Guest guest Posted February 27, 2006 Report Share Posted February 27, 2006 >The NAS have been " establishment " for years now, have you seen their buildings in London, makes me mad, they could set up a school with the money they spent on that!! or a treatment centre for autistic kids. Yes well done for sending your responses. Shame Bill Welsh was not printed too, I'm sure he had an excellent one and probably why they didn't print it! Loads of space for bloody Jane Asher and cakes which would send our kids crazy, don't get me started!! very tempted to cancel my membership (again!) but then again the more parents become aware ... Di x > For your responses to Mike Stanton's article in the NAS newsletter. > > It's very telling that the intro to the responses was introduced as > having 'provoked a hostile response from some members' > > I thought the responses were very measured, I think the hostility was > coming from somewhere else! > > Zoe > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2006 Report Share Posted February 27, 2006 Hi Zoe Thank you. I do admit that I kept my response quite measured because I wanted them to at least publish something in favour of biomedical. As it was they took out loads and just summarised what I origionally wrote. Kay. > > For your responses to Mike Stanton's article in the NAS newsletter. > > It's very telling that the intro to the responses was introduced as > having 'provoked a hostile response from some members' > > I thought the responses were very measured, I think the hostility was > coming from somewhere else! > > Zoe > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2006 Report Share Posted February 27, 2006 In a message dated 27/02/2006 19:24:39 GMT Standard Time, sharon_asd_uk@... writes: Having basically given up reading the NAS communcation mag a long time ago, this thread encouraged me to turn to the article in question - and to read your excellent responses! WELL DONE indeed. I especially loved Steph's first line. Out of the loop indeed. >>>I don;t subscribe - anybody scribe for me pretty please? Mandi x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2006 Report Share Posted February 27, 2006 Having basically given up reading the NAS communcation mag a long time ago, this thread encouraged me to turn to the article in question - and to read your excellent responses! WELL DONE indeed. I especially loved Steph's first line. Out of the loop indeed. Thank you for making the effort all of you Sharon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.