Guest guest Posted June 1, 2001 Report Share Posted June 1, 2001 Like many (but I gather, not all) CPHVA members, I received a letter last week, signed by Jackie Carnell and ine Pearson about the draft Nursing and Midwifery Order. I was amazed that it suggested that I supported a position that I think is very confused and that I have consistently advised against. I am very distressed at that implication, but more importantly, I am worried that the CPHVA position has not grasped what is needed to ensure a proper regulatory process for health visiting. I would be interested in hearing what other people thought when they received the letter. The confusion may be because the term 'mandatory qualification' is being used, which is not relevant to the regulatory process. The differences are difficult to understand, so I have written a third briefing paper that sets these out (attached). In brief, health visiting is a statutory qualification because: 1. The qualification that is acknowledged in law: in the National Health Service (Qualification of Health Visitors) Act 1972 is the current statute for health visitors. 2. It is regulated as a profession, in law. The Nurses, Midwives and Health Visitors Act 1997 which sets out conditions for maintaining a register of health visitors. 3. Conditions for entry to the Register and the right to use the title of registered health visitor are laid down in the Nurses, Midwives and Health Visitors (Training) Amendment Rules Approval Order 2000 (Statutory Instrument 2000 No. 2554). The proposed ‘Nursing and Midwifery Order 2001’ only affects the middle one of these (point 2). It does allow for a health visiting register and for health visiting representatation on Council, but this is not clear, because the whole Order avoids mentioning the term 'health visiting,' presuming instead, that health visitors are nurses so the term 'nursing' is sufficient to describe them. That is the basis for the confusion, and that is why our MAYDAY campaign has campaigned for changes to be made to the title of the Order and of Council. A mandatory qualification is introduced if the government of the day decides it is necessary for a specific activity to be carried out by someone with a particular qualification. It is extremely rare for this to be deemed necessary, so there are very few instances when a qualification is made mandatory. Health visiting is not a mandatory qualification. The reason that health visitors have to be employed to do health visiting (or nurses to do nursing, come to that), is because only health visitors are qualified to do the job. All registrants are accountable for their practice, but health visitors are accountable as health visitors, not just as nurses. Seeking a mandatory qualification is very different from ensuring the regulatory process is maintained. Five of us went to meet Ros Mead yestrerday, who is the civil servant responsible for drafting the Order. I will report baack in a separate email. Best wishes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.