Guest guest Posted August 31, 2000 Report Share Posted August 31, 2000 From: " Matt Madsen " <mmadsen@...> > > So as I have done on other groups I do on this group question the > > obsession with weightlifting, powerlifting exercises as the base of > > an athletes conditioning work. > I think you've misconstrued things slightly. I think the points > generally made are: > > (a) if you're going to weight train for athletic performance, powerlifting or weightlifting training generally carries over much better than bodybuilding training, and Agreed without a doubt. > ( many popular sports (especially American football) are largely anaerobic power sports that benefit from resistance training. Again agreed. However recent discussions have hinted that many folk do weightlifting or powerlifting (not bodybuilding) for the sake of it rather than to enhance performance in their sport or to rectify any weakness. My point was: 1, that if we are suposedly unclear on technique then how can we select the best exercises and 2, if technique is such a big issue why do we not spend more time on it. Case in point would be weightlifting. Now I assume that all one needs to do to pass the CSCS is be familiar with the contents of " Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning " to lay claim to being a strength and conditioning coach. Now as anyone who does weightlifting or has a copy of " The Weightlifting Encyclopedia " knows that there is a heck of a lot to doing and ten times more to teaching all the Olympic Lifts and assistance lifts. Now if you take a sport like football or gymnastics where there are a wider range of skills and techniques required it becomes less clear how solely relying on two or three Olympic Lifts is going to assist performance and even correct a weakness especially in gymnastics where athletes take their joints through such a large range of movements. If adequate time is being spent addressing skill and technique, apart from correcting any muscle imbalance problems (in aerobics it is almost the chest and shoulders doing the work so we find we need to use weights to train the back) then where does the weight training fit in? A question I asked on another list is: how many teams lose because of an ability to Powerclean X amount of weight? Compare this to the numerous times we see teams and athletes make basic skill and technical errors. > Perhaps I've missed something, but I haven't seen anyone arguing that > endurance athletes need power cleans to stay competitive. This is again true, however I have used powercleans with endurance cyclists. I am also sure that Hakinnen and others have done research showing that explosive weight lifting does benefit endurance performance. Cheers Hamish Hamish Ferguson BA, Dip SpSt, Cert Coaching Personal Trainer and Cycling Coach New Zealand Sport Aerobics Representative ph/fax 64 3 338 7373 and mobile 025 221 1287 email Bikecoach@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 1, 2000 Report Share Posted September 1, 2000 " Hamish Ferguson " <bikecoach@c...> wrote: > I am also sure that Hakinnen and others have done research showing > that explosive weight lifting does benefit endurance performance. I wonder whether the bulk of research supports that conclusion, at least for subjects that are neither sedentary nor novices? A thoughtful discussion of the theoretical considerations as to how and when strength training benefits endurance performance is available online at this address: http://home.hia.no/~stephens/str & end.htm With respect to research regarding strength training and endurance performance, an interesting review of the literature is available online at this address: http://www.sportsci.org/news/traingain/resistance.html I enjoy lifting weights, especially squatting and deadlifting, but I've been abstaining from those and any other lifts that substantially involve the legs for the past two years because I'm afraid it will hamper my performance in cycling. (I do a little racing at the very lowest amateur level in the U.S.) A decent workout of squats or deadlifts leaves me fatigued enough that I have to space my hard cycling workouts further apart than I do when I abstain from those exercises. That alone suggests to me that my cycling performance would not benefit from off-bike resistance exercise. My cycling performance hasn't seemed to vary when I compare seasons when I included squats and lunges to those when I didn't, but there are so many other variables affecting my performance that I can't draw any reliable conclusions from that. What's everyone else think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2000 Report Share Posted September 2, 2000 Hello From: " s " <johnstevens@...> > That alone suggests to me that my > cycling performance would not benefit from off-bike resistance > exercise. My cycling performance hasn't seemed to vary when I > compare seasons when I included squats and lunges to those when I > didn't, but there are so many other variables affecting my > performance that I can't draw any reliable conclusions from that. > > What's everyone else think? That it is difficult for me to base my opinion of weight training for endurance athletes on your personal experience with weights. My opinion may be swayed more by the current trend for more Pro teams to use weight training (Lance even) and the current use of weights by the Australian Institute of Sport endurance cyclists who use very heavy weight training (high sets, 1-5 reps) in the early part of their season. However, the choice to use weights must be made on an individual basis. You may pick up from my posts that I am against automatically putting everyone through a programme of weightlifting or powerlifting. Yet, at the moment I am including deadlifts, squats and split squats in my programme because I have picked up a weakness in my jumping technique for sport aerobics and (ther are those words) core strength which I feel powerlifting exercises will correct the best. This doesn't mean that I think that everyone who does aerobics should lift weights. Cheers Hamish Hamish Ferguson BA, Dip SpSt, Cert Coaching Personal Trainer and Cycling Coach New Zealand Sport Aerobics Representative http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Falls/8908/index.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2000 Report Share Posted September 7, 2000 Hamish Ferguson <bikecoach@...> wrote: > Yet, at the moment I am including deadlifts, squats and split > squats in my programme because I have picked up a weakness in my > jumping technique for sport aerobics and (there are those words) > core strength which I feel powerlifting exercises will correct the > best. Do you find sports aerobics...aerobic? It all seems quite anaerobic to me. Cardiovascularly stressful, but anaerobic. Also, wouldn't power cleans or jump squats fit your needs a bit better? Matt Madsen __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2000 Report Share Posted September 8, 2000 Hello From: " Matt Madsen " <mmadsen@...> > Do you find sports aerobics...aerobic? Heh heh, well no. Never ran out of steam in a routine yet. It's a two minute fitness routine where one mixes aerobic dance (as high intensity as possibe) with gymnastic moves based on dynamic strength, static strength, jumps and flexibility. > Also, wouldn't power cleans or jump squats fit your needs a bit > better? Yeah, in time. I think I will do power snatch instead of split squat. My lower back is pretty weak and I suspect a cause of back and hamstring pain has been jumping with a rounded back and head high kicks that come from the back not the hamstrings. Funny enough for a guy who can do the splits but I really struggle to do a anterior pelvic tilt when deadlifting. I am getting there and will progress on to more challenging exercises. Cheers Hamish Hamish Ferguson BA, Dip SpSt, Cert Coaching Personal Trainer and Cycling Coach New Zealand Sport Aerobics Representative ph/fax 64 3 338 7373 and mobile 025 221 1287 email Bikecoach@... http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Falls/8908/index.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2000 Report Share Posted September 13, 2000 Hamish Ferguson <bikecoach@...> wrote: > " Matt Madsen " <mmadsen@...> wrote: > > Do you find sports aerobics...aerobic? > > Heh heh, well no. Never ran out of steam in a routine yet. It's a > two minute fitness routine where one mixes aerobic dance (as high > intensity as possibe) with gymnastic moves based on dynamic > strength, static strength, jumps and flexibility. Right. That's what I was getting at. It's quite a misnomer. Matt Madsen __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2000 Report Share Posted September 13, 2000 Hamish Ferguson <bikecoach@...> wrote: > " Matt Madsen " <mmadsen@...> wrote: > > Gymnasts get most of their conditioning from gymnastic-specific > > movements, and they seem to work quite well. > > Again my point exactely. Of course, in the case of gymnasts, many of their sport-specific training movements are classic resistance training movements: chin-ups, dips, etc. > > Football players obviously benefit from squats and cleans whether > > those movements are considered sport-specific or not. > > But what of hours spent learning plays. As a possible scenario a > Rugby Team in the NZ, AUS, SA Super 12 series spent the early part > of their season walking through plays. Now this would do little to > enhance their fitness and prepare them for the upcoming season. I > see this as a good time to be in the gym. I assume they're spending plenty of time training hard. They can only spend so many hours a day (or week) training hard, but they CAN add more hours of low-intensity strategic/tactical training. Or they're taking some time off from hard training to recover. You simply cannot scrimmage eight hours a day without falling apart. > However in-season you would expect teams to practice these drills > at 100% intensity. Not necessarily. You'd only expect them to practice drills at high intensity some of the time. It's a rough sport. Think of all the creative ways boxers have to train outside the ring, because they cannot spar at 100% without taking a beating. > Do you see a role for resistance training for athletes here? Sure. > > Driving off the line is not doing a power clean, but the two > > movements use roughly the same muscles in similar proportions. > So what is the best way to improve ones ability to drive off the > line? To improve your skill at driving off the line, you obviously want to...drive off the line. Most of this is done against padded blocking shields though, so the defensive line (and the blocking offensive line as well) isn't just taking a pounding every practice. But that skill is just one component. Adding muscle mass (particularly in the right places) and even dead weight helps too. Obviously lifting and eating have their place. > > Weight training isn't about skill and technique (except for a > > competitive lifter, of course); it's about building strength. > > Isn't strength specific, see above question. No, absolutely not. In an eight-week study, sure, you're only going to see the quick neuromuscular adaptations, and those are fairly specific, but it's obvious that a veteran bodybuilder is stronger after years of training, even in movements he hasn't specifically trained. If you need to be as strong as possible for your mass, you may need to be very specific in your training -- Olympic weightlifters definitely must -- but many athletes don't. Matt Madsen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.