Guest guest Posted October 30, 2000 Report Share Posted October 30, 2000 Dear All: I'm not one to give up for what I believe is a rational principle. I felt that I could contribute but apparently the linguistics and my intention were misinterpreted. My intended elucidation was misinterpreted and taken to a place I don't even go. I've been in this search and field for over 25 years and am not naive to what's considered fringe and accepted. As far a consciousness and tensegrity at a " Guru " sense, I think it's interesting however I interpret it (partly) as a feedback system (some consider billions of years old), using mechanical transduction (tension feedback) which elaborates into a hierarchical system to proprioception, nociception etc. Sensory feedback is critical to motor learning. Everyone I have ever examined functionally has some level of imbalance (Janda crossed syndrome at a simplistic level) of weak and tight links in a variety of kinetic or movement chains, in a variety of tissues. Those weak (inhibited) and tight (hyper-facilitated) areas are all adaptively interrelated from head to toe, one homeostatic process. Finding the weakest link in the chain and loading the whole chain together works better than isolating each dysfunctional area. (this is now generally accepted) One of the draw backs with some general PNF, plyometrics and ballistics is that in some general loading patterns the lever arm can span to large a gap. There can be gaps of uniformity in developing tension throughout the chain. Many times a myofascial unit can have both weakness and tightness, and very many times are predictable. CTK patterns use creative strategies to load, maintain and develop tension in the entire chain. Many fit, elite athletes have found that once we functionally (and by test loading) determine the weak links and load the chain, they are very challenged, usually breaking a sweat or becoming winded in less than a few minutes.Depending o the individual intensity levels can be very very high. Modifications can be made to almost any age, sport or adaptive state. Instead of chasing pain, the key is to hierarchically chase the weak links. Once the individual starts to sense these altered tension links they can creatively develop patterns to maintain the chase. It can be done almost anywhere. Below is a correspondence I recently received from Dr. Ingber >Subject:Re: Tensegrity and mechanoregulation: from skeleton to cytoskeleton Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 13:16:43 -0500 (EST) From: IngberDE@... zhands@... K/ I have no memory of speaking to Mel Siff,however, I travel so much and meet so many people it is possible that I did speak to him at some meeting at some point in the past. I have and continue to be attacked by many critics over the past 20 years. Yet, very few if any have any problem recognizing that the musculoskeleton is organized as a tensegrity system (albeit hierarchical and multimodular in nature). I do not see any issue to debate about here. It's stability depends on internal tensile prestress generated within an interconnected network of isoloated compression-resistant bones and a continuous series of tensile muscles, tendons and ligaments. I would keep moving on in your work if you find it is helpful; success is always the most convincing proof-of-principle. Best of luck, >DON INGBER CTK is still and continues to be developed, I am discovering new and more efficient loading patterns, usually on a daily basis, all based on the functional imbalance and intended outcome. I've been searching for this for over 25 years, all stemming from a career (possible) ending ski injury. Regards A. Zenker D.C. Performance Edge Dynamics Santa Cruz, CA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.