Guest guest Posted February 13, 2006 Report Share Posted February 13, 2006 Hi Matt, I have always used the system you originally suggested a few years ago and have always found it to be very helpful. It was a good system when just doing single channel amplitude training, but I found it limited in that regard when adding in other types of training. Now I find I'm using a real hybrid of that original system, Pete's method and some of my own ... so there is no real logic to it. For example, I would describe a two channel setup of Fz/A2/g/F8/A2 as (Fz-A2)+(F8-A2) so that it at least makes mathematical sense to anyone else who comes along. I'll be interested to hear what others are doing. Mark Darling describing protocols > It would be very helpful if neurofeedback practitioners could standardize > the > way they describe the protocols they use. This would permit others to try > the exact same > protocol as a means to replicating what we do. > > What I would invite from members of this list is how they would suggest > that a session's > protocol be described for the equipment/software they use. I recognize > that different > neurofeedback equipment has different ways of setting up protocols and > therefore it > might be necessary to define protocols differently depending on the > equipment/software > they use. This can include BrainMaster, Pocket- Neurobics, pROSHI, > BioExplorer and > whatever else members of this community are using. > > A protocol's description should likely include information about rewards, > inhibits, > duration, plus anything that is unique to that system that other users > would need to > attend to in order to replicate the protocol. > > The database I am using has a limit of 12 cells of information to describe > a session. It > would be helpful if the protocol description could be limited to that > size. The > information in those cells can be in any format: numberical or text. > > Your input is greatly appreciated. > -Matt > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2006 Report Share Posted February 13, 2006 Mark I don't get the g but I guess it means ground but I don't know where it is placed. I prefer a standardised formula and so your second formula I understand only if I see the first. I'll follow any code that is set for the group. Mark describing protocols> It would be very helpful if neurofeedback practitioners could standardize > the> way they describe the protocols they use. This would permit others to try > the exact same> protocol as a means to replicating what we do.>> What I would invite from members of this list is how they would suggest > that a session's> protocol be described for the equipment/software they use. I recognize > that different> neurofeedback equipment has different ways of setting up protocols and > therefore it> might be necessary to define protocols differently depending on the > equipment/software> they use. This can include BrainMaster, Pocket- Neurobics, pROSHI, > BioExplorer and> whatever else members of this community are using.>> A protocol's description should likely include information about rewards, > inhibits,> duration, plus anything that is unique to that system that other users > would need to> attend to in order to replicate the protocol.>> The database I am using has a limit of 12 cells of information to describe > a session. It> would be helpful if the protocol description could be limited to that > size. The> information in those cells can be in any format: numberical or text.>> Your input is greatly appreciated.> -Matt>>>>>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2006 Report Share Posted February 14, 2006 Mark~ Ground can be placed anywhere on the head neck or body, even the nose, makes no difference. The letter G rather than a placement because everyone has their own favorite spot for Ground. ~ Re: describing protocols Mark I don't get the g but I guess it means ground but I don't know where it is placed. Mark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2006 Report Share Posted February 14, 2006 On BioExplorer, these descriptions could be put on the "notes" page of each design. describing protocols> It would be very helpful if neurofeedback practitioners could standardize > the> way they describe the protocols they use. This would permit others to try > the exact same> protocol as a means to replicating what we do.>> What I would invite from members of this list is how they would suggest > that a session's> protocol be described for the equipment/software they use. I recognize > that different> neurofeedback equipment has different ways of setting up protocols and > therefore it> might be necessary to define protocols differently depending on the > equipment/software> they use. This can include BrainMaster, Pocket- Neurobics, pROSHI, > BioExplorer and> whatever else members of this community are using.>> A protocol's description should likely include information about rewards, > inhibits,> duration, plus anything that is unique to that system that other users > would need to> attend to in order to replicate the protocol.>> The database I am using has a limit of 12 cells of information to describe > a session. It> would be helpful if the protocol description could be limited to that > size. The> information in those cells can be in any format: numberical or text.>> Your input is greatly appreciated.> -Matt>>>>>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2006 Report Share Posted February 14, 2006 Thanks. Re: describing protocols Mark I don't get the g but I guess it means ground but I don't know where it is placed. Mark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.