Guest guest Posted October 27, 2005 Report Share Posted October 27, 2005 Cherokee sues over leaky fire stations By CLINT WILLIAMS The Atlanta Journal-Constitution Published on: 10/25/05 Atlanta Journal Constitution - GA http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/cherokee/1005/25cherosuit.html Five Cherokee County fire stations have leaky roofs and county commissioners have filed a lawsuit to get them fixed. The county filed a suit against M.G. Patton Construction Co. and a lengthy list of subcontractors, charging that improper design and poor workmanship are responsible for mold contamination and other damage to the buildings. The county is asking for money to repair the buildings and to repay money spent by the county resulting from the damage. There is no price tag on the damages, said County Attorney Mark Mahler, " because we're still in the process of determining what the damages are. " The five stations were built by Patton between the spring of 2000 and January 2002. One of the five fire stations — Fire Station 21 near Ball Ground in the northeast corner of the county — was abandoned by firefighters in May. Firefighters moved out of the mold-plagued fire station to allow crews to knock out a bathroom wall to remove mold. Repairs have yet to be completed on the building. By filing the lawsuit, the county joins a group of firefighters taking legal action against the contractor. Firefighters have complained that mold at Station 21, Station 4 in Free Home and Station 12 in Waleska is causing serious health problems in people assigned to those stations. More than 40 firefighters are plaintiffs in a $60 million lawsuit filed in February 2004 against the company. The suit accuses M.G. Patton Construction Co. of poor construction practices that allowed mold to contaminate the buildings. Each of the $1.2 million multi-purpose buildings include a fire station, community meeting room and sheriff's department office. It may take as much as $300,000 to $400,000 to repair each building, said Cherokee County Commissioner Jim Hubbard. The air-conditioning system of each building is inadequate, Hubbard said, allowing high indoor humidity that encourages the growth of mold. Fama, the attorney representing Patton Construction, declined to comment Tuesday because he hadn't seen the lawsuit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.