Re: Re: RE:The Shampoo/Toxin Connection

[Guest guest]

There is NO FEDERAL requirement for the cosmetic and beatuy care

companies to prove their products are safe.

Becasue they are calssified as food and nutrition and they tend to get

away with that little codicil. But they ARE SHIRKING federal labeling by

not citing if an ingredient carrys a warning the finished must also carry

the same one.

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, ldelp84227 wrote:

> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 04:31:22 -0000

> From: ldelp84227 <ldelp84227@...>

> Reply-

>

> Subject: [] Re: RE:The Shampoo/Toxin Connection

>

>

> I hate to tell you millions of people suffer from everyday fragrance,

> shampoo, toothpaste, cosmetics, cleaning products. We have mcs,

> reactive airways disease or severe asthma. Many mold victims have

> this terrible illness.

>

>

>> On 11/26/05, Gil Vice <gilvice@h...> wrote:

>>>

>>> Let's not get too carried away with criticism or commercial

> shampoos.

>>> Millions of people use them with no problems whatsoever. Products

> from

>>> major

>>> companies, such as Lever, P & G, Henkel, Dial, etc.are well

> researched and

>>> safe. Some people (like me) have problems with some highly scented

>>> products

>>> from some smaller companies. If so, try a different brand.

>>>

>>> Propylene glycol is not a poison. It has been used for years in

> foods,

>>> including the icing of Oreo cookies. It is also used in some hand

> lotions.

>>> It is also used in some toothpastes. It is used in some

> antifreeze, the

>>> environmentally friendly ones. Ethylene glycol antifreeze is very

> toxic

>>> and

>>> has caused the deaths of many pets and other mammals which drink

> the sweet

>>> liquid left lying by back yard mechanics.

>>>

>>> Sodium lauryl sulfate is used in some engine degreasers. It is

> also used

>>> in many laundry and dishwashing detergents. It is a good

> surfactant. It

>>> may

>>> be a little irritating to some people. It is commonly used with

> sodium

>>> laureth sulfate in shampoos. This is a milder version, with

> possibly less

>>> cleaning ability. Re-read the chemical weapons article. It does

> not say

>>> that

>>> sodium lauryl sulfate is toxic. It is used to make bio-warfare

> agents more

>>> easily dispersible, just as it is used in agriculture to make

> pesicides

>>> and

>>> herbicides better dispersible, and to cling to leaves longer,

> making them

>>> more effective with less active ingredient. Contrary to shampoo

> causing

>>> mycotoxins to enter the skin more easily, shampoo properly used

> helps wash

>>> mycotoxins, and any other fat soluble organics, from the hair.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>

>>

>>