Guest guest Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 I'd also like to see this, and especially, any references that people can give to scientific literature or people's accounts that are lucid and credible. (Going to try to convince my doctor to do Dr. Shoemakers protocol in its entirety with me.) I'm particularly interested in refs on cholestyramine therapy and the blood and other tests that Dr. Shoemaker recommends.. personal experiences with same, insurance companies and same, etc. BTW, I have *never* heard anyone here say *anything* bad about Dr. Shoemaker. This guy has treated over 3000 mold patients, and I don't think that any of them have not found his approach worthwhile. I don't know what he charges but he does get reimbursed by insurance (often) and also does lots of unpaid outreach - like testifying before Congress. Seriously. Bluntly, I don't know how he does it. I started out as a skeptic, but the more I have heard, the more I feel that Dr. Shoemaker is a real-world bright light in a field that increasingly is becoming a battleground. In any field, there is what Galbraith (the economist) called in his book " The Affluent Society " - with a bit of contempt - 'the conventional wisdom'. Conventional because it is 'safe'. But the 'conventional wisdom' is often wrong when people attempt to apply it to new problems.. True innovation and all advances in scientific knowledge start out as ideas, like his, that explain some fact that clearly does not fit in to the conventional wisdom. Without people like Dr. Shoemaker I think science would not go forward. I'm saying this as someone who has always prided myself as an innovator, and I'm also the son of someone who is known now, almost 50 years after his death, as a world-class innovator. (i.e. its in my genes) So I know it when I see it. IMO. One thing we DEFINITELY need to be doing - and this is URGENT, is get mold out of our schools. If I was in the federal government I would be bringing Dr. Shoemaker to Washington to oversee some kind of program to test ALL schools, both public AND private for mold, and to both start a campaign to find the funds, RAPIDLY, to do nationwide remediation of all of them, and in the intirim, get the kids in those schools HEPA air cleaners and CSM as stopgap measures. Lets cut the crap and be pragmatic here. Our nations future is at stake. On 12/12/05, fletch_82000 <fletch_8@...> wrote: > > Hello Group, > > I would like it if all of Dr.Shoemaker(or Dr.Schaller) patients would > give updates on the progress of your treatments, the good and the bad > if you please. > > Thank you, > > Fletch > > > > > > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 DITTO, DITTO and DITTO. I can't agree with you more. If it is so obvious to all of us NOW, why isn't it as obvious to the agencies that can really make a change. They need to do what they were hired to do and to protect the public, and our best interest. As far as Dr.Shoemaker's protocol, it's still to early to tell (speaking of my wife) she has just started the treatment and has only been on CSM for a little over a month. I don't want to jump the gun with any type of treatment, since many of us have been through countless procedures. But, what we are seeing, is definately a step in the right direction. Some symptoms are subsiding and may not be as prevalent and less frequent. But there is alot bloodwork (levels) that need some serious long term procedures. You also must remember, we've gone almost 8 years without any definitive lessening of symptoms, until now. Also, did not have the funds to continue with any other treatments. So this does not mean that they would not work in the long run. Dr.Shoemaker's protocol is not just one size fits all, he does start everyone with CSM, but the rest of the protocol is geared specifically to YOUR needs, because each persons exposure/illness is unique unto themselves. So many variables... We will keep you informed. I know how important this is, not only to Sharon's (my wife) health, but also to all of you. Hope this helps, KC > > > > Hello Group, > > > > I would like it if all of Dr.Shoemaker(or Dr.Schaller) patients would > > give updates on the progress of your treatments, the good and the bad > > if you please. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Fletch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2005 Report Share Posted December 12, 2005 > Without people like Dr. Shoemaker I think science would not go forward.< I'm not a patient of Dr Shoemaker, but he is THE ONLY ONE who took into account the amazing 'altitude effect' and identified the EPO releaase. All these years, I just thought that I had some " genetic " affinity for heights and getting as much altitude as possible by any and all means. Now it appears that I had a damn good reason for liking to get " high " so much: It made me feel so much better. Thanks to Dr Shoemaker for listening, observing and finding the reasons. All other doctors just brainlocked into " I dunno. Guess it's all in your head " . - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 , How does altitude help you? barb b > > I'm not a patient of Dr Shoemaker, but he is THE ONLY ONE who took > into account the amazing 'altitude effect' and identified the EPO > releaase. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 > , > How does altitude help you? barb In Mold Warriors, Dr Shoemaker describes being intrigued by stories from two people who concentrated on mountain climbing and had results which appear to be beyond that of avoidance alone. He tested himself by driving to altitude and measured Erythropoietin levels, which were increased dramatically and lowered the inflammatory response by protecting the blood brain barrier. I've always felt better by spending time in pristine areas, but I've always felt my very best by shifting to a higher altitude. The effect doesn't last, but doing it peristently seemed to have a long term effect. It turns out that allergists in the 1950's were quite familiar with " altitude therapy " and recommended going to the mountains, but Dr Shoemaker is actively seeking the reasons which allow refinement of the concept. It's nice to have validation for an effect that most doctors are quick to say is probably nothing more than a relaxing break from normal life.. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 From: erikmoldwarrior Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 5:10 PM Subject: [] Re: Dr.Shoemaker patients, please give progress reports... He tested himself by driving to altitude and measured Erythropoietin levels, which were increased dramatically and lowered the inflammatory response by protecting the blood brain barrier. I've always felt better by spending time in pristine areas, but I've always felt my very best by shifting to a higher altitude. The effect doesn't last, but doing it peristently seemed to have a long term effect. * Why doesn't the effect last? Because you come down to a lower altitude? What would happen if you stayed at a higher altitude? Presumably the body would need to produce RBCs at a greater rate and the kidneys would keep blood levels of erythropoietin high. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 I find this very intriguing and interesting. When I read that infomation in MOLD WARRIORS, before seeing Dr. Shoemaker, it kind of jumped out at me. I had been to National Jewish Medical Center in Denver for a week a couple of summers ago to be evaluated for possible hypersensitivity pnemonitis, and I felt great most of the time I was there, and then started feeling bad again when I came home. Then when I had the lab tests done that showed low-normal erythropoietin that Dr. Shoemaker said did not compensate for my low VEGF, it really made me wonder if there was a connection. I had thought that I would feel worse at the higher elevation since there was less oxygen, but since that makes you increase red blood cell production, it makes sense. erikmoldwarrior <erikmoldwarrior@...> wrote: > , > How does altitude help you? barb In Mold Warriors, Dr Shoemaker describes being intrigued by stories from two people who concentrated on mountain climbing and had results which appear to be beyond that of avoidance alone. He tested himself by driving to altitude and measured Erythropoietin levels, which were increased dramatically and lowered the inflammatory response by protecting the blood brain barrier. I've always felt better by spending time in pristine areas, but I've always felt my very best by shifting to a higher altitude. The effect doesn't last, but doing it peristently seemed to have a long term effect. It turns out that allergists in the 1950's were quite familiar with " altitude therapy " and recommended going to the mountains, but Dr Shoemaker is actively seeking the reasons which allow refinement of the concept. It's nice to have validation for an effect that most doctors are quick to say is probably nothing more than a relaxing break from normal life.. - FAIR USE NOTICE: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 > * Why doesn't the effect last? Because you come down to a lower altitude? What would happen if you stayed at a higher altitude? Presumably the body would need to produce RBCs at a greater rate and the kidneys would keep blood levels of erythropoietin high. > > It appears to be a transitory response to " pushing the anaerobic threshold " . Staying at altitude just allows eventual equilibrium. I would go out and deliberately push myself to the limit of comfortable aerobic capacity and then increase altitude while maintaining the effect by adjusting pacing. What I found was that I absolutely must be free of any inflammatory response before and during the exercise. If I walk through a spore plume, I would crash and suffer if I were to continue. Sometimes I would be just sufficiently contaminated to make the choice very difficult to turn around and go to all the trouble of decontaminating and starting over, but I finally learned how important it was. Bitter experience taught me not to mess around with this. It was ABSOLUTELY necessary that the immune system be damped down or the exercise would be Counterproductive, spelled with a capital " C " rash. I believe that this is the effect Dr Shoemaker simulates with Actos. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 You know, I definitely have this too. Weird, I had not thought about it, but its definitely true. When I am over 7,000 feet or so for more than a day or two, I start feeling much better than I normally do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 My son does much better in winter I thought only because the mold counts are low, maybe the thinner atmosphere helps as well. We have him off singulair and steroids for a few weeks now. Fletch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2005 Report Share Posted December 13, 2005 > My son does much better in winter I thought only because the mold > counts are low, maybe the thinner atmosphere helps as well. We have > him off singulair and steroids for a few weeks now. > Fletch I move around a lot - which gives me some insights into what appears to be completely contradictory, for if I experience the contrarian exclusionary evidential experience, I have to seek an explanation why an " effect " could be seemingly opposite. My reasoning for THIS is that if your primary exposure is wet colonies that depend on winter water but are OUTSIDE your house, summer dries them out and increases exposure. If your main source are OUTSIDE colonies which dry out during the summer, wet winter months glues the colony together and wet spores don't travel as far. So if I get better in the winter, that means I'd be in a " good " house that is in-between plumes which have damped down due to wetness. But if you are IN one of those fresh, wet, toxic spore plumes - watch out! The wet winter plumes seem to have some of the " healthiest " toxins I've run into! Meaning that if you have mold INSIDE your house, the colony may well release fewer spores - which travel less far, but they will probably have the most potent toxins and getting better in such a place is unlikely. At least - that's how it seems to work for me. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2005 Report Share Posted December 15, 2005 I know it's been along time since your wife was originally exposed. Does she still sufffer from chronic fatigue??? Loni tigerpaw2c <tigerpaw2c@...> wrote: DITTO, DITTO and DITTO. I can't agree with you more. If it is so obvious to all of us NOW, why isn't it as obvious to the agencies that can really make a change. They need to do what they were hired to do and to protect the public, and our best interest. As far as Dr.Shoemaker's protocol, it's still to early to tell (speaking of my wife) she has just started the treatment and has only been on CSM for a little over a month. I don't want to jump the gun with any type of treatment, since many of us have been through countless procedures. But, what we are seeing, is definately a step in the right direction. Some symptoms are subsiding and may not be as prevalent and less frequent. But there is alot bloodwork (levels) that need some serious long term procedures. You also must remember, we've gone almost 8 years without any definitive lessening of symptoms, until now. Also, did not have the funds to continue with any other treatments. So this does not mean that they would not work in the long run. Dr.Shoemaker's protocol is not just one size fits all, he does start everyone with CSM, but the rest of the protocol is geared specifically to YOUR needs, because each persons exposure/illness is unique unto themselves. So many variables... We will keep you informed. I know how important this is, not only to Sharon's (my wife) health, but also to all of you. Hope this helps, KC > > > > Hello Group, > > > > I would like it if all of Dr.Shoemaker(or Dr.Schaller) patients would > > give updates on the progress of your treatments, the good and the bad > > if you please. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Fletch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2005 Report Share Posted December 18, 2005 Loni, Yes,she does. > > > > > > Hello Group, > > > > > > I would like it if all of Dr.Shoemaker(or Dr.Schaller) patients > would > > > give updates on the progress of your treatments, the good and > the bad > > > if you please. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > Fletch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.