Guest guest Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 Dean Pomeroy, active on the CRSOC list went through such testing a few years back to make sense of intake and absorption. You might do a search through their archives if you really want to dig into that s..... stuff. I consider it waste. Merry December.. only a couple more days till something JR Rodney wrote: > Hi Katrina: > > A couple of additional points on this issue: > > First, perhaps stool testing could determine what nutrients we are > not absorbing. But I have never heard of such tests. > > Second, my guess is that people who throughout their lives are able > to, and do, eat as much as they want without putting on weight, are > those who do have an intestinal absorption issue. Now if it is just > fat or carbohydrate calories they are failing to absorb then likely > there is no problem. But if protein or other nutrients are part of > it then presumably they will suffer the problems associated with > nutrient deficiencies. > > While the above makes sense to me, I am not aware of cases where it > has been shown that people who were eating plenty of, say, vitamin C, > still suffer from scurvy. Or those consuming plenty of vitamin D but > still have rickets. So perhaps I am out-to-lunch about this? > > The absorption issue, as far as I can see, just never seems to be > discussed. Is this because it never happens? Or because it is an > under-recognized phenomenon? > > Rodney. > > >>> > http://www.nationalenzymecompany.com/data_files/TNO_Research_Web.pdf >>> This study supposedly shows that enzymes improve the > bioavailability >>> of carbs and proteins. I wonder what effect this will have on >> CRON? >>> If we absorb more of what we eat, will that make us age more >> quickly, >>> or will we simply remain more healthy during those years and thus >>> elongate our life even further? >>> >>> I've been on fairly high-dose enzymes for a few weeks now, and I > go >> to >>> the bathroom about a quarter of the number of times that I used > to >> go. >>> I also produce less waste with each visit. Sorry once again if >> this >>> is too much info, but this seems like a very important topic. >>> >>> Yes, I'm aware that I am probably challenged in the alimentary >>> absorption arena, but the above study implies similar effects > even >> in >>> ideal conditions. However, it was done under artificial > conditions, >>> so take the data with a pinch of salt. I only mention the study >>> because my anecdotal experience backs it up. I " feel " like I am >>> absorbing and utilitising my food more. >>> >>> Katrina. >>> > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 Dean Pomeroy, active on the CRSOC list went through such testing a few years back to make sense of intake and absorption. You might do a search through their archives if you really want to dig into that s..... stuff. I consider it waste. Merry December.. only a couple more days till something JR Rodney wrote: > Hi Katrina: > > A couple of additional points on this issue: > > First, perhaps stool testing could determine what nutrients we are > not absorbing. But I have never heard of such tests. > > Second, my guess is that people who throughout their lives are able > to, and do, eat as much as they want without putting on weight, are > those who do have an intestinal absorption issue. Now if it is just > fat or carbohydrate calories they are failing to absorb then likely > there is no problem. But if protein or other nutrients are part of > it then presumably they will suffer the problems associated with > nutrient deficiencies. > > While the above makes sense to me, I am not aware of cases where it > has been shown that people who were eating plenty of, say, vitamin C, > still suffer from scurvy. Or those consuming plenty of vitamin D but > still have rickets. So perhaps I am out-to-lunch about this? > > The absorption issue, as far as I can see, just never seems to be > discussed. Is this because it never happens? Or because it is an > under-recognized phenomenon? > > Rodney. > > >>> > http://www.nationalenzymecompany.com/data_files/TNO_Research_Web.pdf >>> This study supposedly shows that enzymes improve the > bioavailability >>> of carbs and proteins. I wonder what effect this will have on >> CRON? >>> If we absorb more of what we eat, will that make us age more >> quickly, >>> or will we simply remain more healthy during those years and thus >>> elongate our life even further? >>> >>> I've been on fairly high-dose enzymes for a few weeks now, and I > go >> to >>> the bathroom about a quarter of the number of times that I used > to >> go. >>> I also produce less waste with each visit. Sorry once again if >> this >>> is too much info, but this seems like a very important topic. >>> >>> Yes, I'm aware that I am probably challenged in the alimentary >>> absorption arena, but the above study implies similar effects > even >> in >>> ideal conditions. However, it was done under artificial > conditions, >>> so take the data with a pinch of salt. I only mention the study >>> because my anecdotal experience backs it up. I " feel " like I am >>> absorbing and utilitising my food more. >>> >>> Katrina. >>> > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 That's a lot of perhaps. We have only associations. I'll do enzymes when it is shown they do not harm the body's ability to "screen" out what we don't need. Regards. [ ] Re: Enzymes improve bioavailability of proteins and carbs > While the above makes sense to me, I am not aware of cases where it > has been shown that people who were eating plenty of, say, vitamin C, > still suffer from scurvy. Or those consuming plenty of vitamin D but > still have rickets. So perhaps I am out-to-lunch about this?Hi Rodney,Perhaps those are extreme cases of nutrient deficiency. Perhapsmilder cases lead to mid-late-life cancer, heart problems, etc.? Allof us have read studies showing that if we eat more 'X' then we getless cancer or heart attacks.K. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 That's a lot of perhaps. We have only associations. I'll do enzymes when it is shown they do not harm the body's ability to "screen" out what we don't need. Regards. [ ] Re: Enzymes improve bioavailability of proteins and carbs > While the above makes sense to me, I am not aware of cases where it > has been shown that people who were eating plenty of, say, vitamin C, > still suffer from scurvy. Or those consuming plenty of vitamin D but > still have rickets. So perhaps I am out-to-lunch about this?Hi Rodney,Perhaps those are extreme cases of nutrient deficiency. Perhapsmilder cases lead to mid-late-life cancer, heart problems, etc.? Allof us have read studies showing that if we eat more 'X' then we getless cancer or heart attacks.K. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.