Guest guest Posted December 30, 2005 Report Share Posted December 30, 2005 Two points of interest from the recent study I just mentionted... Proc Nutr Soc. 2005 Nov;64(4):543-53. Micronutrients: dietary intake v. supplement use. Woodside JV, McCall D, McGartland C, Young IS. On low fat (high carb) diet interventions... (where the intervention is based on high fiber carbs like fruits, vegetables, whole grains, etc) " A number of studies have combined a low-fat diet with increased fruit, vegetable and whole-grain consumption. Recent observational evidence from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Ageing (Tucker et al. 2005) indicates that, over an average 18 years follow-up, the men who consumed the combination of five or more servings of fruit and vegetables per d and £12% energy from saturated fat are 31% less likely to die from any cause (P<0.05) and 76% less likely to die from CHD (P<0.001). This combination of high fruit and vegetable and low saturated fat intakes was found to be more protective than either of the interventions alone. This work is backed up by a controlled feeding study in healthy volunteers (Gardner et al. 2005) that has shown that a 4-week low-fat diet intervention that also incorporates markedly more vegetables, legumes and whole grains (therefore likely to increase micronutrient status), enhances the lipid-lowering effect of a typical low-fat diet. " On Mediterranean diet.... (it " aint " the olive oil) " It is likely that this [benficial] effect could have been the result of increased antioxidant intake, based on the suggestion by Vogel et al. (2000) that, in terms of their postprandial effect on endothelial function, the beneficial components of the Mediterranean diet appear to be antioxidant-rich foods. Their study has shown that a meal containing olive oil as a fat source reduces brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation by 31%, but this decrease is reduced by the concomitant administration of vitamins C and E (by 71%) or balsamic vinegar and salad (by 65%). " Also, the article discusses this point that I posted this once before in a discussion with Rodney. It is the data from the famous Lyons Heart Trial where the numerous headlines read " Mediterranean Diet Better Than Low Fat Diet " in 1998-2000. that the " Mediterranean Diet' actually had less fat, less saturated fat, less cholesterol, and more fiber and more EFAs than the so called " low fat " diet. " In terms of dietary change, it was found that subjects in the control group averaged (% energy): 34 from fat; 12 from saturated fat; 11 from monounsaturated fat; 6 from polyunsaturated fat; 312 mg cholesterol/d. In contrast, subjects on the Mediterranean-style diet averaged (% energy): 30 from fat; 8 from saturated fat; 13 from monounsaturated fat; 5 from polyunsaturated fat; 203 mg cholesterol/d. Those subjects on the Mediterranean diet consumed less linoleic acid (3.6% energy v. 5.3% energy), and more oleic acid (12.9% energy v. 10 . 8% energy), a-linolenic acid (18:3n-3; 0.84% energy v. 0.29% energy) and dietary fibre. Plasma fatty acid analysis conducted " after 52 weeks of follow-up confirmed the dietary fatty acid data (de Lorgeril et al. 1994). All of this only futher confirms my contention that the high fat Mediterranean Diet can be shown to be better than the typical American diet, but then again, thats not hard to do, or a huge acomplishment to boast about. But there is no evidence that this Mediterranean " style " Diet is better than a low fat, low saturated fat, high fiber diet that is based on fresh fruits, vegetables, whole grains, beans and some limited lean animal protein, and nuts/seeds. Regards Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.