Guest guest Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 Gleevec May Disrupt Ovarian Function By Serena Gordon HealthDay Reporter Wednesday, March 5, 2008; 12:00 AM WEDNESDAY, March 5 (HealthDay News) -- Although it's a much more targeted treatment than standard chemotherapy, the effective and much-touted leukemia drug, Gleevec, isn't without side effects. In women still in their reproductive years, imatinib (Gleevec) might damage the chances of having a baby in the future, according to a case report published as a letter in the March 6 issue of theNew England Journal of Medicine. " Although the odds are not known, it is possible that imatinib and drugs with a similar mode of action may impair fertility, " said one of the letter's authors, Dr. Constantinos Christopoulos, deputy director of the 1st department of internal medicine at Amalia Fleming General Hospital in Athens, Greece. " It is not known whether imatinib-induced infertility is reversible. " However, Christopoulos was also quick to point out that this was only a single case report of premature ovarian failure, and it can be difficult to establish the exact cause of the condition. " Imatinib is a very effective drug that has revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), but knowledge of the effects of its long-term administration is still limited, and close medical surveillance of patients receiving the drug is mandatory, " he said. The patient Christopoulos and his colleagues reported on was a 28-year-old female who had Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML. Each year in the United States, just under 5,000 people are diagnosed with this type of cancer, according to the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. She was initially given 400 milligrams of Gleevec daily. About one year into her treatment, the dose of Gleevec was increased to 600 milligrams per day, because she still had some cancer cells. She didn't have any severe side effects due to the treatment, though she experienced some skin discoloration and muscle cramping. During the first two years, she also reported having regular menstrual cycles. About two years after she first started taking Gleevec, and about six months after the dose was increased, the woman reported that she was having irregular menstrual cycles and then her periods ceased altogether. Doctors confirmed premature ovarian failure. While it's not possible to definitively prove that Gleevec caused premature menopause, Christopoulos said that based on the timing, the lack of other causes, and the drugs' mode of action, it's the most likely culprit. Gleevec works by targeting tyrosine kinases, which are proteins that are very active in cancer cells. However, these proteins are also expressed by the ovaries. " There are about 60 tyrosine kinases. Can Gleevec be so specific that it only interacts with one of the 60? This drug is pretty good at targeting and hitting the bull's-eye, but it's not perfect, " said Dr. Bart Kamen, chief medical officer of the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. " Is it worth that risk? You better believe it, " Kamen said. " The side effects of Gleevec compared to what else we do in cancer treatment is mild. It has a wonderful risk-to-benefit ratio. " " The advantages of this drugclearlyoutweigh the disadvantages, " said Dr. Jay , chairman of hematology/oncology at Ochsner Health System in Baton Rouge, La. also pointed out that most women with CML are long past their reproductive years. According to the American Cancer Society, the average age of CML diagnosis is about 67. While most women are already counseled about the risks to their fertility before undergoing any cancer treatment, Christopoulos said that women of reproductive age receiving Gleevec should know that they shouldn't become pregnant while taking the drug, and they may want to freeze some of their eggs before treatment. More information The American Cancer Society has more on Gleevec Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2008 Report Share Posted March 28, 2008 There are a lot more women having difficulties than reported. I am curious as to who they are monitoring because it's not me or any of the others I have known on the list and other list over the years. I agree the benefits outweigh the risk but I believe that Gleevec is the culprit of inducing menopause on us women who are much younger than 67. Obviously and hopefully those women are far beyond menopause. Menopause can be a serious issue and I think they need to be a bit more interested. I also feel there is cause for concern regarding cervical cancer in us women who are having these hormone issues and premature menopause. If there were research now, that may be prevented. It's about time we seen an article on this issue, but one woman? We here know different. Sorry if I sound so negative about this situation but no one will listen to me but the women here in the group. ez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.