How To Legally Avoid Unwanted Immunizations Of All Kinds

[Guest guest]

I found this on the internet, but the

sites kept disappearing so I saved it to my hard drive. Hopefully, it will

help someone else.

Sharyn

How To

Legally Avoid Unwanted Immunizations Of All Kinds

As you

read this work, and put its principles into practice, there are two basic

axioms you never want to forget, because they are the rock upon which all your

actions are based.

1. No

one, nowhere, no time, and under no circumstances has the right or power in

this country to immunize you or your children against your will and conviction.

If they attempt to do so, you can legally charge them with " assault with a

deadly weapon " and have the full resources of our laws behind you.

2. At all

times in attempting to avoid unwanted immunization, you have the Law of the

Land behind you. Those who would try to vaccinate you against your will are on

very shaky ground. Into every compulsory immunization law in America are

written legal exceptions and waivers which are there specifically to protect

you from the attempted tyranny of officialdom. It is not only your right, but

your obligation to use them, if this is what your conscience tells you.

Article I

In all your contacts with any member of the school, public health, or legal

establishment, always remain calm, courteous, and humbly reverent toward their

position. You are only asking of them that which the law duty binds them to

give you. There is no reason, or advantage to be gained, by antagonizing them.

Most of these officials believe they are discharging their trust as outlined by

law. If they are overstepping the law, then you must very diplomatically bring

the true facts to their attention, but without attempting to belittle them. The

more you can preserve their ego, the more easily and quickly you are likely to

get what you desire - a waiver of immunization.

Rule No.

1: Do not harass, belittle, or antagonize officials unnecessarily.

Article 2

All compulsory laws concerning vaccination (including the military) contain

exceptions and waivers. It is these protections placed in the laws that you may

legally use to exclude yourself and your children. Surprisingly, these

exceptions were placed there, not for your sake (although you may take

advantage of them), but for the protection of the establishment. How is this?

Let us assume that these exceptions were not there and everyone was actually

forced to be immunized. Should a child die or become mentally or physically

disabled, the parent would have the perfect case to sue the doctor, the school,

the health department, and even the state legislature for enormous damages.

Since they allowed no exceptions, they must accept full responsibility for all

the adverse consequences of thelaw. However, if exception waivers are placed in

the law, the responsibility is then transferred back to the parent. If a child

should be injured by immunization, the officials can say, " Well, the

parent should have exempted him if they thought there was any danger. "

Therefore,

there is in truth no such thing as a compulsory vaccination law in this

country. They are ALL, in essence, voluntary. The problem is that practically

no one in authority will let you know this fact.

Rule No.

2: There are no compulsory vaccination laws. All are voluntary, and you are

held responsible for the adverse results upon you or your children.

Article 3

While all immunization laws have exceptions you can use, the wording in each

state differs, and you must know the exact wording for your state to make the

proper request of waiver. This information can be obtained in one of two ways.

1. Go to

the reference section of your local library- look in the State Statute Revised

Law Book under Public Health Law or Communicable Disease sections. The list of

immunization requirements will appear first and then the exemptions will be

given. Usually one or two provisions will be listed, either on religious or

medical grounds or both.

2. You

may call or write your state representative and ask for a copy of the

immunization law in your state. Making this available is part of his job, and

it will be sent promptly.

Rule No.

3: Know your own state law so that you can conform to its exact requirements

for exemption.

Article 4

There are two basic reasons for exception - medical or religious. Which one you

choose will often depend upon the wording of the law in your state and your

personal convictions. We shall discuss medical exemption first. While laws do

vary, nearly all states require that a note or certificate of waiver be

submitted by a physician licensed in the state of residence. In some areas

where states are small and people continually travel from one to another for

business, a statement from a physician in a contiguous state will be accepted.

In this

letter it is usually necessary to state the reason for the requested waiver and

the length of time it should extend. Many laws limit all such letters to a

school year and they must be renewed each fall. The two most valid reasons for

medical waiver are " the fear of allergic reaction in a sensitive

child " and " to prevent possible damage to a weakened immune

system. " Both of these can occur in a child who has been immunized, and

since no one but the physician and the parent will be held responsible for

their consequences, it is up to them to protect the child.

It is

possible that some states may require the letter from an M.D. or D.O., but many

will allow an exemption letter from a chiropractor if it is courteously and properly

written, as outlined above.

Rule No.

4: Medical waivers are always valid but must be written to fit each state law

and often need to be renewed annually.

Article 5

Most people will be best served by a religious exemption unless the state law

is so restrictive as to make this nearly impossible to obtain. The only church

that is legally opposed to vaccination is the Christian Science Church. They

took the matter to the courts and obtained a legal ruling of exemption. It is

because of this that state laws recognize the religious exemption.

Another

church, The Church of Illumination is also by its tenets opposed to

immunization for its adherents, and they are encouraged to go to jail if

necessary before submitting to this procedure. Since it is a " Church at

Large, " they are able to enroll members throughout the entire United

States and would be pleased to consider any applicant who is without present

church affiliation and who desires the legitimate support of others in his

convictions.

In some

states an official letter from a church authority is required before exemption

will be given; in others, it is only necessary to submit a notarized letter

that you ADHERE to religious tenets which hold vaccination against God's laws.

All officialdom becomes a little shaky when you mention religious freedom, as

it is one of our basic American rights and no one wants to be made the

" heavy " in denying anyone religious freedom.

The

general desire of most health officials is to exert as much control as

possible, while assuming as little responsibility as possible. If you place

them in a position in which they must either give you a waiver or assume

additional responsibility, you will usually get your waiver.

Rule No.

5: Waivers can usually be obtained by a letter from a church official

certifying that you are a member of a church that recommends against

immunizations for its adherents. Many states will also allow exemption on

religious grounds if you send them a notarized letter stating that you ADHERE

to the beliefs of such a church, even if you are not an official member.

Article 6

The foregoing may work for school exemptions, but are there any such waivers in

the Armed Forces? Yes, all branches of the Service provide " immunization

waivers. " Again, if they did not, you could sue them for millions of

dollars if a reaction occurred from their immunizations. Because of these

waiver provisions you become responsible if you react.

When you

first sign up or enlist, you must state your objection to the vaccinations and

tell whether it is " religious conscience " or medical reasons, such as

allergies or a low tolerance to medication of any kind. If you do not show

objection at this time, you have given the military the right to do what they

will with you. If there is any difficulty, the same rules apply here as in the

school program. Never forget, even though you may be in the Service, no one has

the right to immunize you against your will. You do not give up your

constitutional rights when you join the Armed Forces.

Rule No.

6: The rules that govern school vaccination exemption also apply to the

military. Never let anyone tell you otherwise. They do not know, or are hiding

the facts of the law.

Article 7

What

about international travel? May I go around the world without vaccination?

The World

Health Organization (WHO) in Geneva

grants American visitors the right to REFUSE shots when traveling

internationally. However, if an area you wish to enter is infected, you may be

detained until the public health servant gives you the " go " (at his

discretion). Thousands travel world-wide each year without shots - so may you

if that is your choice. Many of our co-workers have travel led over much of the

world and have never taken any immunizations, nor were they ever detained.

It would

be wise to request a copy of Foreign Rules and Regulations, Part 71, Title 42,

on immunization when you receive your passport. Never forget the basic rule,

however, " No one will vaccinate you against your will because by doing so

they assume full responsibility for the consequences both legal and

medical. "

Rule No.

7: You may travel wherever you wish in the world without vaccination. The worst

that can happen is that in very rare circumstances you may be detained

temporarily.

Some

Important Details

The above seven articles constitute all the basic rules. However, there are

many important little " tricks of the trade " to having your legal

requests honored. These will now be discussed.

While

waivers and exemptions are written into all laws on immunization, most public

health officials, doctors, and especially school officials are loathe to

discuss their existence when questioned, and rarely, to our knowledge,

volunteer such information. A top Philadelphia

school official was on the radio with the unequivocal statement, " NO

SHOTS, NO SCHOOL. " This statement is of course completely counter to state

law, with which presumably he is familiar. Such unwarranted dogmatism is common

in the people you will encounter. Once the end of their legitimate authority

has been reached, they will use their next most powerful weapon - INTIMIDATION.

They will threaten to keep your child out of school, take him from you, or send

you to jail. These are all idle threats because they can do none of these

things, if you follow our simple instructions. The basic rules have been given

to you, but there are a few important details to be considered if the officials

start on this course of unlawful intimidation.

1. You

must send a letter to the school to inform the education officials of your

stand. A phone call is not legal. It can be a note from your doctor, minister,

or a notarized letter from you stating your sincere objections to the

immunization. If you do not do this and fail to have your child immunized, it

could be construed as negligence on your part and in some states there is a

possibility of legal action against you.

2. If the

school should refuse to honor your letter, request that they give you a

statement in writing outlining their reasons for refusal. If they won't, their

refusal is legally invalid, and your letter stands; they must enroll your

child. If they do (they rarely will), they take the risk of incriminating

themselves, especially if they are acting contrary (as is common) to what is

specified in the law concerning your rights for exemption. Remember they are on

tenuous ground, not you. They are your servants, not you theirs.

If worst

comes to worst and you have a very knowledgeable official who writes you a

refusal and states accurately the lawful reasons for refusal, he will also in a

negative way tell you what the accepted exemptions are, and then you can go

about meeting them, by one of the routes suggested in this handout.

3. Child

neglect is the one legal point you want to avoid at all costs. No legal parent

or guardian can be charged with neglect unless he shows complete lack of

concern or action to be more informed. Stripped of legal jargon, this simply

means that if you can show that you have investigated the situation, have come

to a specific decision concerning immunizations, and have informed the

authorities of the same, no neglect charge can be brought. Neglect can be

brought only when it can be shown that you have failed to have your children

immunized, not out of respect for their medical or spiritual integrity, but

only because you were too concerned with other matters.

4. At

times there may be a question of whether you have given or withdrawn legal

consent. Legal consent is dependent upon being properly informed on both the

advantages and the risks in any choice or decision you make. In other words, if

a physician were to tell you that vaccination is perfectly safe and effective

to obtain your consent, such consent would not be legal because he lied and you

have not been properly informed. Conversely, it could be argued that nonconsent

is not legal if you are not fully informed about the risks and advantages of

immunizations.

5. What

do I do if everyone refuses to give me a waiver?

This

would be an extremely rare circumstance, but should it happen, you are not left

without resources. Here is where we pull out one of our big guns. Send

notarized letters by certified mail to the vaccine laboratory which makes the

shot (ask your doctor for the address), the doctor who is to administer the

shot, your school principal, the school board, and your local health

department. In these letters make it clear that, since they have refused to

give you a duly requested waiver, you can no longer be held responsible for

what may happen to your child, if they force these shots upon him. You then

state that you will allow immunization if each will present you with a written

signed guarantee of safety and effectiveness of the vaccine and that they will

consent to assume full responsibility for any and all adverse reactions that your

child may develop from the required shots. Of course none will give you such a

guarantee. They cannot do so because all vaccines are considered potentially

highly toxic. We have yet to hear of an instance of further harassment of

parents after such letters have been sent.

That's

about all that is needed to obtain the necessary exemptions for your children.

All that has been said in this last section (1 to 5) is also applicable to the

military and international travel, if required.

Potpourri

of Ammunition

There were several good tips in Mrs. Girdwain's original manuscript which were

not included in the body of this thesis, but are too good to omit, and so we

have placed them here for your perusal.

" As

long as each individual who opposes vaccines has sincere Objections, states

them in writing, and signs his name - it is considered legal and proper action

and must therefore be honored. "

" Since

many medical controversies exist surrounding immunization, drugs, and various

other medications, it mandates that each individual have the right to control

his own decisions and freedom of choice; anything less would be contrary to the

constitutional laws that protect the citizens' rights. "

" When

you deal with school officials and lawyers, you are playing with legal terminology

- move the wrong words around and you get hung. " The terminology used in

this booklet has worked before and should again.

" It

is important to state your objections in such a way that it complies with your

state's exemption provisions. They must then accept your request; if they do

not, they are breaking their own law. " That is why it is absolutely

essential that you know your own state law word for word before submitting your

objection.

" According

to CDC (the federal Communicable Disease Center in Atlanta, Georgia),

physicians are required to first inform their patients of the risks involved

before they consent to vaccines. " If they do not do so, it is prima facie

evidence of deceit or negligence on the part of the physician. This regulation

by the federal government would also seem to assume that the patient has the

right to refuse if he feels that the risks are too great. If this is so, is not

the federal government on record as supporting voluntary immunization and, by

obvious implication, against state-enforced compulsory immunization?

Should

you ever have to go to court, or what is more likely, to appear before a

" kangaroo " court of school and health department officials, here is

some class A evidence you might find useful to mention.

No vaccine carries any guarantee of protection

from the laboratory that produced it or the doctor who administered it.

The U.S. military allows

no-nonsense " immunizations waivers. "

There is NO FEDERAL LAW on immunizations. They

don't dare. Their lawyers know the consequences.

Your rights have been infringed upon by officials

attempting to use force against your will.

Most

state officials like a nice unstressful job. When you send in your objections

and refuse to fit their ordered world by not having your children immunized,

you make waves. This rocks their quiet existence, and there are only two ways

their life can become orderly again either by forcing you to their will or

acquiescing to yours. What you must do to obtain an early waiver is to make the

latter the easiest path for them.

At first,

however, an attempt will usually be made to bend you to their will by some form

of intimidation. Many uninformed parents give in to this tack, and so it is

tried again and again. If you are adequately informed, as a reader of this

publication should be, you will let the officials know in no uncertain terms

that you understand your rights under the law and will not stand for any such

shilly-shallying. Invariably, once they discover you are adamant and acquainted

with the state law, your waiver will be rapidly forthcoming.

A Final

Word

While the situation we are discussing here can be a matter of life and death,

you never want to lose your sense of humor. Let the opposition huff and puff;

you hold all the trump cards. If you observe the few simple suggestions made

here, the law is all on your side. You are the good guys; they the villains.

You wear the white hats; they, the black. Even in late 20th century America the

just will triumph under the law. They have only trickery, lies, and

intimidation; justice, truth, and honor lie entirely with you. So have fun and

bless God every day for placing you under the Free American System.

American

Medical News

August 14, 1995 pages 32-34

Short

time from DPT to death doesn't prove link.

Parents

of an infant who died within hours of receiving a DPT vaccination failed to

prove her death was caused by a reaction to an endotoxin in the vaccine, a

federal appellate court ruled. The parents of a healthy baby born Dec. 2, 1982,

brought her in for her first diptheria-pertussis-tetanus shot on Feb. 23, 1983.

Shortly after returning home, the infant had two screaming and crying episodes.

The mother put her in her crib to cry herself to sleep; when she checked 30 to

45 minutes later, the baby was limp, pale, unresponsive and not breathing. She

was taken to the hospital by ambulance, but could not be revived. An autopsy

listed sudden infant death syndrome as the cause of death.

The

parents petitioned for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury

Act; the trial court denied their petition. On appeal, the parents argued the

fact the child had been found found unresponsive and in cardiac and pulmonary

arrest was clear evidence of hypotonic- hyporesponsive collapse from an

endotoxin in the vaccine. HHC is compensable under the act.

The court

said the parents must present a medical theory causally connecting the

vaccination with the child's cardiac and pulmonary arrest. Evidence in the

record failed to support the parent's theory that death was caused by a

reaction to endotoxin in the vaccine. The court concluded that a causal link

between the vaccination and death could not be based merely on the short time

between the events.

Hodges v.

Secretary of Dept. of HHS, 9F.3d 958 (C.A. Fed. Cir., Nov. 15, 1993)

SIDS

doesn't prove DPT vaccine-injury claim.

The

parents of a child who allegedly died as a result of a vaccination were not

entitled to ompensation, ruled a federal appellate court. The child was born by

routine C-Section in December 1983. Starting in her second month of life, she

was given phenobarbital for colic. In her fourth month, she received a DPT

vaccination and, the same day, a few hours later, a dose of phenobarbital. She

awoke two hours later, at 9:30 p.m., and took some but not all of her bottle

and cereal. The next morning between 6 and 6:30 she was found dead in her crib.

An autopsy later classified her death as sudden infant death syndrome.

The

parents sought compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Act.

In their action filed in the federal claims court, they asserted the child died

from either anaphylactic shock or hypotonic-hyporesponsive collapse, both

compensable under the program. In the alternative, the parents claimed the

child had died from some other injury caused by the DTP vaccination.

The

special master assigned to the case determined that neither cause was

responsible for the death. He concluded the parents had failed to establish by

a preponderance of evidence the vaccination was the cause of death. Reversing

this decision, the claims court held that the undisputed evidence of

respiratory or cardiovascular failure required a determination that HHC was

present. As the precise cause of death was unknown, it wasnecessary to accept

as a matter of law that symptoms of HHC, including respiratory and cardiac

arrest, constituted the presence of HHC.

On

appeal, court reversed. The claims court had made two errors, it explained. The

first was in ignoring the plain language of the Vaccine Act, which required

establishment of cause of death by a preponderance of the evidence. The second

was in failing to recognize that nothing in the act supported the conclusion

that when cause of death was unknown, the presence of symptoms such as

cardiovascular or respiratory arrest superseded the requirement of a

preponderance of evidence.

Hellebrand

v. Secretary of Dept. of HHS, 999 E2d 1565 (C.A., Fed. Cir., July 23, 1993)

These

articles are an amazing demonstration that the federal government does not

belive DPT can kill your baby even if death occurs within hours of receiving a

vaccine shot!!!

An

Acknowledgment

The greatest part of the material on the first four pages is taken from the

work of Mrs. Grace Girdwain, of Burbank,

Illinois. Our staff has

rearranged and edited the information, but we wish the full credit for its

existence to go to this courageous woman who has for twelve years worked

arduously, without compensation, to help her fellow Americans obtain their

legal rights.

Illinois

Administrative Code Title 77: Public Health Chapter I: Department of Public

Health Subchapter i: Maternal and Child Health Part 665 Child Health

Examination Code Subpart E: Exceptions

Section

665.510 Objection of Parent or Legal Guardian

Parent or

legal guardian of a student may object to health examinations, immunizations,

vision, and hearing screening tests, and dental health examinations for their

children on religious grounds. If a religious objection is made, a written and

signed statement from the parent or legal guardian detailing such objections

must be presented to the local school authority. General philosophical or moral

reluctance to allow physical examinations, immunizations, vision and hearing

screening, and dental examinations will not provide a sufficient basis for an

exception to statutory requirements. The parent or legal guardian must be

informed by the local school authority of measles outbreak control exclusion

procedures per IDPH rules. The Control of Communicable Diseases (77 Ill. Adm. Code 690) at

the time such objection is presented.

Section

665.520 Medical Objections

a) Any

medical objections to an immunization must be:

1) Made by a physician licensed to practice medicine in all its branches indicating

what the medical condition is.

2) Endorsed and signed by the physician on the certificate of child health

examination and placed on file in the child's permanent record.

Should

the condition of the child later permit immunization, this requirement will

then have to be met. Parents or legal guardians must be informed of measles

outbreak control exclusion procedures when such objection is presented per

Section 665.510.