Guest guest Posted September 8, 1999 Report Share Posted September 8, 1999 Hi Theresa, Complete copies of the IDEA may be found at a number of sites. My favorite site for IDEA information is http://www.idonline.org . I find it incredible that the department that she is working for would not have a copy of the backbone legislation for advocating in the interest of children with any kind of disability in an educational environment. Take care. Louis -owneronelist louisharkins_4@... /subscribe/ and /subscribe/ocdandhomeschooling ----Original Message Follows---- From: " Theresa " <pudding@...> Reply-onelist <onelist> Subject: idea Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 17:23:50 -0400 Hi list Does anyone on this list know where we can find a complete copy of the IDEA law on the Internet?My daughter needs this information before she goes to work in the morning.She wants to be sure of what it says before she goes to a meeting at the middle school concerning one of her clients.She works for the Dept. of Disabilities and Special Needs.Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks Theresa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 1999 Report Share Posted September 9, 1999 Hi Theresa, Your daughter has my deep admiration for trying to make the system work. Far too often it seems that the agencies which should be advocating for our children are bogged down in red tape and politics. I hope all goes well tomorrow for both your daughter and the child she is trying to help. Please keep us posted. Take care. Louis -owneronelist louisharkins_4@... /subscribe/ and /subscribe/ocdandhomeschooling ----Original Message Follows---- From: " Theresa " <pudding@...> Reply-onelist <onelist> Subject: idea Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 23:52:03 -0400 Thanks everyone for all the information.We found the bill in its entirety on a website.My daughter is having a hard time with the school personnel where this child is supposedly receiving services and she is trying to make sure that she has all the facts before she goes to a meeting tomorrow.She asked for information last week from the head of the Special Services Division and there was quite an uproar,so she is trying to get this information on her own.This may possibly end up as a court case and everyone here knows everyone else.We have a buddy-buddy situation,unfortunately for the child.(This child is autistic with some ocd traits)I could write a book on everything that is going on,but that is why she couldn't get the information from her office or the school. Thanks again for the help. Theresa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 1999 Report Share Posted September 9, 1999 >From: " Louis Harkins " <louisharkins_4@...> >>Far too often it seems that the agencies which should be advocating >for our children are bogged down in red tape and politics. I'll second that Louis!! I am having such a block at work and accessing services for my kids. The red tape is often not in the best interest of the people concerned. Tom is a great example - with us giving up costudy in order to access service. take care, wendy in canada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 1999 Report Share Posted September 10, 1999 Kudos to your daughter for taking the challenge. Tell her to keep it up. Terry in WI idea Hi This is an update on my daughter's continued efforts on behalf of one of the children her agency serves.There have been two meetings since this began.The child was suspended from school because he was on the floor and might be a hazard to the other children.(He is a big child and this is a middle school)The assistant principle decided this.Yesterday-Thursday-the assistant principle was told by the lead psychologist that he was not going to suspend this child again because the child had no idea of what suspension meant.All he knew was that he didn't go to school.My daughter confronted the special ed teacher(he's new to this school) and told him if he wasn't going to implement the teaching strategies that her agency,the autism advocate,and the speech therapist had made available to him,that this child was going to lose every skill he had gained.The teacher said he was willing to do this.Well,he hasn't even read any of the material.There was another meeting today with the two assistant principles and the same one said they were wasting their time and this child was just a bad seed.This is getting to be too long.I'm going to try to condense and you will have to use your imaginations or experience in dealing with school personnel.My daughter,the autism adv.,and the speech teacher are setting up the spec.ed.teacher's room into stations.The assistant principle is saying the child needs to go on homebound inst.My daughter said were they willing to provide an all day teacher to go to this child's house because anything else was unacceptable, and he didn't answer.There is a lot more going on and all of the assistant principal's comments are being documented. says the child is not bad,he's just bored and acting out because he isn't being stimulated. There was no transition period,even though his teacher from last year offered to do it.It's a real mess,but hopefully the school will realize they have to co-operate or it may become a federal case.There are more people coming in on Monday to assess the situation. Okay,this is enough about this. There is so much going on about this,that it would take me all night to tell you. Sorry Theresa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 1999 Report Share Posted September 11, 1999 Hi Theresa, Thanks for the update. I think that many of us have experienced our own version of this situation. I know that I would have appreciated an advocate like your daughter when we were struggling with our older son's school staff whose sole goal was to deny him grade level instruction in an environment that he could tolerate. Take care. Louis -owneronelist louisharkins_4@... /subscribe/ and /subscribe/ocdandhomeschooling Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2001 Report Share Posted November 20, 2001 I am urging everyone to complete the e-mail form at http://www.specialkidsla.com/ideareauthorization.htm. -if you feel it is working and you like it the way it is, please tell them. -if your child has been helped by IDEA, please thank them. -if you have suggestions on how it could be improved, please give them your ideas. -if you feel it is burdensome, please let them know. Our children's right to a free, appropriate, public education is governed by this law. Parent participation in the IEP process was strengthened in the 1997 reauthorization, as was access to the general curriculum. What will the 2002 reauthorization include? Education Secretary Rod Paige is in favor of more funding for IDEA, but first he feels it must be fixed. Researchers at Harvard have testified to Congress that too many minorities are being classified as having learning disabilities. Various members of Congress want to make it easier to suspend or expel kids for discipline issues. Numbers count. It is important that the Dept of Education hear from as many parents as possible. Everyone has something to say. The letter is preformatted to make responding as easy as possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2001 Report Share Posted November 20, 2001 Subj: IDEA Date: 11/20/01 8:06:39 AM Central Standard Time From: Crownova@... Vpar3auadv@... I am urging everyone to complete the e-mail form at http://www.specialkidsla.com/ideareauthorization.htm. -if you feel it is working and you like it the way it is, please tell them. -if your child has been helped by IDEA, please thank them. -if you have suggestions on how it could be improved, please give them your ideas. -if you feel it is burdensome, please let them know. Our children's right to a free, appropriate, public education is governed by this law. Parent participation in the IEP process was strengthened in the 1997 reauthorization, as was access to the general curriculum. What will the 2002 reauthorization include? Education Secretary Rod Paige is in favor of more funding for IDEA, but first he feels it must be fixed. Researchers at Harvard have testified to Congress that too many minorities are being classified as having learning disabilities. Various members of Congress want to make it easier to suspend or expel kids for discipline issues. Numbers count. It is important that the Dept of Education hear from as many parents as possible. Everyone has something to say. The letter is preformatted to make responding as easy as possible. ********************************************************************************************* Sorry everyone! I apologize for the cross-posting and the fact that the email didn't go through last time. However, IDEA is important to us all, and I felt that as many people as possible should be given the opportunity to respond. Thank you, Vickie N. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2003 Report Share Posted March 26, 2003 Idea We received this action alert from Liz Bauer about potential US House of Representatives action on the reauthorization of IDEA. We need to get the word out for students, parents and advocates to contact their Congress members and tell them why the bill is proposed should be rejected. Congressional activity is scheduled in TWO DAYS. We must act fast. The alert from the National Association of Protection and Advocacy Systems [NAPAS] is encapsulated below. You have our permission to pass this as far and wide and on as many list serves as possible so that our voices are heard before they enact bad law. The bill was only introduce! d on Marc Here are a few things that the proposed IDEA bill would do: Extend IEPs to 3-years and delete short term objective; Give schools unilateral power to transfer students to alternative settings for violating school rules; Eliminate Manifestation Determination reviews; Eliminate requirement for functional behavior assessments; Eliminate requirements for positive behavior support plans; Add one-month waiting period before any parent complaint could go to due process regardless of the problem or issue; Creates option of " voluntary binding arbitration " which would not provide any appeal path for parents or students; Please be sure to read the entire email for details. Michigan residents should contact Congressman Kildee, Ehlers, Upton and./or Hoekstra and let them know that this bill is loaded with problems and will decimate special education as we know it. Thanks, Tricia and Calvin NAPAS National Association of Protection & Advocacy Systems ACTION ALERT March 25, 2002 Critical IDEA Protections Threatened by House Reauthorization Bill Action Needed Immediately!!!!!!!!! BACKGROUND House Republicans introduced their bill to reauthorize the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act on March 19th. This bill (H.R. 1350) places free and appropriate public education opportunities for children with disabilities in jeopardy and severely limits the due process rights of parents. It is a legislative proposal that was developed largely without the input of family organizations or disability advocates. The leaders of the House Education and Workforce Committee are planning to " mark-up " this bill on THURSDAY, MARCH 27th - IN TWO DAYS!! A mark-up is when Members of the Committee debate the merits of the bill and make changes. After a bill is marked-up, it is voted on by the Committee and the next step is House floor action. A one-week turnaround does not allow parents or advocates sufficient time to read and comment on a bill that will have a major impact on the lives of children with disabilities and their families. This bill is full of problems. A few of the most critical are listed below. The bill would Allow IEPs to be written for three years rather than one year periods; it removes short term objectives which provide parents with useful information about the student's progress on important academic and non-academic goals. It would decimate the current IDEA discipline provisions; it would give schools the unilateral ability to send children with disabilities to Interim Alternate Educational Settings for simple violations of the school code; students receive fewer services in these settings and it would result in schools filled with students with disabilities; there is no clear " return " to the regular classroom; there would be no more Manifestation Determination Review (where the decision is made whether or not a behavior is related to the child's disability); there would be no more functional behavioral assessments or behavioral intervention plans;. It would establish a due process option of " voluntary binding arbitration " and, while on the surface this option might seem like a good idea, the problem is that parents don't always know all of their rights and options; if a parent selects voluntary binding arbitration, he or she loses all rights to appeal; if an arbitrator makes a bad decision, it can be very hard to overturn. It would make parents wait one month before any complaint they raise could go to due process, regardless of the problem or issue. It would establish a system of pre-referral interventions -- which may be a good idea -- however, it would divert already scarce funds away from IDEA-eligible students to provide services for non-IDEA eligible students. ACTION NEEDED: It would be best to work in coalition with parents, parent organizations, and disability organizations to get these important messages across. Contact the Leaders and Members of the House Education and the Workforce Committee AND the Members of the Education Reform Subcommittee and urge them to delay action on H.R. 1350 (see list below). Tell them that they should not rush to act on the bill without the support of the families and advocates of the more than six million children with disabilities who rely on IDEA for their future. Families and advocates do not support this bill. (Some legislators have been told that we do agree with the bill, they need to hear clearly that we do not.) Tell them that the outcome of any IDEA action should not only protect but also strengthen the educational services and supports available to children with all types of disabilities. This bill does not do that. Tell them that the outcome should protect and strengthen the procedural safeguards that are in place to help ensure that children get the services they need AND should protect and strengthen the due process protections for these children and their families. This bill does not do that. Use personal stories of IDEA successes!!!! Please let Kathy McGinley at NAPAS know what your Members say - Kathy@... or 202-408-9514. House Education and Workforce Committee Education Reform Subcommittee Members in Bold Repblicans Boehner (OH), Chairman Full Cmte. Petri (WI) Hoekstra (MI) McKeon (CA) Castle (DE), Chairman Education Reform Subcommittee Sam (TX) Jim Greenwood (PA) Norwood (GA) Fred Upton (MI) Vernon Ehlers (MI) Jim DeMint (SC) ny Isakson (GA) Judy Biggert (IL) Todd Platts (PA) Tiberi (OH) Ric Keller (FL) Tom Osborne (NE) Joe (SC) Tom Cole (OK) Jon Porter (NV) Tom Cole (OK) Kline (MN) (TX) Marilyn Musgrave (CO) Marsha Blackburn (TN) Phil Gingrey (GA) Max Burns (GA) Democrats (CA), Ranking Member Full Cmte. Dale Kildee (MI) Cass Ballenger (NC) Major Owens (NY) Payne (NJ) s (NJ) Lynn Woolsey (CA), Ranking Member, Education Reform Subcommittee Hinojosa (TX) Carolyn McCarthy (NY) Tierney (MA) Ron Kind (WI) Dennis Kucinich (OH) Wu (OR) Rush Holt (NJ) (CA) Betty McCollum (MN) Danny (IL) Ed Case (HI) Grijalva (AZ) Majette (GA) Van Hollen (MD) Tim (OH) Tim Bishop (NY) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 26, 2003 Report Share Posted March 26, 2003 Idea We received this action alert from Liz Bauer about potential US House of Representatives action on the reauthorization of IDEA. We need to get the word out for students, parents and advocates to contact their Congress members and tell them why the bill is proposed should be rejected. Congressional activity is scheduled in TWO DAYS. We must act fast. The alert from the National Association of Protection and Advocacy Systems [NAPAS] is encapsulated below. You have our permission to pass this as far and wide and on as many list serves as possible so that our voices are heard before they enact bad law. The bill was only introduce! d on Marc Here are a few things that the proposed IDEA bill would do: Extend IEPs to 3-years and delete short term objective; Give schools unilateral power to transfer students to alternative settings for violating school rules; Eliminate Manifestation Determination reviews; Eliminate requirement for functional behavior assessments; Eliminate requirements for positive behavior support plans; Add one-month waiting period before any parent complaint could go to due process regardless of the problem or issue; Creates option of " voluntary binding arbitration " which would not provide any appeal path for parents or students; Please be sure to read the entire email for details. Michigan residents should contact Congressman Kildee, Ehlers, Upton and./or Hoekstra and let them know that this bill is loaded with problems and will decimate special education as we know it. Thanks, Tricia and Calvin NAPAS National Association of Protection & Advocacy Systems ACTION ALERT March 25, 2002 Critical IDEA Protections Threatened by House Reauthorization Bill Action Needed Immediately!!!!!!!!! BACKGROUND House Republicans introduced their bill to reauthorize the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act on March 19th. This bill (H.R. 1350) places free and appropriate public education opportunities for children with disabilities in jeopardy and severely limits the due process rights of parents. It is a legislative proposal that was developed largely without the input of family organizations or disability advocates. The leaders of the House Education and Workforce Committee are planning to " mark-up " this bill on THURSDAY, MARCH 27th - IN TWO DAYS!! A mark-up is when Members of the Committee debate the merits of the bill and make changes. After a bill is marked-up, it is voted on by the Committee and the next step is House floor action. A one-week turnaround does not allow parents or advocates sufficient time to read and comment on a bill that will have a major impact on the lives of children with disabilities and their families. This bill is full of problems. A few of the most critical are listed below. The bill would Allow IEPs to be written for three years rather than one year periods; it removes short term objectives which provide parents with useful information about the student's progress on important academic and non-academic goals. It would decimate the current IDEA discipline provisions; it would give schools the unilateral ability to send children with disabilities to Interim Alternate Educational Settings for simple violations of the school code; students receive fewer services in these settings and it would result in schools filled with students with disabilities; there is no clear " return " to the regular classroom; there would be no more Manifestation Determination Review (where the decision is made whether or not a behavior is related to the child's disability); there would be no more functional behavioral assessments or behavioral intervention plans;. It would establish a due process option of " voluntary binding arbitration " and, while on the surface this option might seem like a good idea, the problem is that parents don't always know all of their rights and options; if a parent selects voluntary binding arbitration, he or she loses all rights to appeal; if an arbitrator makes a bad decision, it can be very hard to overturn. It would make parents wait one month before any complaint they raise could go to due process, regardless of the problem or issue. It would establish a system of pre-referral interventions -- which may be a good idea -- however, it would divert already scarce funds away from IDEA-eligible students to provide services for non-IDEA eligible students. ACTION NEEDED: It would be best to work in coalition with parents, parent organizations, and disability organizations to get these important messages across. Contact the Leaders and Members of the House Education and the Workforce Committee AND the Members of the Education Reform Subcommittee and urge them to delay action on H.R. 1350 (see list below). Tell them that they should not rush to act on the bill without the support of the families and advocates of the more than six million children with disabilities who rely on IDEA for their future. Families and advocates do not support this bill. (Some legislators have been told that we do agree with the bill, they need to hear clearly that we do not.) Tell them that the outcome of any IDEA action should not only protect but also strengthen the educational services and supports available to children with all types of disabilities. This bill does not do that. Tell them that the outcome should protect and strengthen the procedural safeguards that are in place to help ensure that children get the services they need AND should protect and strengthen the due process protections for these children and their families. This bill does not do that. Use personal stories of IDEA successes!!!! Please let Kathy McGinley at NAPAS know what your Members say - Kathy@... or 202-408-9514. House Education and Workforce Committee Education Reform Subcommittee Members in Bold Repblicans Boehner (OH), Chairman Full Cmte. Petri (WI) Hoekstra (MI) McKeon (CA) Castle (DE), Chairman Education Reform Subcommittee Sam (TX) Jim Greenwood (PA) Norwood (GA) Fred Upton (MI) Vernon Ehlers (MI) Jim DeMint (SC) ny Isakson (GA) Judy Biggert (IL) Todd Platts (PA) Tiberi (OH) Ric Keller (FL) Tom Osborne (NE) Joe (SC) Tom Cole (OK) Jon Porter (NV) Tom Cole (OK) Kline (MN) (TX) Marilyn Musgrave (CO) Marsha Blackburn (TN) Phil Gingrey (GA) Max Burns (GA) Democrats (CA), Ranking Member Full Cmte. Dale Kildee (MI) Cass Ballenger (NC) Major Owens (NY) Payne (NJ) s (NJ) Lynn Woolsey (CA), Ranking Member, Education Reform Subcommittee Hinojosa (TX) Carolyn McCarthy (NY) Tierney (MA) Ron Kind (WI) Dennis Kucinich (OH) Wu (OR) Rush Holt (NJ) (CA) Betty McCollum (MN) Danny (IL) Ed Case (HI) Grijalva (AZ) Majette (GA) Van Hollen (MD) Tim (OH) Tim Bishop (NY) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2007 Report Share Posted March 4, 2007 I think we need to craft an article that summarizes the stories of several persons (with their permission) and then submit this to a publication like the NY Times Magazine. If you read their back issues you can see they cover a myriad of issues and hyperaldosteronism, if well written, might well get published. I am happy to help but have not written for this type of a magazine before and expect the competition would be very tough. Suggest we start with a general article on how badly BP is currently measured in the practice of medicine today. I know it is the most frequent medical error and likely results in more deaths and disability than all other medical errors. May your pressure be low! Clarence E. Grim, B.S., M.S., M.D. Senior Consultant to Shared Care Research and Consulting, Inc. (sharedcareinc.com) Clinical Professor of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology Med. Col. WI Clinical Professor of Nursing, Univ. of WI, Milwaukee Specializing in Difficult to Control High Blood Pressure and the Physiology and History of Survival During Hard Times and Heart Disease today. ************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2007 Report Share Posted March 4, 2007 Fran, With all due respect, the next time when you get angry about something that unintentionally offends you, please consider how your reaction to it may harm others and even yourself. Have you considered that people who read your comment will be less likely to be open about their own personal stories since big brother FOX News might be watching? While this is a " public forum " to a degree, I suspect a number of us would not want some of our rather personal stories being explicitly shared with the news media without our permission. Keep in mind that the secondary symptoms of hyperaldosteronism are rather broad. Along with the physiologic issues, there can also be rather disturbing (to both the individual and 3rd parties) and sometimes severe psychiatric problems that folks would rather not air without explicit permission on television news. ly, I find " all that crap " on TV merely a bit annoying because it is not directed at me...it just happens to be on my TV set. What angers me (and I'm not easily angered) is when someone decides they have the right to expose my personal comments to the news media because it will assuage their anger and, perhaps, do some public good. -J > > Hi All, > > I get angry at all the crap I see on the news about diet and exercise > accompanied by film clips of overweight people walking down the > street. Sometimes I fire off an angry message to the news and try to > introduce them to the problems of hormones runing wild. Of course they > don't pay attention to the ravings of a lunatic. In the message I sent > to Fox News the other day, I told them about this group and gave them a > link to this web site and suggested that they assign a person to > monitor it. Of course, I doubt they will do that. However, I thought > that if a bunch of us wrote in, it may get their attention enough to > check into it. If anyone wants to e-mail them, the address is: > comments@... I figure it is worth a try, what we need is to > get our story to the media and I hope some of you will join me in > trying. > > Fran > > Fran > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2007 Report Share Posted March 5, 2007 J Sorry for being so ignorant. I am one of those people with this illness who goes into a rage over every little thing. Obviously my idea was incredibly stupid! Fran > > > > Hi All, > > > > I get angry at all the crap I see on the news about diet and exercise > > accompanied by film clips of overweight people walking down the > > street. Sometimes I fire off an angry message to the news and try to > > introduce them to the problems of hormones runing wild. Of course they > > don't pay attention to the ravings of a lunatic. In the message I sent > > to Fox News the other day, I told them about this group and gave them a > > link to this web site and suggested that they assign a person to > > monitor it. Of course, I doubt they will do that. However, I thought > > that if a bunch of us wrote in, it may get their attention enough to > > check into it. If anyone wants to e-mail them, the address is: > > comments@ I figure it is worth a try, what we need is to > > get our story to the media and I hope some of you will join me in > > trying. > > > > Fran > > > > Fran > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2007 Report Share Posted March 5, 2007 J Sorry for being so ignorant. I am one of those people with this illness who goes into a rage over every little thing. Obviously my idea was incredibly stupid! Fran > > > > Hi All, > > > > I get angry at all the crap I see on the news about diet and exercise > > accompanied by film clips of overweight people walking down the > > street. Sometimes I fire off an angry message to the news and try to > > introduce them to the problems of hormones runing wild. Of course they > > don't pay attention to the ravings of a lunatic. In the message I sent > > to Fox News the other day, I told them about this group and gave them a > > link to this web site and suggested that they assign a person to > > monitor it. Of course, I doubt they will do that. However, I thought > > that if a bunch of us wrote in, it may get their attention enough to > > check into it. If anyone wants to e-mail them, the address is: > > comments@ I figure it is worth a try, what we need is to > > get our story to the media and I hope some of you will join me in > > trying. > > > > Fran > > > > Fran > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2007 Report Share Posted March 5, 2007 Dr. Grim, The point I want to get out is that a lot of doctors are incredibly careless about treating their patients. I have read posts in blaming managed care because doctors ignore test results. It is not managed care, it is the mindset of doctors. Is is possible for a doctor to go somewhere (by internet or phone) to research a patients symptoms? Obviously not because they never do it. I have excellent insurance and I can go anywhere to any doctor without referrels but is does me no good. I had one doctor that told me PVCs were normal and that everyone had them. He also ignored a weight gain of 10 pounds in 10 days. Earlier when I pointed out to him that both my K and sodium levels were both on the bottom number of the range, he said they were OK because they were within range. A couple of months later, I pointed out that my sodium level was BELOW normal range but he said it wasn't low enough to be a problem If he had the brains to realize that there was a problem, I might not be in this condition today. My current doctor knows my bp has been out of control for 7 years but doesn't even listen to my heart. He is only good for writing RX when I need them. There have been other ignorant doctors in-between. Writing an article to the NY times is useless. If they have published several articles on hyperaldosteronism what good did they do? Did they do anything to improve medical recognition of the condition? If a patient does research and decides maybe aldosterone is their problem, it does no good if the doctor they go to tells them they don't have PA. Fran > > I think we need to craft an article that summarizes the stories of several > persons (with their permission) and then submit this to a publication like the > NY Times Magazine. If you read their back issues you can see they cover a > myriad of issues and hyperaldosteronism, if well written, might well get > published. > > I am happy to help but have not written for this type of a magazine before > and expect the competition would be very tough. Suggest we start with a > general article on how badly BP is currently measured in the practice of medicine > today. I know it is the most frequent medical error and likely results in more > deaths and disability than all other medical errors. > > > > May your pressure be low! > > Clarence E. Grim, B.S., M.S., M.D. > Senior Consultant to Shared Care Research and Consulting, Inc. > (sharedcareinc.com) > Clinical Professor of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology Med. Col. WI > Clinical Professor of Nursing, Univ. of WI, Milwaukee > > Specializing in Difficult to Control High Blood Pressure > and the Physiology and History of Survival During > Hard Times and Heart Disease today. > > > > ************************************** > AOL now offers free email to everyone. > Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2007 Report Share Posted March 5, 2007 Fran, The idea itself was not stupid, nor are you, as there needs to be a better understanding of PA out there given how common it appears to be. Your illness was speaking on your behalf...that's all. I've been there myself. Before my diagnosis of PA last year, a psychiatrist had dx'ed me with " Intermittent Explosive Disorder " and was treating me for it with Cymbalta which was a magic pill for me. In other words, with the PA untreated and no psych meds I'd go into rages that would stop just short of physical violence with little provocation or none at all. Beyond the rages, there was a great deal of generalized anxiety which would cause me to speak (or send emails) without thinking. When the psychiatrist learned of my PA dx, he told me that most likely the rages and anxiety were a direct result of the PA and that I'd probably be able to get off the meds post surgery. He was absolutely correct. The secondary psych issues evaporated immediately following my adrenalectomy, and I was able to stop the psych drugs over a 5 day period with no ill effect. I have no idea whether aldosterone blocker medications help with the psych issues, but I suspect some of the bilateral disease folks on board here can comment on that as well as Dr. Grim. Best wishes, J > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I get angry at all the crap I see on the news about diet and > exercise > > > accompanied by film clips of overweight people walking down the > > > street. Sometimes I fire off an angry message to the news and > try to > > > introduce them to the problems of hormones runing wild. Of > course they > > > don't pay attention to the ravings of a lunatic. In the message > I sent > > > to Fox News the other day, I told them about this group and gave > them a > > > link to this web site and suggested that they assign a person to > > > monitor it. Of course, I doubt they will do that. However, I > thought > > > that if a bunch of us wrote in, it may get their attention enough > to > > > check into it. If anyone wants to e-mail them, the address is: > > > comments@ I figure it is worth a try, what we need is to > > > get our story to the media and I hope some of you will join me in > > > trying. > > > > > > Fran > > > > > > Fran > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2007 Report Share Posted March 5, 2007 As I note in article in the files one problem is that the usual meds dont work in PA and as the doses are pushed up the side effects increase. I have also seen this in the old days with renal artery stenosis in which the mental problems like not being able to balance the check book disappeared after the correction of the renal artery stenosis and the cure of the HTN and stopping of the meds. But again there is not systematic data on this issue, ie changes in mental funcioning during the develolpment of PA and its realtionship to the drugs that dont work in this disease and the regression after the removal of a unilateral source. In a message dated 3/5/07 1:44:26 PM, datawrhsdoc@... writes: Fran, The idea itself was not stupid, nor are you, as there needs to be a better understanding of PA out there given how common it appears to be. Your illness was speaking on your behalf...that' be. Your illnes there myself. Before my diagnosis of PA last year, a psychiatrist had dx'ed me with "Intermittent Explosive Disorder" and was treating me for it with Cymbalta which was a magic pill for me. In other words, with the PA untreated and no psych meds I'd go into rages that would stop just short of physical violence with little provocation or none at all. Beyond the rages, there was a great deal of generalized anxiety which would cause me to speak (or send emails) without thinking. When the psychiatrist learned of my PA dx, he told me that most likely the rages and anxiety were a direct result of the PA and that I'd probably be able to get off the meds post surgery. He was absolutely correct. The secondary psych issues evaporated immediately following my adrenalectomy, and I was able to stop the psych drugs over a 5 day period with no ill effect. I have no idea whether aldosterone blocker medications help with the psych issues, but I suspect some of the bilateral disease folks on board here can comment on that as well as Dr. Grim. Best wishes, J > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I get angry at all the crap I see on the news about diet and > exercise > > > accompanied by film clips of overweight people walking down the > > > street. Sometimes I fire off an angry message to the news and > try to > > > introduce them to the problems of hormones runing wild. Of > course they > > > don't pay attention to the ravings of a lunatic. In the message > I sent > > > to Fox News the other day, I told them about this group and gave > them a > > > link to this web site and suggested that they assign a person to > > > monitor it. Of course, I doubt they will do that. However, I > thought > > > that if a bunch of us wrote in, it may get their attention enough > to > > > check into it. If anyone wants to e-mail them, the address is: > > > comments@ I figure it is worth a try, what we need is to > > > get our story to the media and I hope some of you will join me in > > > trying. > > > > > > Fran > > > > > > Fran > > > > > > May your pressure be low! Clarence E. Grim, B.S., M.S., M.D. Senior Consultant to Shared Care Research and Consulting, Inc. (sharedcareinc.com) Clinical Professor of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology Med. Col. WI Clinical Professor of Nursing, Univ. of WI, Milwaukee Specializing in Difficult to Control High Blood Pressure and the Physiology and History of Survival During Hard Times and Heart Disease today. ************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2007 Report Share Posted March 5, 2007 Only way to say one does not have PA is to test for it. Unless they know some tricks I do not. In a message dated 3/5/07 1:27:16 PM, frand2@... writes: Dr. Grim, The point I want to get out is that a lot of doctors are incredibly careless about treating their patients. I have read posts in blaming managed care because doctors ignore test results. It is not managed care, it is the mindset of doctors. Is is possible for a doctor to go somewhere (by internet or phone) to research a patients symptoms? Yes but many do not. Obviously not because they never do it. I have excellent insurance and I can go anywhere to any doctor without referrels but is does me no good. I had one doctor that told me PVCs were normal and that everyone had them. He also ignored a weight gain of 10 pounds in 10 days. Earlier when I pointed out to him that both my K and sodium levels were both on the bottom number of the range, he said they were OK because they were within range. A couple of months later, I pointed out that my sodium level was BELOW normal range but he said it wasn't low enough to be a problem If he had the brains to realize that there was a problem, I might not be in this condition today. My current doctor knows my bp has been out of control for 7 years but doesn't even listen to my heart. He is only good for writing RX when I need them. There have been other ignorant doctors in-between. Writing an article to the NY times is useless. If they have published several articles on hyperaldosteronism what good did they do? Did they do anything to improve medical recognition of the condition? If a patient does research and decides maybe aldosterone is their problem, it does no good if the doctor they go to tells them they don't have PA. Fran > > I think we need to craft an article that summarizes the stories of several > persons (with their permission) and then submit this to a publication like the > NY Times Magazine. If you read their back issues you can see they cover a > myriad of issues and hyperaldosteronism, if well written, might well get > published. > > I am happy to help but have not written for this type of a magazine before > and expect the competition would be very tough. Suggest we start with a > general article on how badly BP is currently measured in the practice of medicine > today. I know it is the most frequent medical error and likely results in more > deaths and disability than all other medical errors. > > > > May your pressure be low! > > Clarence E. Grim, B.S., M.S., M.D. > Senior Consultant to Shared Care Research and Consulting, Inc. > (sharedcareinc. (sh > Clinical Professor of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology Med. Col. WI > Clinical Professor of Nursing, Univ. of WI, Milwaukee > > Specializing in Difficult to Control High Blood Pressure > and the Physiology and History of Survival During > Hard Times and Heart Disease today. > > > > ************ ******** ******** ******* > AOL now offers free email to everyone. > Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.http > May your pressure be low! Clarence E. Grim, B.S., M.S., M.D. Senior Consultant to Shared Care Research and Consulting, Inc. (sharedcareinc.com) Clinical Professor of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology Med. Col. WI Clinical Professor of Nursing, Univ. of WI, Milwaukee Specializing in Difficult to Control High Blood Pressure and the Physiology and History of Survival During Hard Times and Heart Disease today. ************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2008 Report Share Posted April 24, 2008 Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, Inc. a national voice for special education rights and advocacy PO Box 6767 , Towson MD 21285 www.copaa.org<http://www.copaa.org/> email: protectidea@...<mailto:protectidea@...> Call your Congressional Representative on Tuesday, May 6! Ask Congress to Support the IDEA Fairness Restoration Act, H.R. 4188! Help Parents Recover Expert Witness Fees and Level the Playing Field! 202-224-3121 PLEASE CALL YOUR CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVES ON TUESDAY, MAY 6, AND ASK THEM TO CO-SPONSOR THE IDEA FAIRNESS RESTORATION ACT, H.R. 4188. This bill will allow parents who prevail in due process or litigation under IDEA recover their expert witness fees. Few parents can afford the thousands of dollars needed to pay for expert testimony that is often necessary to prevail in IDEA cases. But school districts can use tax dollars to employ and pay for psychologists and other paid experts. Parents have fewer resources and yet must bear a greater financial burden. H.R. 4188 is necessary to restore Congress' original intent and allow parents to recover their expert witness fees. Introduced by Congressman Chris Van Hollen (land) and Pete Sessions (Texas), it will help level the playing field for the parents of millions of children with disabilities. Over 100 disability organizations, including the Consortium of Citizens with Disabilities, Arc, Easter Seals, the Council of Parent Attorneys & Advocates, Inc., National Disability Rights Network, National Down Syndrome Society, National Down Syndrome Congress, Learning Disabilities Association, National Center for Learning Disabilities, CHADD, and others support H.R. 4188. But we need your help to get it passed. Call Congress on Tuesday, May 6, 2008 Ask them to Cosponsor H.R. 4188 On Tuesday, May 6, 2008, please call your Congressional Representatives (202-224-3121) and ask them to cosponsor H.R. 4188, the IDEA Fairness Restoration Act. Have friends and family members call. It will only take 2-3 minutes. If you do not know who your Congressional Representative is, go to http://www.house.gov<http://www.house.gov/> and put your zip code into the box in the upper left corner. (You usually only need your five digit zip code.) You can also use http://www.congress.org<http://www.congress.org/> to look up Representatives and phone numbers. PLEASE CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES INSTEAD OF USING EMAIL. Congress needs to hear our voices and hear from as many parents and child advocates as possible! It helps if you ask for the Education Aide, but you can also talk to the person who answers the phone. You can leave a voicemail message. Tell them you are a constituent and would like the Congressperson to co-sponsor H.R. 4188, the IDEA Fairness Restoration Act. Please make a phone call on May 6, even if you've made one before. If you can't call on May 6, it's okay to call afterwards. H.R. 4188 is sponsored by 20 representatives, but more cosponsors are needed to help build support for the bill. Please call your Congressperson on May 6 and ask them to join the list of co-sponsors. The following are already sponsors: Neil Abercrombie (HI), Baker (LA), Earl Blumenauer (OR), Ginny Brown-Waite (FL), Dan Burton (IN), Steve Cohen (TN), Danny (IL), DeFazio (OR), (TX), Honda (CA), Ray LaHood (IL), Zoe Lofgren (CA), Moran (VA), Grace Napolitano (CA), Payne (NJ), Janice Schakowsky (IL), Pete Sessions (TX), Pete Stark (CA), Van Hollen (MD), and Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL). We thank them for their support! Let's add more! Why It's Important to Cosponsor the IDEA Fairness Restoration Act (H.R. 4188). The IDEA Fairness Restoration Act would override the Supreme Court's decision in Arlington Central School District v. (2006) and allow parents who prevail in due process or litigation to be reimbursed for their expert witness fees. When prevailing parents cannot recover expert costs, the playing field is neither level nor fair, and children are denied a free appropriate public education and other fundamental IDEA rights. * Hiring qualified medical, technical, and other expert witnesses can cost many thousands of dollars. Few parents can afford this high cost, putting due process out of reach for most parents, who struggle to afford what their children with disabilities need. * School districts use tax dollars to pay for psychologists and other paid experts. Parents have fewer resources and yet must bear a greater financial burden. Approximately 36% of children with disabilities live in families earning less than $25,000 a year; over 2/3 earn less than $50,000 a year. * Congress intended for parents to recover their expert witness fees in the Handicapped Children's Protection Act of 1986. Allowing parents to recoup their expert fees simply restores Congress' original intent. * If due process is not affordable, the IEP process becomes even more one-sided and unfair. School personnel control the IEP process and often vastly outnumber parents. When the right to due process is meaningful, it helps ensure that school districts provide appropriate educations to children with disabilities. * Most parents turn to due process and litigation only as a last resort. In 2003, the GAO reported that there were only 5 hearings per 10,000 special education students. But when parents are forced into due process, they should be able to afford expert witnesses. Want more detailed information? Download COPAA's complete brochure on the IDEA Fairness Restoration Act and enabling parents to recover expert fees, http://www.copaa.org/pdf/Brochure.pdf There is also a Spanish language version, http://www.copaa.org/pdf/MSSpanish.pdf (Lea aqui en Espanol: y los derechos de los padres para recuperar el costo de los expertos: http://www.copaa.org/pdf/MSSpanish.pdf ) You can read H.R. 4188 here: http://www.copaa.org/news/IRFAct.html You can read letters from over 100 disability organizations supporting H.R. 4188 here: http://www.copaa.org/news/organizations.html For more information about H.R. 4188 and this alert, please contact Bob Berlow and Jess of COPAA at protectidea@...<mailto:protectidea@...> Together, we can make the difference and restore a balanced playing field for children with disabilities. Let Congress hear your voice on May 6! Ask your Representative to cosponsor H.R. 4188, the IDEA Fairness Restoration Act. Call Congress, 202-224-3121. COPAA-News is an opt-in communication from the Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates. To stop receiving COPAA-News, send e-mail to COPAA-News-unsubscribe-request@... Read archives at http://listserv.icors.org/archives/copaa-news.html Stengle, M.Ed. Cell 484-868-0443 Work 610-265-4700 Ex 211 Di Judge not, and ye shall not be judged. Condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned. Forgive, and ye shall be forgiven. Luke 6:37 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.