Guest guest Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 Muhammad Ahmad Al-Masry 64, Muhammad Korayem Street, Gomrok, andria, Egypt Tel: 0020-03-4800555 Fax: 0020-03-3082667 Web: massrii@... massrii@... > From: <thebigyeast@...> > Subject: [AlternativeAnswers] Re: 10 women will develop breast cancer at some time in her life > AlternativeAnswers > Date: Sunday, March 8, 2009, 9:57 AM > Anyone thinking of treating their cancer with conventional > medicine > might want to read this first before you jump right in. > > CHEMOTHERAPY QUOTES > " Two to 4% of cancers respond to chemotherapy….The > bottom line is for a few kinds of cancer chemo is a life > extending procedure---Hodgkin's disease, Acute > Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL), Testicular cancer, and > Choriocarcinoma. " ----Ralph Moss, Ph.D. 1995 Author of > Questioning Chemotherapy. > > " NCI now actually anticipates further increases, and > not decreases, in cancer mortality rates, from 171/100,000 > in 1984 to 175/100,000 by the year 2000! " -- > Epstein. > > " A study of over 10,000 patients shows clearly that > chemo’s supposedly strong track record with Hodgkin’s > disease (lymphoma) is actually a lie. Patients who underwent > chemo were 14 times more likely to develop leukemia and 6 > times more likely to develop cancers of the bones, joints, > and soft tissues than those patients who did not undergo > chemotherapy (NCI Journal 87:10). " - Diamond > > Children who are successfully treated for Hodgkin's > disease are 18 times more likely later to develop secondary > malignant tumours. Girls face a 35 per cent chance of > developing breast cancer by the time they are 40----which is > 75 times greater than the average. The risk of leukemia > increased markedly four years after the ending of successful > treatment, and reached a plateau after 14 years, but the > risk of developing solid tumours remained high and > approached 30 per cent at 30 years (New Eng J Med, March 21, > 1996) > > " Success of most chemotherapy is appalling…There is > no scientific evidence for its ability to extend in any > appreciable way the lives of patients suffering from the > most common organic cancer…chemotherapy for malignancies > too advanced for surgery which accounts for 80% of all > cancers is a scientific wasteland. " ---Dr Ulrich Abel. > 1990 > > The New England Journal of Medicine Reports- War on Cancer > Is a Failure: Despite $30 billion spent on research and > treatments since 1970, cancer remains > " undefeated, " with a death rate not lower but 6% > higher in 1997 than 1970, stated C. Bailar III, M.D., > Ph.D., and L. Gornik, M.H.S., both of the Department > of Health Studies at the University of Chicago in Illinois. > " The war against cancer is far from over, " stated > Dr. Bailar. " The effect of new treatments for cancer on > mortality has been largely disappointing. " > > " My studies have proved conclusively that untreated > cancer victims live up to four times longer than treated > individuals. If one has cancer and opts to do nothing at > all, he will live longer and feel better than if he > undergoes radiation, chemotherapy or surgery, other than > when used in immediate life-threatening > situations. " ---Prof . (1956 Transactions of the > N.Y. Academy of Medical Sciences, vol 6. There is a fifty > page article by Hardin of National Cancer Institute of > Bethesda, land. He surveyed global cancer of all types > and compared the untreated and the treated, to conclude that > the untreated outlives the treated, both in terms of quality > and in terms of quantity. Secondly he said, " Cancer > does not cure " . Third he said " There is a > physiological mechanism which finishes off an > individual " .) > > " With some cancers, notably liver, lung, pancreas, > bone and advanced breast, our 5 year survival from > traditional therapy alone is virtually the same as it was 30 > years ago. " ---P Quillin, Ph.D. > > " 1.7% increase in terms of success rate a year, its > nothing. By the time we get to the 24 century we might have > effective treatments, Star Trek will be long gone by that > time. " Ralph Moss. > > " ….chemotherapy’s success record is dismal. It can > achieve remissions in about 7% of all human cancers; for an > additional 15% of cases, survival can be > " prolonged " beyond the point at which death would > be expected without treatment. This type of survival is not > the same as a cure or even restored quality of > life. " - Diamond, M.D. > > " Keep in mind that the 5 year mark is still used as > the official guideline for " cure " by mainstream > oncologists. Statistically, the 5 year cure makes > chemotherapy look good for certain kinds of cancer, but when > you follow cancer patients beyond 5 years, the reality often > shifts in a dramatic way. " -Diamond. > > Studies show that women taking tamoxifen after surviving > breast cancer then have a high propensity to develop > endometrial cancer. The NCI and Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, > which makes the drug, aggressively lobbied State of > California regulators to keep them from adding tamoxifen to > their list of carcinogens. Zeneca is one of the sponsors of > Breast Cancer Awareness Month. > > " Most cancer patients in this country die of > chemotherapy…Chemotherapy does not eliminate breast, colon > or lung cancers. This fact has been documented for over a > decade. Yet doctors still use chemotherapy for these > tumours…Women with breast cancer are likely to die faster > with chemo than without it. " -Alan Levin, M.D. > > According to the Cancer Statistics for 1995, published by > the ACS in their small journal (2), the 5-year survival rate > has improved from 50%-56% for whites and 39%-40% for blacks > from 1974/1976 - 1983/1990. However, the data is taken from > FIVE of the states with the lowest death rates AND the > smallest populations! NONE of the 10 states with the highest > death rates AND comprising 34% of the Total U.S. Cancer > Deaths, were included in the data! Also, in prior years, the > Composite (Ave.) 5-year survival rate for ALL Cancers > Combined was computed and published. This Ave. 5-year > survival crept upward to 50%, in the early nineties. It now > stands around 51-52%, due primarily to the improvement of > 11% survival for Colon and 13% increased survival for > Prostate. It gets worse. The ACS boasts of > " statistically significant " results when Uterine > Ca survival drops from 89%/60%-85%/55% (W/B)?? Also, > Pancreas Ca is 3-3 (W) and Laryngeal Ca survival drops from > 59%-53% ( while Cervical Ca drops from 63%-56% (. Liver > Ca improves from 4%-7%. I wonder how many Pancreatic and > Hepatic Ca patients cheered these dramatic results? Ovarian > Ca = 36%/40% - 42%/38% (W/B) and Breast Ca = 75%/63% - > 82%/66% (W/B). In 16 years the Breast Ca rate improved 3-7%, > while Uterine Ca decreased 4-5%. Aren't these marvelous > results that the Cancer Establishment should boast > about??----RD Hodgell, M.D. > > " The five year cancer survival statistics of the > American Cancer Society are very misleading. They now count > things that are not cancer, and, because we are able to > diagnose at an earlier stage of the disease, patients > falsely appear to live longer. Our whole cancer research in > the past 20 years has been a failure. More people over 30 > are dying from cancer than ever before…More women with > mild or benign diseases are being included in statistics and > reported as being " cured " . When government > officials point to survival figures and say they are winning > the war against cancer they are using those survival rates > improperly. " ---Dr J. Bailer, New England Journal of > Medicine (Dr Bailer’s answer to questions put by Neal > Barnard MD of the Physicians Committee For Responsible > Medicine and published in PCRM Update, sept/oct 1990. > > " I look upon cancer in the same way that I look upon > heart disease, arthritis, high blood pressure, or even > obesity, for that matter, in that by dramatically > strengthening the body's immune system through diet, > nutritional supplements, and exercise, the body can rid > itself of the cancer, just as it does in other degenerative > diseases. Consequently, I wouldn't have chemotherapy and > radiation because I'm not interested in therapies that > cripple the immune system, and, in my opinion, virtually > ensure failure for the majority of cancer > patients. " ---Dr n Whitaker, M.D. > > " Finding a cure for cancer is absolutely > contraindicated by the profits of the cancer industry’s > chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery cash trough. " -Dr > Diamond, M.D. > > " We have a multi-billion dollar industry that is > killing people, right and left, just for financial gain. > Their idea of research is to see whether two doses of this > poison is better than three doses of that poison. " -Glen > Warner, M.D. oncologist. > > Robbins: > > " Percentage of cancer patients whose lives are > predictably saved by chemotherapy - 3% > Conclusive evidence (majority of cancers) that chemotherapy > has any positive influcence on survival or quality of life - > none. > Percentage of oncologists who said if they had cancer they > would not participate in chemotherapy trials due to its > " ineffectiveness and its unacceptable toxicity " - > 75% > Percentage of people with cancer in the U.S. who receive > chemotherapy - 75%. > Company that accounts for nearly half of the chemotherapy > sales in the world - Bristol-Meyers Squibb. > Chairman of the board of Bristol-Meyers - L. Gelb. > Mr. Gelb's other job: vice chairman, board of > overseers, board of managers, Memorial Sloan-Kettering > Cancer Center, World's largest private cancer treatment > and research center. > Chairman, Memorial Sloan-Kettering's board of > overseers, board of managers - S. . > 's other job - director, Philip (tobacco > company). > Director, Ivax, Inc., a prominent chemotherapy company - > Broder. > Broder's other job (until 1995) - executive director, > National Cancer Institute. " from Reclaiming Our Health: > Exploding the Medical Myth and Embracing the Source of True > Healing by Robbins. > " If you can shrink the tumour 50% or more for 28 days > you have got the FDA's definition of an active drug. > That is called a response rate, so you have a > response..(but) when you look to see if there is any life > prolongation from taking this treatment what you find is all > kinds of hocus pocus and song and dance about the disease > free survival, and this and that. In the end there is no > proof that chemotherapy in the vast majority of cases > actually extends life, and this is the GREAT LIE about > chemotherapy, that somehow there is a correlation between > shrinking a tumour and extending the life of the > patient. " ---Ralph Moss > > " The majority of publications equate the effect of > chemotherapy with (tumour) response, irrespective of > survival. Many oncologists take it for granted that response > to therapy prolongs survival, an opinion which is based on a > fallacy and which is not supported by clinical studies. To > date there is no clear evidence that the treated patients, > as a whole, benefit from chemotherapy as to their quality of > life. " ---Abel.1990. > > " For the majority of the cancers we examined, the > actual improvements (in survival) have been small or have > been overestimated by the published rates...It is difficult > to find that there has been much progress...(For breast > cancer), there is a slight improvement...(which) is > considerably less than reported. " ---General Accounting > Office > > " As a chemist trained to interpret data, it is > incromprehensible to me that physicians can ignore the clear > evidence that chemotherapy does much, much more harm than > good. " ---Alan Nixon, Ph.D., Past President, American > Chemical Society. > > " He said, " I'm giving cancer patients over > here at this major cancer clinic drugs that are killing > them, and I can't stop it because they say the > protocol's what's important. " And I say, > " But the patient's not doing well. " They say, > " The protocol's what's important, not the > patient. " And he said, " You can't believe what > goes on in the name of medicine and science in this > country. " -- Null > > The Politics of Cancer---Epstein > > That in spite of over $20 billion expenditures since the > " War against Cancer " was launched by President > Nixon in 1971, there has been little if any significant > improvement in treatment and survival rates for most common > cancers, in spite of contrary misleading hype by the cancer > establishment---the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and > American Cancer Society (ACS). > > That the cancer establishment remains myopically fixated on > damage control _diagnosis and treatment _ and basic genetic > research, with, not always benign, indifference to cancer > prevention. Meanwhile, the incidence of cancer, including > nonsmoking cancers, has escalated to epidemic proportions > with lifetime cancer risks now approaching 50%. > > That the NCI has a long track record of budgetary shell > games in efforts to mislead Congress and the public with its > claim that it allocates substantial resources to cancer > prevention. Over the last year, the NCI has made a series of > widely divergent claims, ranging from $480 million to $1 > billion, for its prevention budget while realistic estimates > are well under $100 million. > > That the NCI allocates less than 1% of its budget to > research on occupational cancer _ the most avoidable of all > cancers _ which accounts for well over 10% of all adult > cancer deaths, besides being a major cause of childhood > cancer. > > That cancer establishment policies, particularly those of > the ACS, are strongly influenced by pervasive conflicts of > interest with the cancer drug and other industries. As > admitted by former NCI director Broder, the NCI has > become " what amounts to a governmental pharmaceutical > company. " > > That the MD Comprehensive Cancer Center was sued > in August, 1998 for making unsubstantiated claims that it > cures " well over 50% of people with cancer. " > > That the NCI, with enthusiastic support from the ACS _ the > tail that wags the NCI dog _ has effectively blocked funding > for research and clinical trials on promising non-toxic > alternative cancer drugs for decades, in favor of highly > toxic and largely ineffective patented drugs developed by > the multibillion dollar global cancer drug industry. > Additionally, the cancer establishment has systematically > harassed the proponents of non-toxic alternative cancer > drugs. > > That, as reported in The Chronicle of Philanthropy, the ACS > is " more interested in accumulating wealth than saving > lives. " Furthermore, it is the only known > " charity " that makes contributions to political > parties. > > That the NCI and ACS have embarked on unethical trials with > two hormonal drugs, tamoxifen and Evista, in ill-conceived > attempts to prevent breast cancer in healthy women while > suppressing evidence that these drugs are known to cause > liver and ovarian cancer, respectively, and in spite of the > short-term lethal complications of tamoxifen. The > establishment also proposes further chemoprevention trials > this fall on tamoxifen, and also Evista, in spite of two > published long-term European studies on the ineffectiveness > of tamoxifen. This represents medical malpractice verging on > the criminal. > > That the ACS and NCI have failed to provide Congress and > regulatory agencies with available scientific information on > a wide range of unwitting exposures to avoidable carcinogens > in air, water, the workplace, and consumer products > suchfood, cosmetics and toiletries, and household products. > As a result, corrective legislative and regulatory action > have not been taken. > > That the cancer establishment has also failed to provide > the public, particularly African American and > underprivileged ethnic groups with their disproportionately > higher cancer incidence rates, with information on avoidable > carcinogenic exposures, thus depriving them of their > right-to-know and effectively preventing them from taking > action to protect themselves _ a flagrant denial of > environmental justice. > > > http://www.oasisadvancedwellness.com/learning/chemo-quotes.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > 10 women will develop breast cancer at some time in > her life. > > > > First of all, remember that breast cancer is a > treatable disease. > > > > There are four kinds of treatment. One or more of > these may be used for you depending upon what you need and > want. The four ways of treating breast cancer are: > > > > 1. Surgery (Removing the cancer with an operation.) > > 2. Radiation therapy (Killing the cancer cells with > special x-rays.) > > 3. Chemotherapy (Killing the cancer cells with drugs.) > > 4. Hormone therapy (Stopping the cells from growing > with hormone drugs.) > > > > Each of these four treatments is described in more > detail later in this document. > > > > Your doctor should tell you what kind of breast cancer > you have and the stage it is in (that is, if it has spread > and, if so, how far it has spread). > > > > Some breast cancer can be treated in several different > ways, and you may have a choice of treatments. If your > doctor tells you that you do have a choice, you should take > time to decide which treatment you would prefer. > > > > Unfortunately, some breast cancer can only be treated > in one, specific way, so not all persons have a choice of > treatment. Before making any decision or starting any > treatment, you may wish to talk with each doctor who may be > giving you a particular type of treatment: > > > > A surgeon removes breast cancer with an operation. > > > > A radiation oncologist gives breast cancer patients > special x-rays to kill their cancer cells. > > > > A medical oncologist treats breast cancer patients, > including selecting the drugs that can be used to kill their > cancer cells or stop their cancer cells from growing. > > > > A plastic surgeon rebuilds the breasts after an > operation. > > > > You have a right to get a second opinion from another > doctor if you wish. > > > > You also may wish to participate in a clinical trial > of a new or potentially improved treatment, and you should > ask your doctor about these options if you are interested. > > > > > > http://www.onlinebreastcancerinfo.com > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > ********************************************* > Peacefulmind.com Sponsors Alternative Answers- > > HEALING NATURALLY- Learn preventative and curative measure > to take for many ailments at: > > http://www.peacefulmind.com/ailments.htm > ____________________________________________ > > -To INVITE A FRIEND to our healing community, copy and > paste this address in an email to them: > > AlternativeAnswers/subs_invite > > > ___________________________________________ > To ADD A LINK, RESOURCE, OR WEBSITE to Alternative Answers > please Go to: > > AlternativeAnswers/links > > _____________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.