Guest guest Posted September 21, 2000 Report Share Posted September 21, 2000 The discussion on this subject should be centered on whether the particular method or equipment has a a real basis or not. If it is high or low tech is irrelevant. There are ignorant people who come up with both. Both have to be tested and scrutinized on whether they work or not. To choose one or the other would be silly. Just because something is tecnologically advanced does not mean it is effective. By the same token, when a world class athlete trains " intuitivey " , it should be remembered that many athletes are good not because of what they do but in spite of it. If a non physician tried to perform brain surgery in an intuitive way, somebody would end up dead. This field is no less of a science than brain surgery; the only difference are the consequences for being wrong. Yosef Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.