Guest guest Posted November 26, 2005 Report Share Posted November 26, 2005 I have come across several situations such as this within the last 10 years. Not knowing all the facts makes it that much more difficult to comment on what had actually taken place. I have dealt with several individuals that have filed mold claims, medical claims and the affects that it has on them/family, I'm not speaking of this individual case here. Where the facts did not add up, their story was all over the road, questionable at best. Also, the effects of these toxins they said they were experiencing, they could only speak in very general terms. An example of this; One person I knew moved into an apartment, all their belongings in sealed plastic containers and after 15 minutes complained that they were sick from mold and that all their belongings were contaminated. This was not a " hit " like many of us experience, this was their FIRST encounter. They filed suit for damages, needless to say they lost, but they now consider themselves a " mold victim/survivor/expert " and advise others on the effects of mold. Nice huh? It's situtations like this that give all true victims a bad name and when I come across fradulant claims, if there is someone I can contact I will turn them in. This in the long run hurts all of us. Sorry to say, in this world there are always some that are out to make an easy buck or looking for that big payoff and it will always catch up with them. I think this is the difference between them and us, many of us are just trying to recover what we have lost and to regain our health. There really is no dollar amount that could replace the life you have lost. KC Texas Court Awards State Farm $221,000 On Fraud Counterclaims by Publishing HOUSTON — A federal judge ordered a State Farm Lloyds policyholder to repay more than $80,000 in alternative living expenses and $141,000 in attorneys fees and costs after the carrier proved that the policyholder committed fraud in connection with a mold damage claim. v. State Farm Lloyds, No. H-04-0352 (S.D. Texas). Maureen sued State Farm Lloyds for breach of contract, bad faith and violation of the Texas Insurance Code and Deceptive Trade Practices Act, alleging that State Farm Lloyds failed to properly investigate mold and water damage claims and refused to properly fund repairs to her Houston home. State Farm Lloyds moved the case from state court to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas in January 2004. said in an amended complaint that she reported seven instances of water intrusion or leaks from an air conditioner and water heater between Jan. 2, 2002, and Aug. 14, 2003. She also asserted in her complaint that State Farm denied a 1999 claim for damage from an overflow in an air conditioner pan, which resulted in mold damage. filed suit after State Farm Lloyds denied a 2004 claim for mold and water damage related to an overflowing French drain. complained that State Farm hired an engineering firm known for bias toward insurance companies, and that the carrier's failure to pay for adequate remediation caused to suffer permanent injuries and incur $100,000 in medical expenses. State Farm filed a counterclaim and affirmative defenses on March 31, alleging that was guilty of fraud in claiming additional living expenses for herself and her mother, Henrietta White. State Farm paid a total of $126,680 between April 2002 and April 2004 based, in part, on documents provided showing a monthly rental fee of $4,500 to 'Triangle Trust.' failed to appear for a June 21 hearing on pending motions and on June 27 her attorney notified the court that documents submitted by and White in support of 's attorney informed the court on June 27 that various documents submitted to the court by and her mother were false. Counsel also informed the court that was withdrawing all claims against State Farm Lloyds. State Farm decided to pursue its counterclaim. filed a pro se bankruptcy petition on July 7, which temporarily halted proceedings in the civil action. The bankruptcy court granted State Farm's motion for relief from the automatic stay on Aug. 11, and on Oct. 13, U.S. District Judge Lee H. Rosenthal issued Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in State Farm's favor. Relying on deposition testimony, filings from 's two bankruptcy proceedings, and drawing adverse conclusions from 's assertion of her Fifth Amendment rights during an earlier hearing, Judge Rosenthal concluded that had submitted fraudulent lease documents and that her actions voided the insurance contract. Judge Rosenthal also concluded that 's bad faith and statutory claims against State Farm Lloyds were brought in bad faith. Judge Rosenthal concluded that 'Triangle Trust' was actually a trust created in 2000 by 's mother for estate planning purposes, and that the house rented for $4,500 was actually purchased by and her mother and was the security for a monthly mortgage of $1,156.90. The judge also noted that while represented to State Farm that the replacement value of her personal property was $341,759 and she owned original paintings by Renoir, Rembrandt and Picasso, she stated in bankruptcy proceedings that she owned collectibles worth $2,500 and personal property valued at $1,300. Judge Rosenthal also noted discrepancies in lost business income reported to State Farm and her representation to the bankruptcy court in 2001 that she had no income from self-operated businesses. Judge Rosenthal ruled that State Farm was entitled to recover from the difference between the actual mortgage payments made by and the payments made by State Farm, or $80,234.40, and attorneys fees and costs to State Farm for the cost of defending her bad faith claim and prosecuting its counterclaim. The judge issued a separate order on Nov. 16 ordering to pay State Farm Lloyds $129,150 in fees and $12,281.34 in costs. F. Jr. and P. of Houston represented . State Farm Lloyds was represented by W. , Deborah E. Rank and Holly W. Kowis of Disiere in Houston. For More Information on this article, please click on the links below: Related Document: Findings of Fact - MOL-0511-06 (PDF format) Related Document: Order - MOL-0511-07 (PDF format) Related Document: Complaint - MOL-0511-08 (PDF format) # # # Pure Air Control Services, Inc. 1-800-422-7873 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.