Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Testing Protocol

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hi

Congratulations on your good response to Gleevec!

I'm not sure what you mean by " your doctor is a cml specialist " as I

don't know of any specialists who wouldn't be doing PCR now. FISH has

a false negative which varies by lab anywhere from 1-10%. Do you know

what the false negative at your lab is? You might be FISH negative at

2.5%--many labs consider that a negative as it's not distinguishable

from a false positive. The recommendation at your stage of remission

is typically a PCR every 3 months. I would ask for a conversation

about this topic and maybe bring in a paper showing the monitoring

recommendations. If you want help putting your hands on that, let me

know.

Best wishes,

Dorothy

dx 5/2000

PCRU

On Dec 10, 2007, at 4:03 PM, silvermusic54022 wrote:

> Hello everyone. I have a general question/concern about the

> frequency and type of testing that I am receiving. I was diagnosed

> in April 07 and started Gleevec at 400mg. I reached CHR within one

> month. The first FISH test (early May) read 77%. In late July, a

> FISH test from a BMB revealed 14/200 or 7% testing positive for BCR

> ABL signal with no sign of mutations. So my response to Gleevec is

> good. A third FISH test (by blood) was done at the end of October

> and the results were 2.5% testing positive for BCR ABL. I received

> the results on Nov. 7.

>

> I feel very comfortable talking to my oncologist, who is a CML

> expert, but I have a few concerns after my last visit about " next

> steps. " He would like me to get a CBC done bi-monthly and repeat the

> BMB in April. No testing from now until then other than the CBCs.

> No mention of PCR testing outside of the initial test at diagnosis.

> I believe the logic from his standpoint is that there is no need to

> do PCR testing until I reach FISH =0%. I guess I'm just a little

> concerned about a 5 month gap in testing, even though I am having a

> good response to Gleevec. It's obvious to me that my Dr. is pleased

> with my progress, but 5-6 months seems like a pretty big span within

> a year of dx.

>

> Any thoughts would be appreciated.

>

> Chris

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi

Welcome to the club that nobody really wants to be a member of.

Your response has been outstanding. You have achieved CCR within 6 months

and it gets you a number in the Zero Club.

O!!! YIPPEEE!!!

Number 1136 in the Zero Club

Zavie

All the CML experts that I know insist on PCR monitoring right from the

onset. Certainly after you reach CCR.

A FISH of 2.5% is as good as Zero. All FISH testing overestimates the

BCR-ABL counts. Each lab has a value for theirown threshold. It is usually

around 5%.

All the experts will test for BCR-ABL every 3 months. Your doctor is doing

it at 6 months. This immediately raises a flag. I would insist on a PCR test

ASAP in order to establish a baseline value and then a PCR every 3 months

afterwards. If he/she doesn't agree to this, then I would start looking for

someone else to treat your CML.

Zavie

Zavie (age 69)

67 Shoreham Avenue

Ottawa, Canada, K2G 3X3

dxd AUG/99

INF OCT/99 to FEB/00, CHF

No meds FEB/00 to JAN/01

Gleevec since MAR/27/01 (400 mg)

CCR SEP/01. #102 in Zero Club

2.8 log reduction Sep/05

3.0 log reduction Jan/06

2.9 log reduction Feb/07

3.2 log reduction Jun/07

3.6 log reduction Sep/07

e-mail: zmiller@...

Tel: 613-726-1117

Fax: 309-296-0807

Cell: 613-202-0204

ID: zaviem

_____

From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of

silvermusic54022

Sent: December 10, 2007 4:04 PM

Subject: [ ] Testing Protocol

Hello everyone. I have a general question/concern about the

frequency and type of testing that I am receiving. I was diagnosed

in April 07 and started Gleevec at 400mg. I reached CHR within one

month. The first FISH test (early May) read 77%. In late July, a

FISH test from a BMB revealed 14/200 or 7% testing positive for BCR

ABL signal with no sign of mutations. So my response to Gleevec is

good. A third FISH test (by blood) was done at the end of October

and the results were 2.5% testing positive for BCR ABL. I received

the results on Nov. 7.

I feel very comfortable talking to my oncologist, who is a CML

expert, but I have a few concerns after my last visit about " next

steps. " He would like me to get a CBC done bi-monthly and repeat the

BMB in April. No testing from now until then other than the CBCs.

No mention of PCR testing outside of the initial test at diagnosis.

I believe the logic from his standpoint is that there is no need to

do PCR testing until I reach FISH =0%. I guess I'm just a little

concerned about a 5 month gap in testing, even though I am having a

good response to Gleevec. It's obvious to me that my Dr. is pleased

with my progress, but 5-6 months seems like a pretty big span within

a year of dx.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zavie and Dorothy,

Thanks for your quick response!! You have confirmed that I need to

have a talk with my Dr. Although he never used the term CCR, it is

reassuring to know that my percentage can be considered as good as

zero. As for club membership, I appreciate the encouragement!

>

> Hi

>

> Welcome to the club that nobody really wants to be a member of.

>

> Your response has been outstanding. You have achieved CCR within 6

months

> and it gets you a number in the Zero Club.

>

> O!!! YIPPEEE!!!

> Number 1136 in the Zero Club

> Zavie

>

> All the CML experts that I know insist on PCR monitoring right from

the

> onset. Certainly after you reach CCR.

>

> A FISH of 2.5% is as good as Zero. All FISH testing overestimates

the

> BCR-ABL counts. Each lab has a value for theirown threshold. It is

usually

> around 5%.

>

> All the experts will test for BCR-ABL every 3 months. Your doctor

is doing

> it at 6 months. This immediately raises a flag. I would insist on a

PCR test

> ASAP in order to establish a baseline value and then a PCR every 3

months

> afterwards. If he/she doesn't agree to this, then I would start

looking for

> someone else to treat your CML.

>

> Zavie

>

> Zavie (age 69)

> 67 Shoreham Avenue

> Ottawa, Canada, K2G 3X3

> dxd AUG/99

> INF OCT/99 to FEB/00, CHF

> No meds FEB/00 to JAN/01

> Gleevec since MAR/27/01 (400 mg)

> CCR SEP/01. #102 in Zero Club

> 2.8 log reduction Sep/05

> 3.0 log reduction Jan/06

> 2.9 log reduction Feb/07

> 3.2 log reduction Jun/07

> 3.6 log reduction Sep/07

> e-mail: zmiller@...

> Tel: 613-726-1117

> Fax: 309-296-0807

> Cell: 613-202-0204

> ID: zaviem

>

> _____

>

> From: [mailto: ] On Behalf

Of

> silvermusic54022

> Sent: December 10, 2007 4:04 PM

>

> Subject: [ ] Testing Protocol

>

> Hello everyone. I have a general question/concern about the

> frequency and type of testing that I am receiving. I was diagnosed

> in April 07 and started Gleevec at 400mg. I reached CHR within one

> month. The first FISH test (early May) read 77%. In late July, a

> FISH test from a BMB revealed 14/200 or 7% testing positive for BCR

> ABL signal with no sign of mutations. So my response to Gleevec is

> good. A third FISH test (by blood) was done at the end of October

> and the results were 2.5% testing positive for BCR ABL. I received

> the results on Nov. 7.

>

> I feel very comfortable talking to my oncologist, who is a CML

> expert, but I have a few concerns after my last visit about " next

> steps. " He would like me to get a CBC done bi-monthly and repeat

the

> BMB in April. No testing from now until then other than the CBCs.

> No mention of PCR testing outside of the initial test at diagnosis.

> I believe the logic from his standpoint is that there is no need to

> do PCR testing until I reach FISH =0%. I guess I'm just a little

> concerned about a 5 month gap in testing, even though I am having a

> good response to Gleevec. It's obvious to me that my Dr. is pleased

> with my progress, but 5-6 months seems like a pretty big span

within

> a year of dx.

>

> Any thoughts would be appreciated.

>

> Chris

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...