Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 Hi All, The below may interest us in the pdfs-available below papers in Arch Intern Med. 2005 Dec 12;165(22), but not Medline yet. First, there is an apparently free-to-all paper on whom the people rely on for information regarding medical conditions. Internet use is the major source, it seems, as opposed to doctors, who were more trusted. In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2555. Trust and Sources of Health Information The environment in which patients consume medical information is in flux as health information becomes more common online and patients adopt a more proactive approach to medical decision making. Hesse et al used baseline data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (a nationally representative telephone survey sponsored by the National Institutes of Health) to analyze trust and use patterns across different communication channels in the new environment. Indicators of trust were shown to be highest for physicians as a valued source of information, but indicators of use showed a predilection toward using the Internet as the information source of first resort. Trust and Sources of Health Information The Impact of the Internet and Its Implications for Health Care Providers: Findings From the First Health Information National Trends Survey Bradford W. Hesse, PhD; E. , MD, MPH; L. Kreps, PhD; T. Croyle, PhD; Neeraj K. Arora, PhD; Barbara K. Rimer, PhD; Kasisomayajula Viswanath, PhD Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2618-2624. ABSTRACT Background The context in which patients consume health information has changed dramatically with diffusion of the Internet, advances in telemedicine, and changes in media health coverage. The objective of this study was to provide nationally representative estimates for health-related uses of the Internet, level of trust in health information sources, and preferences for cancer information sources. Methods Data from the Health Information National Trends Survey were used. A total of 6369 persons 18 years or older were studied. The main outcome measures were online health activities, levels of trust, and source preference. Results Analyses indicated that 63.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.7%-64.3%) of the US adult population in 2003 reported ever going online, with 63.7% (95% CI, 61.7%-65.8%) of the online population having looked for health information for themselves or others at least once in the previous 12 months. Despite newly available communication channels, physicians remained the most highly trusted information source to patients, with 62.4% (95% CI, 60.8%-64.0%) of adults expressing a lot of trust in their physicians. When asked where they preferred going for specific health information, 49.5% (95% CI, 48.1%-50.8%) reported wanting to go to their physicians first. When asked where they actually went, 48.6% (95% CI, 46.1%-51.0%) reported going online first, with only 10.9% (95% CI, 9.5%-12.3%) going to their physicians first. Conclusion The Health Information National Trends Survey data portray a tectonic shift in the ways in which patients consume health and medical information, with more patients looking for information online before talking with their physicians. http://archinte.ama-assn.org.qe2a-proxy.mun.ca/cgi/content/full/165/22/2618 Tea consumption associated with much less ovarian cancer. Being a prospective study was good. In This Issue of Archives of Internal Medicine Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2555. Tea Consumption and Ovarian Cancer Risk in a Population-Based Cohort Evidence from laboratory studies indicates that green and black tea preparations may protect against various cancers. The possible protective role of tea consumption against the development of ovarian cancer in humans is unclear. This study prospectively examined tea consumption in relation to the risk of ovarian cancer in a population-based cohort of 61,057 women. The authors ascertained 301 incident cases of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer during an average follow-up of 15.1 years. After controlling for relevant risk factors, compared with women who never or seldom consumed tea, those who consumed 2 or more cups of tea per day had a 46% lower risk of ovarian cancer (rate ratio, 0.54). These findings suggest that tea consumption may lower the risk of ovarian cancer. Tea Consumption and Ovarian Cancer Risk in a Population-Based Cohort na C. Larsson, MSc; Alicja Wolk, DMSc Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2683-2686. ABSTRACT Background Substantial evidence from laboratory studies indicates that green and black tea preparations may protect against various cancers. Few epidemiologic studies, however, have examined the relationship specifically between tea consumption and risk of ovarian cancer. Methods We prospectively examined the association between tea consumption and risk of ovarian cancer in 61,057 women aged 40 to 76 years who were participants in the population-based Swedish Mammography Cohort. Participants completed a validated 67-item food frequency questionnaire at enrollment between 1987 and 1990 and were followed for cancer incidence through December 2004. Results During an average follow-up of 15.1 years, 301 incident cases of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer were ascertained. Tea consumption was inversely associated with the risk of ovarian cancer after controlling for potential confounders (P for trend, .03). Compared with women who never or seldom (less than monthly) consumed tea, the multivariate hazard ratios for those who consumed less than 1 cup per day, 1 cup per day, and 2 or more cups per day were 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-1.08), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.56-1.04), and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.31-0.91), respectively. Each additional cup of tea per day was associated with an 18% lower risk of ovarian cancer (multivariate hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.99). Conclusion These results suggest that tea consumption is associated with a reduced risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in a dose-response manner. " ... The models were stratified by age in months and the year of recruitment. The multivariate models were also simultaneously controlled for body mass index, education, parity, use of oral contraceptives, and intakes of total energy, fruit, vegetables, milk, liquor, beer, wine, and coffee. ... " The importance of sleep for health is to be the subject in the journal in the future. Sweet dreams. Al Pater, PhD; email: old542000@... __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.