Re: The CDC Document/ Who would like to help?

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 10/28/2005 4:27:06 AM Pacific Standard Time,

ldelp84227@... writes:

Sharon, I will help. Just tell me what you want. I don't know why we

can't make our own type evidence with our test results. Just a

thought.

That would come under clinical findings. And yes, we do need some of that.

[Guest guest]

>

> Hi Guys,

>

> I have read the CDC doc. It has many holes and weazel words within

it. The

> biggest problem they have is the science. There is nothing to

support that

> what we are experiencing is not real. I have been asking around

among many

> professionals. The only two docs that say it is not plausible we

are ill is

Sharon, I will help. Just tell me what you want. I don't know why we

can't make our own type evidence with our test results. Just a

thought.

[Guest guest]

> Why did you not describe the symptoms of toxicity, given the fact that it is

> known illness caused by being eaten or touched, and highly " suspected " from

> being inhaled? You need emphasis on the cognitive and neurological impacts of

> mold/toxins in this doc if it is really about public safety.

>

> Why is your document slanted to imply inhaling toxicity from some mold

> toxins is not probably, as opposed to erring on the side of public safety and

> saying it is possible, has been reported and we just don't know?.

In the article " Toxic Surfs " that I posted here, it very clearly states that

mechanisms of

toxicity are inhaled. Period.

Much more so than bathing in the water being absorbed through the skin.

There are some links at the bottom to the studies.

I wish they wouldn't speak like lawyers, and talk like scientists. It is really

infuriating.