Guest guest Posted November 3, 2005 Report Share Posted November 3, 2005 Hi All, For: Cheng CM, Hicks K, Wang J, Eagles DA, Bondy CA. Caloric restriction augments brain glutamic acid decarboxylase-65 and -67 expression. J Neurosci Res. 2004 Jul 15;77(2):270-6. PMID: 15211593 Details from the available pdf may offer interest. “IGF receptor and GLUT3 expression were significantly reduced by the calorie-restricted, standard chow diet but significantly increased with the calorie-restricted, ketogenic diet”? Glucose was certainly lower with the ketogenic CR compared with the standard CR, but the ketones were at relatively huge levels. Body weights were over 50% lower for 10% CR? The role of CR of brain glutamic acid decarboxylase-65 and –67 in other brain diseases seems to be of interest. Abstract The ketogenic diet is a very low-carbohydrate, high-fat diet used to treat refractory epilepsy. We hypothesized that this diet may act by increasing expression of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), the rate-limiting enzyme in gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) synthesis. Thus, we evaluated brain GAD levels in a well-established, seizure-suppressing, rodent model of the ketogenic diet. Because the diet is most effective when administered with a modest (10%) calorie restriction, we studied three groups of animals: rats fed ad libitum standard rat chow (Ad lib-Std); calorie-restricted standard chow (CR-Std); and an isocaloric, calorie-restricted ketogenic diet (CR-Ket). We found that GAD67 mRNA was significantly increased in the inferior and superior colliculi and cerebellar cortex in both CR diet groups compared with control (e.g., by 45% in the superior colliculus and by 71% in the cerebellar cortex; P < .001). GAD65 mRNA was selectively increased in the superior colliculus and temporal cortex in both CR-Std and CR-Ket diet groups compared with ad lib controls. The only apparent CR-Ket-specific effect was a 30% increase in GAD67 mRNA in the striatum (P = .03). Enhanced GAD immunoreactivity was detected in parallel with the mRNA changes. These data clearly show that calorie restriction increases brain GAD65 and -67 expression in several brain regions, independent of ketogenic effects. These observations may explain why caloric restriction improves the efficacy of the ketogenic diet in treating epilepsy and suggest that diet modification might be useful in treatment of a number of brain disorders characterized by impaired GAD or GABA activity. Table I. Effects of Diets on Body and Brain Weights, Serum Glucose, and Ketone Levels ============================================= Ad lib-Std CR-Std Percentage of control CR-Ket Percentage of control ============================================= Body weight (g) 85.3±3.0 41.7±2.1* - 51% 42.5±3.8* -51% Brain weight (mg) 1.4±0.05 1.25±0.03* -10% 1.27±0.02* -10% Glucose (mg/dl) 179±10.5 127±15.9* -29% 57.5±7.2** -68% Ketones (mM) 0.27±0.001 0.23±0.03 No change 4.4±0.67** +1530% ============================================= The data represent means±SEM for six animals per group. * P < .01 compared with AL-Std. ** P < .0001 compared with AL-Std and CR-Std. Table II. Comparison of GAD67 and GAD65 mRNA Levels in Specific Brain Regions of Different Diet Groups ============================================= Brain region CR-Ket vs Ad lib-Std (%) P value CR-Std vs Ad lib-Std (%) P value ============================================= GAD67 Inferior colliculus 148.8±17.1 .009* 141.9±7.4 .021* Superior colliculus 146.2±5.0 .0001* 145.5±8.8 <.0001* Frontal cortex 119.3±10.1 .331 125.6±17.8 .203 Temporal cortex 127.9±15.0 .177 129.0±13.8 .160 Striatum 130.3±8.1 .032* 112.2±12.5 .358 Cerebellum 139.7±12.1 .019* 171.0±12.3 .0003* GAD65 Inferior colliculus 95.1±7.0 .663 101.2±13.1 .917 Superior colliculus 119.9±5.9 .008* 119.2±4.0 .014* Frontal cortex 100.1±11.3 .992 112.9±4.3 .332 Temporal cortex 146.3±19.0 .038* 151.7±15.8 .029* Striatum 92.2±5.7 .357 89.0±7.6 .220 Cerebellum 82.9±7.2 .209 100.8±11.7 .951 ============================================= Data are expressed as percentage of Ad lib-Std control (N = 6 per group). The quantification of hybridization signal was detailed in Materials and Methods. * Statistically significant difference was obtained by comparing different diet to Ad Lib-Std control by ANOVA, followed by Fisher's least significant difference tests. Al Pater, PhD; email: old542000@... __________________________________ - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.