Guest guest Posted August 28, 2000 Report Share Posted August 28, 2000 I have a co-worker that swears that MTX gave her father the cancer he died from. I have read everything I could find on MTX and never found anything about it causing Cancer. But, the reaction from my co-worker was very real, she freaked. I've been taking it for 6 years and have only had good results from it. Becky [ ] cancer prevention I was sittin' in my easy chair a few nights ago thinking aboutmethotrexate and it's long-term negative side-effects when suddenlyit hit me like a smack on the back of the head. If MTX is a low-dose type of chemotherapy previously used for thetreatment of cancer, wouldn't it act as a cancer preventative forpeople like us who have to take it for PA?I've never read anything on this specific topic, so I'm wondering ifanyone else on the list has. It'd be nice to find a silver lining inthis cloud.Please visit our new web page at:http://www.wpunj.edu/icip/paWe are currently discussing new chat times. moderates a chat on arthritis atwww.about.com on Thursday evenings, so check thatout in the meantime! E mail at RA@... for details. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2000 Report Share Posted August 28, 2000 Well being a once upon a time chemo therapy nurse, here is the scoop on MTX. MTX is still used for cancer in combination with other drugs but at much higher doses than used for arthritis and is given IV .In high doses it kills cancer cells, it also kills good cells. In low doses it suppresses the immune system(when ones body does not fight so hard inflamation is reduced). In low doses it has not been known to produce cancer. In high doses it is known that the side effect of chemo therapy long term is to sometimes encourage the growth of another cancer. Long term cancer survivors often later get bone cancer or leukemia. Quality of life is what it is all really about. MTX is a minimal risk drug that in low doses allows people with painful arthritis to live a fairly normal life. Everyone has to decide if the result is worth the risk. Long term studies are good for most people 10 years plus as long as their liver profiles remain good. Hope that this answer is helpful. Sharon [ ] cancer prevention I was sittin' in my easy chair a few nights ago thinking aboutmethotrexate and it's long-term negative side-effects when suddenlyit hit me like a smack on the back of the head. If MTX is a low-dose type of chemotherapy previously used for thetreatment of cancer, wouldn't it act as a cancer preventative forpeople like us who have to take it for PA?I've never read anything on this specific topic, so I'm wondering ifanyone else on the list has. It'd be nice to find a silver lining inthis cloud.Please visit our new web page at:http://www.wpunj.edu/icip/paWe are currently discussing new chat times. moderates a chat on arthritis atwww.about.com on Thursday evenings, so check thatout in the meantime! E mail at RA@... for details. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2000 Report Share Posted August 29, 2000 Becky, tell your co worker that a lowered immune system allows cancer to not be fought off by the body. MTX lowers the immune response. Cancer is a complex disease perpetuated by genetic, enviornmental, viral and immune factors. All studies so far show low dose MTX to be safe for use with arthritis. I worry about Wayne and all the drugs he is on. However better he would die at old age even from cancer than at 53 years old being in so much pain he couldn't function. We discuss the risks all the time but the decision is his. Sharon [ ] cancer prevention I was sittin' in my easy chair a few nights ago thinking aboutmethotrexate and it's long-term negative side-effects when suddenlyit hit me like a smack on the back of the head. If MTX is a low-dose type of chemotherapy previously used for thetreatment of cancer, wouldn't it act as a cancer preventative forpeople like us who have to take it for PA?I've never read anything on this specific topic, so I'm wondering ifanyone else on the list has. It'd be nice to find a silver lining inthis cloud.Please visit our new web page at:http://www.wpunj.edu/icip/paWe are currently discussing new chat times. moderates a chat on arthritis atwww.about.com on Thursday evenings, so check thatout in the meantime! E mail at RA@... for details. Please visit our new web page at:http://www.wpunj.edu/icip/paWe are currently discussing new chat times. moderates a chat on arthritis atwww.about.com on Thursday evenings, so check thatout in the meantime! E mail at RA@... for details. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 5, 2004 Report Share Posted December 5, 2004 From: " Sev " <Sev@...> > Just trying to get something clarified, if you had a choice of > just 1 natural, edible thing to prevent cancer and not much time > during the day to prepare things, what would you take? a high-quality, soy-free green powder mix (w/organic ingredients) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 5, 2004 Report Share Posted December 5, 2004 Green Tea The preventative effects of green tea (Camellia sinensis) have also been demonstrated for several forms of cancer, including skin, stomach, duodenum, colon, liver, lung, prostate and pancreas. On the cardiovascular front, in test-tube studies green tea has suppressed oxidative damage to " bad " LDL cholesterol, the initial step in the buildup of plaque in the arteries, or atherosclerosis. Not surprisingly, a Japanese study of 1,371 men linked daily consumption of green tea to the prevention of heart disease. Sev <Sev@...> wrote: Hi all, Just trying to get something clarified, if you had a choice of just 1 natural, edible thing to prevent cancer and not much time during the day to prepare things, what would you take? Any thoughts appreciated. Sev. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2006 Report Share Posted November 23, 2006 Please send copy of The Holistic Dental Digest PLUS Bob Ray 312 Park St. Huron, Ohio 44839 Jerry Mittelman <jmittelman@...> wrote: Garlic and Onions lower cancer risk Italian researchers from the Institute of Pharmacology Research in Milan analyzed data from several Swiss and Italian cancer studies. They found that the more garlic or onions you consume the lower the risk of a number of cancers. The greater the consumption of onions the lower the risk of developing colorectal, laryngeal, and ovarian cancers. Those who ate the most onions also had a lower risk of cancer of the pharynx, oral cavity, and esophagus, prostate, and breasts. Higher intake of garlic was associated with a lower risk of colorectal and renal cell kidney cancer and cancer at all sites but not strongly for the breasts. The study is published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. - J. Hickey, RPh Reply with your name and street or po box address for your free copy of The Holistic Dental Digest PLUS, now in its 27th year and helping people on 5 continents. --What dentists aren't likely to learn in Dental School Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 5, 2008 Report Share Posted January 5, 2008 Cancer prevention: don't stress yourself JOE SCHWARCZ, Freelance Published: 6 hours ago Imagine you had the opportunity to have any question you can think of answered. But only one. What would it be? I've got a candidate: " How can cancer be prevented? " A pretty important question, given that roughly one in two or three of us (depending on whose statistics you believe) has to cope with the dread disease at some time in our lives. And I'm not only proposing a question. I also have an answer. Well, it isn't really my answer. It comes from the most extensive and exhaustive survey of the scientific literature on cancer prevention ever undertaken. . The World Cancer Research Fund and the American Institute for Cancer Research are both organizations with no commercial ties, dedicated to helping people make choices about reducing their chance of developing cancer. Their latest collaborative effort, Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity and the Prevention of Cancer is the result of years of work by experts from around the world, and represents a comprehensive review of thousands of publications. The report is like a phone book, but its essence can be summarized relatively easily. The main thrust was to examine the link between foods and specific cancers, ranking the associations from " convincing decreased risk " to " convincing increased risk, " with " probable decreased risk " and " probable increased risk " in- between. So, what was the conclusion about " convincing increased risk? " Red meat and processed meat clearly increase the risk of colorectal cancer. Arsenic in drinking water increases the risk of lung cancer, and alcoholic drinks increase the risks of cancers of the mouth, pharynx, larynx, colon and breast. Aflatoxins, found in mouldy grains, cause liver cancer. And body fatness increases the risk of oesophageal, pancreatic, colorectal, breast, endometrial and kidney cancers. " Probable increased risks " include salt consumption for stomach cancer, diets high in calcium for prostate cancer, alcoholic drinks for liver cancer and arsenic in water supplies for skin cancer. Now for " convincing decreased risk. " Pretty short list here. Breast feeding exclusively for six months decreases the risk of breast cancer. It also reduces the risk of obesity in children, which in turn reduces the risk of cancer. Physical activity decreases the risk of colorectal cancer. " Probable decreased risk " is more encompassing. Dietary fibre and garlic both decrease the risk of colorectal cancer and foods containing selenium or lycopene decrease the risk of prostate cancer. Milk decreases the risk of colorectal cancer and so do calcium supplements. Folate reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer. Fruit and non-starchy vegetable consumption decreases the risk of cancers of the mouth, oesophagus, stomach and lung. There were some surprises. Smoked or barbecued animal foods were seen to increase the risk of stomach cancer only slightly, and fat consumption only affected lung and breast cancer, and not with high significance. No evidence was found for vitamin supplements decreasing risk. After digesting the massive amount of data, the expert panel managed to distill the information down to eight recommendations. Here they are: 1. Being overweight increases the risk of many cancers. 2. Aim for 30 minutes of vigorous or 60 of moderate physical activity a day. 3. Consume " energy dense " foods that contain more than 225 calories per 100 grams sparingly. Aim for foods with less than 125 calories per 100 grams. This means very limited consumption of " fast foods " and sugary drinks. 4. Eat mostly foods of plant origin. Try for some unprocessed grains and or legumes at every meal. Eat at least five servings of fruits and non-starchy vegetables a day. Non-starchy vegetables include broccoli, carrots, green leafy vegetables and bok choy, but not potatoes. 5. Limit cooked red meat to less than 500 grams (18 oz) a week and avoid processed meats like hot dogs, hams, salamis and smoked meat. Ouch! 6. Avoid alcoholic drinks. The panel took into account the fact that modest alcohol consumption may protect against heart disease but found that as far as cancer is concerned, there is no level of consumption below which there is no increase in risk. It should be limited to two drinks a day for men and one for women. 7. Limit salt intake to less than 6 grams a day (corresponding to 2.4 grams of sodium). The best way to do this is to curb processed foods and fast foods. 8. Dietary supplements are not recommended for cancer prevention, but vitamin D, which holds the greatest hope, was not investigated. It should be added here that the panel did not consider the possible benefit of supplements for the prevention of other diseases and did not find any risks with supplements. There you have it. The culmination of a five-year-long process. On first glance, it may seem as if there is not much new here. But there is. This is the first time any expert group has made such specific recommendations about processed meats, soft drinks and alcoholic beverages. The advice is to avoid them. And what can we hope to achieve by adhering to these recommendations? The prevention of about 30 to 40 per cent of cancers! If we include giving up smoking, we're probably up to preventing 60 to 70 per cent of cases. What about the rest? Well, genes play a role and so do certain chemicals. There are about 100,000 chemicals used in commerce today, with very few having been thoroughly evaluated for cancer risk. We need to get a handle on which compounds found in our cleaning agents, fabrics, plastics, toys, cosmetics, electronic equipment or foods may contribute to human cancer. But for now, there is evidence to suggest foregoing beer and doing without pepperoni on the pizza while watching TV. And the survey found that television viewing was " probably " linked with weight gain. Now the good news. You don't have to give up coffee. There was no link to any kind of cancer. Finally, don't stress yourselves too much about all this; stress impairs the activity of the immune system and that increases the risk of cancer. Joe Schwarcz is director of McGill University's Office for Science and Society (www.OSS.McGill.ca). He can be heard every Sunday from 3-4 p.m. on CJAD. joe.schwarcz@... © The Gazette (Montreal) 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.