Guest guest Posted February 15, 2012 Report Share Posted February 15, 2012 Here is what should be an easy exchange between myself and the Resource Teacher/Case Manager. For 3 years I've tried to get this woman to just (1) answer a simple question with a simple answer (see " when is the meeting? Still don't know) and (2) fill out a darn piece of paperwork correctly. It's not like I want to keep correcting her, but she sent a full eval plan for approval...academic, speech, IQ, social/emotional/adaptive, health and SCIA (Special Circumstances Instructional Aide) with no explanation of which tests they are going to do, and expects me to just sign it (as they know my feeling about IQ testing .) And, does anyone here buy into the statement below about " being able to assess what she is going to be able to accomplish in high school. " ??? Me thinks these next couple months are going to be even more challenging than I thought.... the program specialist last year at her Tri basically said she didn't think should be included with an aide, and that she should be in a self-contained class with some mainstreaming. We will look at all options (if they let us in to observe, LOL) but it sounded like the program specialist has her mind made up as to " what is best " for .... she has not yet chimed in, and she's one pushing for IQ testing... will be interesting..... , mom to (16), (14 DS), and Sammy (12), auntie to (18) ================================================================================\ ============== Hi , I sent home the evaluation plan last week with but haven't heard back from you or gotten the evaluation form back. Please let me know if you have any questions. =========================================== Hi Sharon, Sorry, I've been looking through her previous evaluations to try and figure out what the plan was, and I do have some questions. First of all, she had her triennial last year, so is all this testing necessary? We do not need to qualify for her anything, so it seems like a waste of time and resources. The Notice of Proposed Action indicates this is her Triennial; should it not say " Annual Review? " We have decided that we will decline any IQ testing, as we do not see the benefit to . She does not need a health assessment either... if the nurse would like updated information, I'm happy to provide that, but it seems like a full assessment is unnecessary. Finally, unless required by law, we will decline the SCIA evaluation; as we discuss 's placement for next year, and I are open to considering all options available to , but I don't feel that another SCIA eval is necessary. Finally, on the Notice of Proposed Action, it says and IEP meeting notice is attached and I should sign and return; there was no meeting notice attached. Can you refresh my memory as to exactly when her IEP is schedule for? Thanks, ============================================== Hi , The NOPA says both that it will be her triennial and annual review. I marked the wrong box on it as it should say evaluation not a review yet. Other than those technicalities our purpose in wanting to have the IQ testing is as I stated ,and as Betsy said in one of our last meetings, that we want the information to help accurately assess what she is going to be able to accomplish in high school. This will help us to correctly place her in classes for next year and beyond. Her annual due date is 4/26/2012. I will forward your response to (Program Specialist/Administrator) and (School Psychologist.) ================================================= Hi Sharon, What I understand in general terms that somehow, not the IQ number, but _some_ parts of _some_ subtests _might_ help develop goals; I don't recall anything about placement coming from this test. If that is the case, then we absolutely have no interest in reconsidering, as I do not believe that IQ is an indicator of success in a particular environment, nor what she will be able to accomplish in high school... I don't think there is any evaluation that can make that prediction for or any other child! What I've never got in a quantifiable, clear, not-fuzzy way was how information from the IQ test could help or the team. If someone can share more than " it will help us to develop goals " than I am happy to reconsider, but we went through this 4 years ago at her trienial prior to her middle school transition, and I've never seen anyone (teacher, specialist, therapist, administrator) refer to anything from this report, not the year it was done, nor in any subsequent years. I realize this data is now " old " but perhaps someone could look back at the last report and tell me what they might have gleaned from the " subtest data " or whatever else might be used besides the overall IQ score. Otherwise, as you know, I believe that the overall score will not be indicative of 's potential, and that it will be " used against her " in making placement and other decisions. Thank you for letting me know the due date, but I thought that you had already scheduled your IEP meetings for the year; do you have a date for 's meeting that I can put onto the calendar? Thanks, ============================ No reply from anyone at school...... wonder when I'll hear back :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.