It was difficult to partially compensate for this. The result of the compensation is inferior to the presentation in the original pdf, which was the only available full-text format that was available. Lujan ME, Krzemien AA, Reid RL, Van Vugt DA. Developing a model of nutritional amenorrhea in rhesus monkeys. Endocrinology. 2005 Sep 29; [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 16195399 Nutritional amenorrhea is defined as cessation of menstrual cycles resulting from a chronic negative energy balance. While it is agreed that nutritional amenorrhea results from reduced secretion of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH), the neuroendocrine mechanisms leading to GnRH inhibition are poorly defined. Because the invasiveness of many neuroendocrine experimental approaches precludes its use in the clinical setting, we set out to establish a model of nutritional amenorrhea in rhesus monkeys. Studies were conducted in four normal weight and one obese female rhesus monkey. Dietary intake was gradually reduced with the goal of achieving a 15 - 20% weight reduction. Dietary restriction inhibited ovulation in all animals. The weight loss required to inhibit ovulation ranged from 2 - 11% in the four normal weight animals and was achieved with a 23% reduction in dietary intake. The time of initiating reduced food intake to first missed ovulation was 62 +/- 13 days. Greater weight loss (46% reduction) over a longer period (10 months) was required to inhibit ovulation in the obese monkey. The onset of anovulation was not preceded by changes in menstrual cycle length or progesterone secretion. Re-alimentation initiated ovulation at a weight that approximated the animal's weight at the time of the last ovulatory cycle during dietary restriction. By contrast, caloric intake at the return of ovulation during re-alimentation was 28% greater. This is the first demonstration that chronic dietary restriction can inhibit ovulation in rhesus monkeys. This model will be useful for studying the neuroendocrine mechanisms involved in diet-induced anovulation in primates. Al Pater, PhD; email: old542000@... __________________________________ - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.