Guest guest Posted September 29, 2005 Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 Hi Willie: This part is interesting: " ......... but the calorie restriction did not produce as much life extension when the diets had a high fat or high protein content as it did when the diet had a very high proportion of carbohydrates " because it seems to be consistent with the fruit fly study where restriction of carbohydrates didn't make much difference. But is it the fat or the protein that matters? Rodney. > Hi all, > > Here you have a reference that points just in another direction > regarding the issue of calories from carbs or protein. Of course, > one have to have in mind this strain of mice had a renal disease, > but it's worth reading it > > http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/83/15/5659 > > Take a look at this extract: > > " It was also of interest that the diet that promoted the very > longest life and the greatest increase in maximum life span in > these relatively short-lived mice was the diet of very high > carbohydrate, low fat, normal protein composition. However, > this diet exhibited the greatly beneficial effect only when > fed as a calorie-restricted diet. The diets higher in fat and > higher in protein permitted the increasing of longevity and life > span when fed in restricted amounts, but the calorie restriction > did not produce as much life extension when the diets > had a high fat or high protein content as it did when the diet > had a very high proportion of carbohydrates. " > > Cheers. > Willie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.