Guest guest Posted January 25, 2008 Report Share Posted January 25, 2008 That was an excellent post. Thank you for sharing your experience. In my mind, that is the best thing about this board, sharing our own hard learned lessons about CML, Oncology, Labs, Side Effects and everything that goes with it.. And for the record, I have had a very similar experience. With warm regards, Matt ville, FL DX January 2005 Gleevec March 2005 Tasigna November 2008 In a message dated 1/25/2008 11:44:47 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, lmartinez@... writes: Hi , I have to tell you hat happened to me last year. First - My oncologist has always used Genzyne Genetics. Great facility they have always had the best equipment in their facilities but obviously technology changes and at the end of 2006 they upgraded to the latest and greatest Now even though I had always had a 4 log reduction with them (First one done 60 days after starting gleevec 400mmgs) when I had my annual biopsy in March 2007, my PCR came back slightly higher. My Oncologist was pretty paranoid and I think it was due to the fact that I have done so well over the years he was scared that I may have started showing some resistance to Gleevec after the 5 years I had been on it. He immediately wanted to increase my gleevec, and I had explained to him that my theory is that they just implemented much more sensitive equipment in their facility so there is a strong possibility that it was always somewhere close to that very number but that the old equipment was not as sensitive. Because he wasn't aware of their upgrade he called and confirmed and he also spoke to the Head Oncologist at the Local Cancer Center here and everyone agreed with me that there is no reason to increase my gleevec as I still had a 4 log reduction regardless of the slight number increase. With that we agreed to watch for a trend and so far so good. What's funny is I also go to the local Cancer center here even though I have not been there in the past year and the lab that they use is always undetectable and so did Lab Corp. when we did my peripheral blood PCR test. We decided that they do not have very sensitive equipment and would stick with the Genzyne Genetics who appear to be one of if not the best in the country. I no longer waste my time with Lab Corp- I have my PCR blood test done at the hospital and it is mailed overnight to Genzyne so that we can use the same facilities. As for the local cancer center here I worry for the patients who use theirs as a baseline and follow it. I tell you this story because it is possible that the lab they were using may not have been as accurate as we assumed and I know we all wish for them to be standardized one day. This is your second PCR on Spyrcel and if it better than what you had obtained on Gleevec than please stay positive and maybe try to find out from your Doctor a little bit more about the changes the lab has made or what the difference is I the one they used to use and the new one. As for the nurse, I am sure you already know that some of them assume we are so ignorant. It can be pretty frustrating knowing that they are suppose to be medical professionals too, but I think we know more than them any day:-) I hope my story helps some- in the least please know that if it is correct that your PCR could have been higher before but not detected, isn't it great to know now as oppose to never knowing what's real. This will obviously Give you a clear picture of where you are now and where you want to be. I know it's scary to think that it could be getting worse but I bet that's not the case here. And consider all who are using Lab Corp and places that really don't have such good sensitive equipment. My prayers are with you and your worry. Stay strong and focus on the possible positives! ez [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] **************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp00300000002\ 5 48) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 2008 Report Share Posted January 25, 2008 Then darn it all, it is off to Ottawa for us all. It would be nice to get some good news now and again. With warm regards, Matt ville, FL DX January 2005 Gleevec March 2005 Tasigna November 2008 In a message dated 1/25/2008 1:11:57 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, zmiller@... writes: HI , Thank you for a great post. My experience exactly. If I would ever need a pick-me-up about my CML, all I have to do is have my PCR tested in Ottawa or Montreal and it will come back as PCRU. Zavie Zavie (age 69) 67 Shoreham Avenue Ottawa, Canada, K2G 3X3 dxd AUG/99 INF OCT/99 to FEB/00, CHF No meds FEB/00 to JAN/01 Gleevec since MAR/27/01 (400 mg) CCR SEP/01. #102 in Zero Club 2.8 log reduction Sep/05 3.0 log reduction Jan/06 2.9 log reduction Feb/07 3.2 log reduction Jun/07 3.6 log reduction Sep/07 e-mail: _zmiller@..._ (mailto:zmiller@...) Tel: 613-726-1117 Fax: 309-296-0807 Cell: 613-202-0204 ID: zaviem _____ From: _@..._ (mailto: ) [mailto:_@..._ (mailto: ) ] On Behalf Of ez Sent: January 25, 2008 11:37 AM _@..._ (mailto: ) Subject: [ ] Re:Question for all you professional PCR interpreters!Sub Help- long post sorry Hi , I have to tell you hat happened to me last year. First - My oncologist has always used Genzyne Genetics. Great facility they have always had the best equipment in their facilities but obviously technology changes and at the end of 2006 they upgraded to the latest and greatest Now even though I had always had a 4 log reduction with them (First one done 60 days after starting gleevec 400mmgs) when I had my annual biopsy in March 2007, my PCR came back slightly higher. My Oncologist was pretty paranoid and I think it was due to the fact that I have done so well over the years he was scared that I may have started showing some resistance to Gleevec after the 5 years I had been on it. He immediately wanted to increase my gleevec, and I had explained to him that my theory is that they just implemented much more sensitive equipment in their facility so there is a strong possibility that it was always somewhere close to that very number but that the old equipment was not as sensitive. Because he wasn't aware of their upgrade he called and confirmed and he also spoke to the Head Oncologist at the Local Cancer Center here and everyone agreed with me that there is no reason to increase my gleevec as I still had a 4 log reduction regardless of the slight number increase. With that we agreed to watch for a trend and so far so good. What's funny is I also go to the local Cancer center here even though I have not been there in the past year and the lab that they use is always undetectable and so did Lab Corp. when we did my peripheral blood PCR test. We decided that they do not have very sensitive equipment and would stick with the Genzyne Genetics who appear to be one of if not the best in the country. I no longer waste my time with Lab Corp- I have my PCR blood test done at the hospital and it is mailed overnight to Genzyne so that we can use the same facilities. As for the local cancer center here I worry for the patients who use theirs as a baseline and follow it. I tell you this story because it is possible that the lab they were using may not have been as accurate as we assumed and I know we all wish for them to be standardized one day. This is your second PCR on Spyrcel and if it better than what you had obtained on Gleevec than please stay positive and maybe try to find out from your Doctor a little bit more about the changes the lab has made or what the difference is I the one they used to use and the new one. As for the nurse, I am sure you already know that some of them assume we are so ignorant. It can be pretty frustrating knowing that they are suppose to be medical professionals too, but I think we know more than them any day:-) I hope my story helps some- in the least please know that if it is correct that your PCR could have been higher before but not detected, isn't it great to know now as oppose to never knowing what's real. This will obviously Give you a clear picture of where you are now and where you want to be. I know it's scary to think that it could be getting worse but I bet that's not the case here. And consider all who are using Lab Corp and places that really don't have such good sensitive equipment. My prayers are with you and your worry. Stay strong and focus on the possible positives! ez [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] **************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp00300000002\ 5 48) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 2008 Report Share Posted January 25, 2008 Hi Matt, Don't forget to bring your ice skates with you. Winterlude starts next week. One of the neat features of this city is a 7 km ice skating rink. The Rideau Canal runs through the city and it is groomed to provide an excellent skating facility. Zavie I've uploaded some photos. Check Winterlude in the Photo section of the website Zavie (age 69) 67 Shoreham Avenue Ottawa, Canada, K2G 3X3 dxd AUG/99 INF OCT/99 to FEB/00, CHF No meds FEB/00 to JAN/01 Gleevec since MAR/27/01 (400 mg) CCR SEP/01. #102 in Zero Club 2.8 log reduction Sep/05 3.0 log reduction Jan/06 2.9 log reduction Feb/07 3.2 log reduction Jun/07 3.6 log reduction Sep/07 e-mail: zmiller@... Tel: 613-726-1117 Fax: 309-296-0807 Cell: 613-202-0204 ID: zaviem _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of mtmaynor@... Sent: January 25, 2008 4:29 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Re:Question for all you professional PCR interpreters!!!! Help- ... Then darn it all, it is off to Ottawa for us all. It would be nice to get some good news now and again. With warm regards, Matt ville, FL DX January 2005 Gleevec March 2005 Tasigna November 2008 In a message dated 1/25/2008 1:11:57 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, zmillersympatico (DOT) <mailto:zmiller%40sympatico.ca> ca writes: HI , Thank you for a great post. My experience exactly. If I would ever need a pick-me-up about my CML, all I have to do is have my PCR tested in Ottawa or Montreal and it will come back as PCRU. Zavie Zavie (age 69) 67 Shoreham Avenue Ottawa, Canada, K2G 3X3 dxd AUG/99 INF OCT/99 to FEB/00, CHF No meds FEB/00 to JAN/01 Gleevec since MAR/27/01 (400 mg) CCR SEP/01. #102 in Zero Club 2.8 log reduction Sep/05 3.0 log reduction Jan/06 2.9 log reduction Feb/07 3.2 log reduction Jun/07 3.6 log reduction Sep/07 e-mail: _zmillersympatico (DOT) <mailto:_zmiller%40sympatico.zm> zm_ (mailto:zmillersympatico (DOT) <mailto:zmiller%40sympatico.ca> ca) Tel: 613-726-1117 Fax: 309-296-0807 Cell: 613-202-0204 ID: zaviem _____ From: _groups (DOT) <mailto:_%40groups.CML> CML_ (mailto:groups (DOT) <mailto:%40> com) [mailto:_groups (DOT) <mailto:_%40groups.CML> CML_ (mailto:groups (DOT) <mailto:%40> com) ] On Behalf Of ez Sent: January 25, 2008 11:37 AM _groups (DOT) <mailto:_%40groups.CML> CML_ (mailto:groups (DOT) <mailto:%40> com) Subject: [ ] Re:Question for all you professional PCR interpreters!Sub Help- long post sorry Hi , I have to tell you hat happened to me last year. First - My oncologist has always used Genzyne Genetics. Great facility they have always had the best equipment in their facilities but obviously technology changes and at the end of 2006 they upgraded to the latest and greatest Now even though I had always had a 4 log reduction with them (First one done 60 days after starting gleevec 400mmgs) when I had my annual biopsy in March 2007, my PCR came back slightly higher. My Oncologist was pretty paranoid and I think it was due to the fact that I have done so well over the years he was scared that I may have started showing some resistance to Gleevec after the 5 years I had been on it. He immediately wanted to increase my gleevec, and I had explained to him that my theory is that they just implemented much more sensitive equipment in their facility so there is a strong possibility that it was always somewhere close to that very number but that the old equipment was not as sensitive. Because he wasn't aware of their upgrade he called and confirmed and he also spoke to the Head Oncologist at the Local Cancer Center here and everyone agreed with me that there is no reason to increase my gleevec as I still had a 4 log reduction regardless of the slight number increase. With that we agreed to watch for a trend and so far so good. What's funny is I also go to the local Cancer center here even though I have not been there in the past year and the lab that they use is always undetectable and so did Lab Corp. when we did my peripheral blood PCR test. We decided that they do not have very sensitive equipment and would stick with the Genzyne Genetics who appear to be one of if not the best in the country. I no longer waste my time with Lab Corp- I have my PCR blood test done at the hospital and it is mailed overnight to Genzyne so that we can use the same facilities. As for the local cancer center here I worry for the patients who use theirs as a baseline and follow it. I tell you this story because it is possible that the lab they were using may not have been as accurate as we assumed and I know we all wish for them to be standardized one day. This is your second PCR on Spyrcel and if it better than what you had obtained on Gleevec than please stay positive and maybe try to find out from your Doctor a little bit more about the changes the lab has made or what the difference is I the one they used to use and the new one. As for the nurse, I am sure you already know that some of them assume we are so ignorant. It can be pretty frustrating knowing that they are suppose to be medical professionals too, but I think we know more than them any day:-) I hope my story helps some- in the least please know that if it is correct that your PCR could have been higher before but not detected, isn't it great to know now as oppose to never knowing what's real. This will obviously Give you a clear picture of where you are now and where you want to be. I know it's scary to think that it could be getting worse but I bet that's not the case here. And consider all who are using Lab Corp and places that really don't have such good sensitive equipment. My prayers are with you and your worry. Stay strong and focus on the possible positives! ez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 25, 2008 Report Share Posted January 25, 2008 Me too!!!! I wish we had a place like that here is Calif. I hear Canada has great health care. Or so I was told in the movie " Sicko " anyonw watch that??? Sharon T _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of mtmaynor@... Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 1:29 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Re:Question for all you professional PCR interpreters!!!! Help- ... Then darn it all, it is off to Ottawa for us all. It would be nice to get some good news now and again. With warm regards, Matt ville, FL DX January 2005 Gleevec March 2005 Tasigna November 2008 In a message dated 1/25/2008 1:11:57 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, zmillersympatico (DOT) <mailto:zmiller%40sympatico.ca> ca writes: HI , Thank you for a great post. My experience exactly. If I would ever need a pick-me-up about my CML, all I have to do is have my PCR tested in Ottawa or Montreal and it will come back as PCRU. Zavie Zavie (age 69) 67 Shoreham Avenue Ottawa, Canada, K2G 3X3 dxd AUG/99 INF OCT/99 to FEB/00, CHF No meds FEB/00 to JAN/01 Gleevec since MAR/27/01 (400 mg) CCR SEP/01. #102 in Zero Club 2.8 log reduction Sep/05 3.0 log reduction Jan/06 2.9 log reduction Feb/07 3.2 log reduction Jun/07 3.6 log reduction Sep/07 e-mail: _zmillersympatico (DOT) <mailto:_zmiller%40sympatico.zm> zm_ (mailto:zmillersympatico (DOT) <mailto:zmiller%40sympatico.ca> ca) Tel: 613-726-1117 Fax: 309-296-0807 Cell: 613-202-0204 ID: zaviem _____ From: _groups (DOT) <mailto:_%40groups.CML> CML_ (mailto:groups (DOT) <mailto:%40> com) [mailto:_groups (DOT) <mailto:_%40groups.CML> CML_ (mailto:groups (DOT) <mailto:%40> com) ] On Behalf Of ez Sent: January 25, 2008 11:37 AM _groups (DOT) <mailto:_%40groups.CML> CML_ (mailto:groups (DOT) <mailto:%40> com) Subject: [ ] Re:Question for all you professional PCR interpreters!Sub Help- long post sorry Hi , I have to tell you hat happened to me last year. First - My oncologist has always used Genzyne Genetics. Great facility they have always had the best equipment in their facilities but obviously technology changes and at the end of 2006 they upgraded to the latest and greatest Now even though I had always had a 4 log reduction with them (First one done 60 days after starting gleevec 400mmgs) when I had my annual biopsy in March 2007, my PCR came back slightly higher. My Oncologist was pretty paranoid and I think it was due to the fact that I have done so well over the years he was scared that I may have started showing some resistance to Gleevec after the 5 years I had been on it. He immediately wanted to increase my gleevec, and I had explained to him that my theory is that they just implemented much more sensitive equipment in their facility so there is a strong possibility that it was always somewhere close to that very number but that the old equipment was not as sensitive. Because he wasn't aware of their upgrade he called and confirmed and he also spoke to the Head Oncologist at the Local Cancer Center here and everyone agreed with me that there is no reason to increase my gleevec as I still had a 4 log reduction regardless of the slight number increase. With that we agreed to watch for a trend and so far so good. What's funny is I also go to the local Cancer center here even though I have not been there in the past year and the lab that they use is always undetectable and so did Lab Corp. when we did my peripheral blood PCR test. We decided that they do not have very sensitive equipment and would stick with the Genzyne Genetics who appear to be one of if not the best in the country. I no longer waste my time with Lab Corp- I have my PCR blood test done at the hospital and it is mailed overnight to Genzyne so that we can use the same facilities. As for the local cancer center here I worry for the patients who use theirs as a baseline and follow it. I tell you this story because it is possible that the lab they were using may not have been as accurate as we assumed and I know we all wish for them to be standardized one day. This is your second PCR on Spyrcel and if it better than what you had obtained on Gleevec than please stay positive and maybe try to find out from your Doctor a little bit more about the changes the lab has made or what the difference is I the one they used to use and the new one. As for the nurse, I am sure you already know that some of them assume we are so ignorant. It can be pretty frustrating knowing that they are suppose to be medical professionals too, but I think we know more than them any day:-) I hope my story helps some- in the least please know that if it is correct that your PCR could have been higher before but not detected, isn't it great to know now as oppose to never knowing what's real. This will obviously Give you a clear picture of where you are now and where you want to be. I know it's scary to think that it could be getting worse but I bet that's not the case here. And consider all who are using Lab Corp and places that really don't have such good sensitive equipment. My prayers are with you and your worry. Stay strong and focus on the possible positives! ez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.