Re: RE:The Shampoo/Toxin Connection

[Guest guest]

I'm sorry, I read that sodium laurel sulphate was used to weaponize

mycotoxins and jumpted to a conclusion..

Its quite possible that it doesnt make them absorb more.. as you said..

Thank you!

On 11/26/05, Gil Vice <gilvice@...> wrote:

>

> Let's not get too carried away with criticism or commercial shampoos.

> Millions of people use them with no problems whatsoever. Products from

> major

> companies, such as Lever, P & G, Henkel, Dial, etc.are well researched and

> safe. Some people (like me) have problems with some highly scented

> products

> from some smaller companies. If so, try a different brand.

>

> Propylene glycol is not a poison. It has been used for years in foods,

> including the icing of Oreo cookies. It is also used in some hand lotions.

> It is also used in some toothpastes. It is used in some antifreeze, the

> environmentally friendly ones. Ethylene glycol antifreeze is very toxic

> and

> has caused the deaths of many pets and other mammals which drink the sweet

> liquid left lying by back yard mechanics.

>

> Sodium lauryl sulfate is used in some engine degreasers. It is also used

> in many laundry and dishwashing detergents. It is a good surfactant. It

> may

> be a little irritating to some people. It is commonly used with sodium

> laureth sulfate in shampoos. This is a milder version, with possibly less

> cleaning ability. Re-read the chemical weapons article. It does not say

> that

> sodium lauryl sulfate is toxic. It is used to make bio-warfare agents more

> easily dispersible, just as it is used in agriculture to make pesicides

> and

> herbicides better dispersible, and to cling to leaves longer, making them

> more effective with less active ingredient. Contrary to shampoo causing

> mycotoxins to enter the skin more easily, shampoo properly used helps wash

> mycotoxins, and any other fat soluble organics, from the hair.

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

I hate to tell you millions of people suffer from everyday fragrance,

shampoo, toothpaste, cosmetics, cleaning products. We have mcs,

reactive airways disease or severe asthma. Many mold victims have

this terrible illness.

> On 11/26/05, Gil Vice <gilvice@h...> wrote:

> >

> > Let's not get too carried away with criticism or commercial

shampoos.

> > Millions of people use them with no problems whatsoever. Products

from

> > major

> > companies, such as Lever, P & G, Henkel, Dial, etc.are well

researched and

> > safe. Some people (like me) have problems with some highly scented

> > products

> > from some smaller companies. If so, try a different brand.

> >

> > Propylene glycol is not a poison. It has been used for years in

foods,

> > including the icing of Oreo cookies. It is also used in some hand

lotions.

> > It is also used in some toothpastes. It is used in some

antifreeze, the

> > environmentally friendly ones. Ethylene glycol antifreeze is very

toxic

> > and

> > has caused the deaths of many pets and other mammals which drink

the sweet

> > liquid left lying by back yard mechanics.

> >

> > Sodium lauryl sulfate is used in some engine degreasers. It is

also used

> > in many laundry and dishwashing detergents. It is a good

surfactant. It

> > may

> > be a little irritating to some people. It is commonly used with

sodium

> > laureth sulfate in shampoos. This is a milder version, with

possibly less

> > cleaning ability. Re-read the chemical weapons article. It does

not say

> > that

> > sodium lauryl sulfate is toxic. It is used to make bio-warfare

agents more

> > easily dispersible, just as it is used in agriculture to make

pesicides

> > and

> > herbicides better dispersible, and to cling to leaves longer,

making them

> > more effective with less active ingredient. Contrary to shampoo

causing

> > mycotoxins to enter the skin more easily, shampoo properly used

helps wash

> > mycotoxins, and any other fat soluble organics, from the hair.

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

I've also read that sodium lauryl sulfate is

carcinogenic.

-Haley

--- LiveSimply <quackadillian@...> wrote:

> I'm sorry, I read that sodium laurel sulphate

> was used to weaponize

> mycotoxins and jumpted to a conclusion..

> Its quite possible that it doesnt make them

> absorb more.. as you said..

>

> Thank you!

>

>

> On 11/26/05, Gil Vice <gilvice@...>

> wrote:

> >

> > Let's not get too carried away with

> criticism or commercial shampoos.

> > Millions of people use them with no problems

> whatsoever. Products from

> > major

> > companies, such as Lever, P & G, Henkel, Dial,

> etc.are well researched and

> > safe. Some people (like me) have problems

> with some highly scented

> > products

> > from some smaller companies. If so, try a

> different brand.

> >

> > Propylene glycol is not a poison. It has

> been used for years in foods,

> > including the icing of Oreo cookies. It is

> also used in some hand lotions.

> > It is also used in some toothpastes. It is

> used in some antifreeze, the

> > environmentally friendly ones. Ethylene

> glycol antifreeze is very toxic

> > and

> > has caused the deaths of many pets and other

> mammals which drink the sweet

> > liquid left lying by back yard mechanics.

> >

> > Sodium lauryl sulfate is used in some

> engine degreasers. It is also used

> > in many laundry and dishwashing detergents.

> It is a good surfactant. It

> > may

> > be a little irritating to some people. It is

> commonly used with sodium

> > laureth sulfate in shampoos. This is a milder

> version, with possibly less

> > cleaning ability. Re-read the chemical

> weapons article. It does not say

> > that

> > sodium lauryl sulfate is toxic. It is used to

> make bio-warfare agents more

> > easily dispersible, just as it is used in

> agriculture to make pesicides

> > and

> > herbicides better dispersible, and to cling

> to leaves longer, making them

> > more effective with less active ingredient.

> Contrary to shampoo causing

> > mycotoxins to enter the skin more easily,

> shampoo properly used helps wash

> > mycotoxins, and any other fat soluble

> organics, from the hair.

> >

> >

> >

>

>

> [Non-text portions of this message have been

> removed]

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

How can you say these products are not hurting people

if chemicals are absorbed in the skin?

--- Gil Vice <gilvice@...> wrote:

> Let's not get too carried away with criticism or

> commercial shampoos.

> Millions of people use them with no problems

> whatsoever. Products from major

> companies, such as Lever, P & G, Henkel, Dial, etc.are

> well researched and

> safe. Some people (like me) have problems with some

> highly scented products

> from some smaller companies. If so, try a different

> brand.

>

> Propylene glycol is not a poison. It has been used

> for years in foods,

> including the icing of Oreo cookies. It is also used

> in some hand lotions.

> It is also used in some toothpastes. It is used in

> some antifreeze, the

> environmentally friendly ones. Ethylene glycol

> antifreeze is very toxic and

> has caused the deaths of many pets and other mammals

> which drink the sweet

> liquid left lying by back yard mechanics.

>

> Sodium lauryl sulfate is used in some engine

> degreasers. It is also used

> in many laundry and dishwashing detergents. It is a

> good surfactant. It may

> be a little irritating to some people. It is

> commonly used with sodium

> laureth sulfate in shampoos. This is a milder

> version, with possibly less

> cleaning ability. Re-read the chemical weapons

> article. It does not say that

> sodium lauryl sulfate is toxic. It is used to make

> bio-warfare agents more

> easily dispersible, just as it is used in

> agriculture to make pesicides and

> herbicides better dispersible, and to cling to

> leaves longer, making them

> more effective with less active ingredient. Contrary

> to shampoo causing

> mycotoxins to enter the skin more easily, shampoo

> properly used helps wash

> mycotoxins, and any other fat soluble organics, from

> the hair.

>

>

> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:42:00 -0800 (PST)

> From: dottykalm <dottykalm@...>

> Subject: Re: Re: Medical Edge (also - The

> Shampoo/Toxin Connection)

>

> Just had to jump in here when I heard some

> discussion of the chemicals in

> shampoos. Before I even knew I was being poisoned

> from hidden mold in my

> wall cavities, I was getting some kind of lesions on

> my scalp that my

> hairdresser noticied. I thought I was buying one of

> the better

> shampoos, what a joke. She told me she had

> another client that had

> the same reaction.

>

> Then I started researching the chemicals in commonly

> sold shampoos, and I

> was shocked. Yes, propylene glycol is anti-freeze

> that is absorbed into the

> skin and it is in almost all shampoos, except the

> natural ones you find in

> health food stores, and now some grocery stores.

> Workers in factories that

> work with the stuff are required to wear masks and

> gloves by the MDS data

> sheets.

>

> Sodium laurel sulfate is in all of them too, and

> that is basically an engine

> degreaser, also easily absorbed into the skin.

> There is no FDA oversight on

> cosmetics or personal products, and the FDA is

> probably corrupt anyway...and

> nobody is going to stop the corporations from their

> huge profits they get

> from making people sick. I switched to natural

> products almost 7 years ago,

> and my hair is thicker and I no longer have rashes.

> Mold isn't the only

> coverup going on here.

> There is a long road ahead unfortunately.

> Judi

>

> --- kl_clayton <kl_clayton@...> wrote:

>

>

>

__________________________________

Music Unlimited

Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.

http://music./unlimited/

[Guest guest]

Delayed reation, I remember reading- I think in the mid 80's about

the first studies done showing chemicals ability to leach into a

bare hand- before then no one knew

>

> How can you say these products are not hurting people

> if chemicals are absorbed in the skin?

>

>

> --- Gil Vice <gilvice@h...> wrote:

>

> > Let's not get too carried away with criticism or

> > commercial shampoos.

> > Millions of people use them with no problems

> > whatsoever. Products from major

> > companies, such as Lever, P & G, Henkel, Dial, etc.are

> > well researched and

> > safe. Some people (like me) have problems with some

> > highly scented products

> > from some smaller companies. If so, try a different

> > brand.

> >

> > Propylene glycol is not a poison. It has been used

> > for years in foods,

> > including the icing of Oreo cookies. It is also used

> > in some hand lotions.

> > It is also used in some toothpastes. It is used in

> > some antifreeze, the

> > environmentally friendly ones. Ethylene glycol

> > antifreeze is very toxic and

> > has caused the deaths of many pets and other mammals

> > which drink the sweet

> > liquid left lying by back yard mechanics.

> >

> > Sodium lauryl sulfate is used in some engine

> > degreasers. It is also used

> > in many laundry and dishwashing detergents. It is a

> > good surfactant. It may

> > be a little irritating to some people. It is

> > commonly used with sodium

> > laureth sulfate in shampoos. This is a milder

> > version, with possibly less

> > cleaning ability. Re-read the chemical weapons

> > article. It does not say that

> > sodium lauryl sulfate is toxic. It is used to make

> > bio-warfare agents more

> > easily dispersible, just as it is used in

> > agriculture to make pesicides and

> > herbicides better dispersible, and to cling to

> > leaves longer, making them

> > more effective with less active ingredient. Contrary

> > to shampoo causing

> > mycotoxins to enter the skin more easily, shampoo

> > properly used helps wash

> > mycotoxins, and any other fat soluble organics, from

> > the hair.

> >

> >

> > Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:42:00 -0800 (PST)

> > From: dottykalm <dottykalm@y...>

> > Subject: Re: Re: Medical Edge (also - The

> > Shampoo/Toxin Connection)

> >

> > Just had to jump in here when I heard some

> > discussion of the chemicals in

> > shampoos. Before I even knew I was being poisoned

> > from hidden mold in my

> > wall cavities, I was getting some kind of lesions on

> > my scalp that my

> > hairdresser noticied. I thought I was buying one of

> > the better

> > shampoos, what a joke. She told me she had

> > another client that had

> > the same reaction.

> >

> > Then I started researching the chemicals in commonly

> > sold shampoos, and I

> > was shocked. Yes, propylene glycol is anti-freeze

> > that is absorbed into the

> > skin and it is in almost all shampoos, except the

> > natural ones you find in

> > health food stores, and now some grocery stores.

> > Workers in factories that

> > work with the stuff are required to wear masks and

> > gloves by the MDS data

> > sheets.

> >

> > Sodium laurel sulfate is in all of them too, and

> > that is basically an engine

> > degreaser, also easily absorbed into the skin.

> > There is no FDA oversight on

> > cosmetics or personal products, and the FDA is

> > probably corrupt anyway...and

> > nobody is going to stop the corporations from their

> > huge profits they get

> > from making people sick. I switched to natural

> > products almost 7 years ago,

> > and my hair is thicker and I no longer have rashes.

> > Mold isn't the only

> > coverup going on here.

> > There is a long road ahead unfortunately.

> > Judi

> >

> > --- kl_clayton <kl_clayton@y...> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

> __________________________________

> Music Unlimited

> Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.

> http://music./unlimited/

>