Guest guest Posted September 26, 2005 Report Share Posted September 26, 2005 drsusanforshey wrote: "The weight loss came despite the fact that the women were given no limits on their portion sizes or daily calories and despite the fact that the vegan diet boosted their carbohydrate intake." Note that later in the story it says: They were, however, told to avoid added oils, nuts and seeds to keep their fat intake down. In other words portion size WAS restricted. Women in the comparison group followed a diet based on National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines, which meant restricting fat to less than 30 percent of calories and protein to about 15 percent of calories. ly 30% fat is not much of a restriction Participants, who ranged in age from 44 to 73, also attended weekly meetings that included nutrition and cooking lessons. Based on dietary records the women kept, both groups ended up reducing their calorie intake by almost 400 calories per day, on average. But those on the vegan diet lost more weight. maybe, I am curious which group would be more likely to not write down their failures? It is wise, he noted, to take a multivitamin, particularly to get enough vitamin B12, which is found naturally only in animal products. in other words a vegan diet is clearly not natural, else no pill would be needed. I have no objection to whatever an individual decides, but it seems to me that a diet that requires sublementation is not a good diet. However, one fish dish a week would be enough for the b12 I think. Positive Dennis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 26, 2005 Report Share Posted September 26, 2005 drsusanforshey wrote: "The weight loss came despite the fact that the women were given no limits on their portion sizes or daily calories and despite the fact that the vegan diet boosted their carbohydrate intake." Note that later in the story it says: They were, however, told to avoid added oils, nuts and seeds to keep their fat intake down. In other words portion size WAS restricted. Women in the comparison group followed a diet based on National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines, which meant restricting fat to less than 30 percent of calories and protein to about 15 percent of calories. ly 30% fat is not much of a restriction Participants, who ranged in age from 44 to 73, also attended weekly meetings that included nutrition and cooking lessons. Based on dietary records the women kept, both groups ended up reducing their calorie intake by almost 400 calories per day, on average. But those on the vegan diet lost more weight. maybe, I am curious which group would be more likely to not write down their failures? It is wise, he noted, to take a multivitamin, particularly to get enough vitamin B12, which is found naturally only in animal products. in other words a vegan diet is clearly not natural, else no pill would be needed. I have no objection to whatever an individual decides, but it seems to me that a diet that requires sublementation is not a good diet. However, one fish dish a week would be enough for the b12 I think. Positive Dennis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.